Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring angling quality in count data models of recreational fishing

A non-nested test of three approaches

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a methodology for investigating different specifications of angling quality in recreational demand models. The methodology is used to compare three alternative specifications of the relationship between angling demand and site quality. The site quality alternatives include chemical concentrations, biological stress indices based on the chemicals, and catch per unit effort. The three alternatives are differentiated using a likelihood ratio non-nested testing procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Automobile Association Public Affairs Publications (1992),Your Driving Costs, Heathrow, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J., D. Bernard, S. Christensen, M. Sale, J. Freka, K. Heltcher, L. Rowe, P. Scanlon, P. Stokes, G. Suter, and W. Warren-Hicks (1990),Biological Effects of Changes in Surface Water Acid-Base Chemistry.State-of-Science/Technology Report 13, National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. and P. Trivedi (1986), ‘Econometric Models Based on Count Data: Comparisons and Applications of some Estimators and Tests’,Journal of Applied Econometrics 1, 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesario, F. (1976), ‘Value of Time in Recreation Benefit Studies’,Land Economics 55, 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, M. and J. Loomis (1990), ‘Modeling Hunting Demand in the Presence of a Bag Limit, with Tests of Alternative Specifications’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropper, M. and W. Oates (1992), ‘Environmental Economics: A Survey’,Journal of Economic Literature 30, 675–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and J. G. MacKinnon (1981), ‘Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses’,Econometrica 49, 781–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, J. and D. Rivers (1986),Statistical Software Tools, Pasadena, California, California Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, W. (1990), ‘Catchability of Three Strains of Cutthroat Trout’,North American Journal of Fisheries Management 10, 458–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englin, J., T. Cameron, R. Mendelsohn, G. Parsons, and S. Shankle (1991),Valuation of Damages to Recreational Trout Fishing in the Upper Northeast Due to Acidic Deposition, PNL-7683. Report to the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program.

  • Grogger, J. and R. Carson (1991), ‘Models for Truncated Counts’,Journal of Applied Econometrics 6, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linthurst, R., D. Landers, L Eilers, D. Brakke, W. Overton, E. Meier, and R. Crowe (1986),Characteristics of Lakes in the Eastern United States. Volume I: Population Descriptions and Physico-Chemical Relationships, EPA-600/4-86-007A, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morring, J. (1985), ‘Relation of Angler Catch Rates and Effort to Reductions in Numbers of Trout Stocked in Five Oregon Streams’,North American Journal of Fisheries Management 5, 575–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. (1988), ‘On-Site Samples' Regression: Problems of Non-Negative Integers, Truncation and Endogenous Stratification’,Journal of Econometrics 37, 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (1966), ‘Angler Success as a Quality Determinant of Sports Fishery Recreational Values’,Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 95, 357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuong, Q. (1989), ‘Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses’,Econometrica 57, 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Englin, J., Lambert, D. Measuring angling quality in count data models of recreational fishing. Environ Resource Econ 6, 389–399 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691821

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691821

Key words

Navigation