“To choose a definition is to plead a cause...”
(Stevenson, 1944, p. 210)
Abstract
What are the implications of taking seriously Chaïm Perelman's proposition that “definitions are rhetorical”? Efforts to find Real Definitions are dysfunctional to the extent they direct argumentation toward pseudo “is” claims and away from explicit “ought” claims about how words are to be used. Addressing definitional disputes explicitly as propositions ofought rather thanis could put on the agenda the pragmatic concerns of definitional choice that might otherwise remain tacit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abelson, R.: 1967, “Definition”, in Paul Edwards (ed.),The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 2, Macmillan, New York, pp. 314–324.
Capron, A. M. and Kass, L. R.: 1972, “A Statutory Definition of the Standards for Determining Human Death: An Appraisal and a Proposal”,University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121, 87–118.
Converse, R.: 1975, “But When Did He Die?: Tucker v. Lower and the Brain-Death Concept”,San Diego Law Review 12, 424–35.
Culver, C. M. and Gert, B: 1982,Philosophy in Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford.
Currie, B. S.: 1978, “The Redefinition of Death”, in Stuart F. Spicker (ed.),Organism, Medicine, and Metaphysics, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 177–97.
Devitt, M.: 1984,Realism and Truth, Princeton University, Princeton.
Fine, A.: 1984, “The Natural Ontological Attitude”, in J. Leplin (ed.),Scientific Realism, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 83–107.
Gervais, K. G.: 1986,Redefining Death, Yale University, New Haven.
Gibson, R. F.: 1982,The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Goodman, N.: 1978,Ways of Worldmaking, Hackett, Indianapolis, IN.
Green, M. B. and Wikler, D.: 1982, “Brain Death and Personal Identity”, in D. J. Horan and D. Mall (eds.),Medicine and Moral Philosophy, Princeton University, Princeton, pp. 49–77.
Gregg, R. B.: 1984,Symbolic Inducement and Knowing, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Gross, A. G.: 1990,The Rhetoric of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Harré, R.: 1986,Varieties of Realism, Blackwell, Oxford.
Havelock, E. A.: 1963,Preface to Plato, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Humphry, D. and Wickett, A.: 1986,The Right to Die, Harper and Row, New York.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., University of Chicago, Chicago.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1977,The Essential Tension, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Lamb, D.: 1985,Death, Brain Death, and Ethics, State University of New York, Albany.
Margolis, J.: 1986,Pragmatism Without Foundations: Reconciling Realism and Relativism, Blackwell, Oxford.
Mulkay, M.: 1979,Science and the Sociology of Knowledge, Allen & Unwin, London.
Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: 1969,The New Rhetoric, J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver (trans.), University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame. Originally published in 1958 asLa Nouvelle Rhétorique: Traité de l'Argumentation, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1960,Word and Object, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1961,From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1969,Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University, New York.
Rescher, N.: 1987,Scientific Realism: A Critical Reappraisal, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Robinson, R.: 1953,Plato's Earlier Dialectic (2nd ed.), Clarendon, Oxford.
Robinson, R.: 1954,Definition, Clarendon, Oxford.
Romanos, G. D.: 1983,Quine and Analytic Philosophy, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA.
Rorty, R.: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University, Princeton.
Rorty, R.: 1989,Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Rorty, R.: 1991,Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Sayers, S.: 1985,Reality and Reason, Blackwell, Oxford.
Schiappa, E.: 1985, “Dissociation in the Arguments of Rhetorical Theory”,Journal of the American Forensic Association 22, 72–82.
Stevenson, C. L.: 1944,Ethics and Language, Yale University, New Haven.
Trigg, R.: 1980,Reality at Risk, Barnes and Noble, Totowa, NJ.
Veatch, R. M.: 1989,Death, Dying, and the Biological Revolution, rev. ed., Yale University, New Haven.
Veith, F. J. et al.: 1977, “Brain Death: A Status Report of Medical and Ethical Considerations”,Journal of the American Medical Association 238, 1651–1655.
Walton, D. N.: 1980,Brain Death, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
Weaver, R. M.: 1985 [1953],The Ethics of Rhetoric, Hermagoras, Davis, CA.
Weitz, M.: 1967, “Analysis, Philosophical”, in Paul Edwards (ed.),The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 1, Macmillan, New York, pp. 97–105.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1958,Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe (tr.), Macmillan, New York.
Zarefsky, D., C. Miller-Tutzauer, and F. Tutzauer.: 1984, “Reagan's Safety Net for the Truly Needy: The Rhetorical Uses of Definition”,Central States Speech Journal 35, 113–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schiappa, E. Arguing about definitions. Argumentation 7, 403–417 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711058
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711058