Skip to main content
Log in

Range of the posterior probability of an interval for priors with unimodality preserving contaminations

  • Bayesian Robustness
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Range of the posterior probability of an interval over the ε-contamination class Γ={π=(1−ε)π0q:qεQ} is derived. Here, π0 is the elicited prior which is assumed unimodal, ε is the amount of uncertainty in π0, andQ is the set of all probability densitiesq for which π=(1−ε)π0q is unimodal with the same mode as that of π0. We show that the sup (resp. inf) of the posterior probability of an interval is attained by a prior which is equal to (1−ε)π0 except in one interval (resp. two disjoint intervals) where it is constant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu, S. and DasGupta, A. (1990). Bayesian analysis under distribution bands, Tech. Report 90-48, Department of Statistics, Purdue University, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1984). The robust Bayesian viewpoint (with discussion),Robustness of Bayesian Analysis (ed. J. Kadane), 63–144, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1985).Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. (1990). Robust Bayesian analysis: sensitivity to the prior,J. Statist. Plann. Inference,25, 303–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. and Berliner, L. M. (1986). Robust Bayes and empirical Bayes analysis with ε-contaminated priors,Ann. Statist.,14, 461–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. and O'Hagan, A. (1988). Ranges of posterior probabilities for unimodal priors with specified quantiles,Bayesian Statistics III (eds. J. M. Bernardo, M. H. Degroot, D. V. Lindley, and A. F. M. Smith), Oxford University Press.

  • Berliner, L. M. and Goel, P. (1986). Incorporating partial prior information: range of posterior probabilities, Tech. Report 357, Department of Statistics, Ohio State University.

  • Bose, S. (1990). Bayesian robustness with shape constrained priors and mixture priors, Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • DasGupta, A. (1991). Diameter and volume minimizing confidence sets in Bayes and classical problems,Ann. Statist.,19, 1225–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • DasGupta, A. and Studden, W. (1991). Robust Bayesian experimental designs in normal linear models,Ann. Statist.,19, 1244–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRobertis, L. and Hartigan, J. A. (1981). Bayesian inference using intervals of measures,Ann. Statist.,9, 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J. (1983).Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and Its Applications, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, P. J. (1973). The use of Choquet capacities in statistics,Proc. 39th Session ISI,45, 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, M. (1991a). Sensitivity in Bayesian statistics: the prior and likelihood,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.,86, 396–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, M. (1991b). An approach to robust Bayesian analysis with multidimensional problems,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.,86, 400–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavine, M., Wasserman, L. and Wolpert, R. (1991). Bayesian inference with specified prior marginals,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.,86, 964–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, E. and Cano, J. A. (1988). Robust Bayesian analysis with ε-contaminations partially known, Tech. Report, University of Granada, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, A. and Berger, J. (1988). Ranges of posterior probabilities for quasiunimodal priors with specified quantiles,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.,83, 503–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasek, W. (1985). Sensitivity analysis for general and hierarchical linear regression models,Bayesian Inference and Decision Techniques with Applications (eds. P. K. Goel and A. Zellner), North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivaganesan, S. (1989). Sensitivity of posterior mean to unimodality preserving contaminations,Statist. Decisions,7, 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivaganesan, S. (1991). Sensitivity of some posterior summaries when prior is unimodal with specified quantiles,Canad. J. Statist.,19, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivaganesan, S. and Berger, J. (1989). Ranges of posterior measures for priors with unimodal contaminations,Ann. Statist.,17, 868–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, P. (1990).Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Sivaganesan, S. Range of the posterior probability of an interval for priors with unimodality preserving contaminations. Ann Inst Stat Math 45, 187–199 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00773678

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00773678

Key words and phrases

Navigation