Skip to main content
Log in

Response of irrigated maize to urea-ammonium nitrate and ammonium thiosulphate solutions on a sulphur deficient soil

  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ammonium thiosulphate solution, (ATS, (NH4)2S2O3, 12% NH4-N and 26% S), is a nitrogen-sulphur fertiliser which can also inhibit nitrification, inhibit area hydrolysis and also solubilize micronutrients in alkaline soils. A three year field study was conducted in northeastern Italy to compare the growth, yield, and nutrient uptake of irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) fertilised with 250 kg N ha-1 urea-ammonium nitrate solution (UAN, 30-0-0) or UAN plus ATS. Dry matter (DM) yield, sulphur (S) and nitrogen (N) uptake were measured at several growth stages. Grain was measured and analyzed at maturity. Maize grain yield and N uptake were increased respectively 30.6% and 42.2% in the first year by adding ATS to UAN. Adding 10% by weight ATS to UAN (22.8 kg S ha-1) increased grain yields by 1.9, 1.7 and 1.6t ha-1 for the three years of the study. To distinguish whether the response was due to S or other ATS attributes, ATS was compared to an equivalent amount of S from single superphosphate (SSP). Plots fertilised with ATS gave grain yields 0.5 and 1.2 t ha-1 greater than plots fertilised with equal rates of S from SSP in the last two years of the study. This added yield from ATS over SSP may have been due to beneficial effects of ATS on N or micronutrient availability or to the split application of the S from ATS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AL-Kanani T, Mackenzie AF & Blenkhorn H (1990a) The influence of formula modifications and additives on ammonia loses from surface-applied urea-ammonium nitrate solutions. Fert Res 22: 49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • AL-Kanani T., Mackenzie AF & Blenkhorn H 1990b Volatilization of ammonia from urea ammonium-nitrate solutions as influenced by organic and inorganic additives. Fert Res 23: 113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JM, McCarty GW & Chai HS (1986) Evaluation of ammonium thiosulfate as a soil nitrification and urease inhibitor. Agronomy Abstract, p. 175. ASA, Madison, WI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie TE & Goos RJ 1986 Urea hydrolsis and ammonia volatilization characteristics of liquid fertilizer mixtures. II. Studies under modified field conditions. J Fert Issues 3: 86–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascho GJ (1986) Improving the efficiency of urea ammoniumnitrate solutions by adding other nutrients. J Fert Issues 3: 62–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascho GJ & Burton GW (1987) Nutrient addition to urea ammoniumnitrate for improving N management of Tifton 44 Bermudagrass. J Fert Issues 4: 86–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos RJ (1985a) Identification of ammonium thiosulfate as a nitrification and urease inhibitor. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49: 232–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos RJ (1985b) Urea hydrolysis and ammonia volatilization characteristics of liquid fertilizer mixtures. I. Laboratory Studies. J Fert Issues 2: 38–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos RJ Fairlie TE (1988) Effect of ammonium thiosulfate and liquid fertilizer droplet size on urea hydrolysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52: 522–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos RJ & Johnson BE 1992 Effect of ammonium thiosulfate and dicyandiamide on residual ammonium in fertilizer bands. Commun. Soil Sci Plant Anal 23: 1105–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano PL (1990) Improvement of nitrogen efficiency by addition of ammonium thiosulfate in the liquid fertilization of maize. Fert Res 2: 111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantzen HH & Bettany JR (1986) Influence of thiosulfate on nitrification of ammonium in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50: 803–806

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty GW & Bremner JM (1990) Evaluation of 2-ethynypyridine as a soil nitrification inhibitor. Soil Sci Am J 54: 1017–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Morden G (1986) The effect of thiosulfate on phosphorus availability and uptake by plants. J Plant Nutr 9: 1315–1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortvedt JJ & Giordano PM (1973) Grain sorghum response to iron in a ferrous sulfate-ammonium thiosulfate-ammonium polyphosphate suspension. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37: 951–955

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallade YE & Sims JT (1992) Evaluation of thiosulfate as a nitrification inhibitor for manures and fertilizers. Plant Soil 147: 283–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan DM & Havlin JL (1988) Agronomic use of ammonium thiosulfate to improve nitrogen fertilizer efficiency. J Fert Issues 5: 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan DM & Havlin JL (1992) Soil and environmental effects on urease inhibition by ammonium thiosulfate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 950–956

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan DM & Havlin JL (1992) Thiosulfate inhibition of urea hydrolysis in soils: tetraithionate as a urease inhibitor. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 957–960

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graziano, P.L., Parente, G. Response of irrigated maize to urea-ammonium nitrate and ammonium thiosulphate solutions on a sulphur deficient soil. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 46, 91–95 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704308

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704308

Key words

Navigation