Skip to main content
Log in

An in vivo and in vitro trial of aclarubicin in metastatic breast cancer: a novel approach to the study of analogs

  • Original Articles
  • Aclarubicin, Human Tumor Colony Forming Assay, Breast Cancer
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Aclarubicin is an anthracycline antibiotic that differs from doxorubicin in its structure, mechanism of action, and preclinical toxicity profile, especially its reduced cardiotoxicity. We therefore conducted a side-by-side in vivo and in vitro trial of this agent in metastatic breast-cancer patients and their biopsied tumor specimens, respectively. Aclarubicin (100 mg/m2) was given by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks to 22 patients with objectively measurable metastatic breast cancer, 15 of whom had not previously received doxorubicin. The dose-limiting toxicity consisted primarily of leukopenia and severe nausea and vomiting. No objective response was observed in the 19 evaluable patients. After disease progression, 10 of the 15 doxorubicin-naive patients were treated with doxorubicin; 6 patients achieved a partial response, including 4 who responded to doxorubicin alone and 2 who responded to doxorubicin in combination with thiotepa and vinblastine. Tumor specimens were obtained from 14 of the 22 patients prior to the start of therapy and were tested for in vitro sensitivity to aclarubicin and doxorubicin using a soft agar colony-forming assay. Adequate colony growth occurred in 9 of 14 cultured tumor specimens. All 9 specimens, including 3 obtained from doxorubicin-naive patients, demonstrated in vitro resistance to aclarubicin. In all, 1 of 3 specimens taken from doxorubicin-naive patients demonstrated in vitro sensitivity to doxorubicin, whereas 6 tumor specimens obtained from patients who had undergone prior doxorubicin therapy demonstrated in vitro resistance. The patient whose tumor demonstrated in vitro doxorubicin sensitivity responded to a doxorubicin regimen after failing aclarubicin treatment; in vitro doxorubicin resistance correlated with clinical resistance in all cases. We conclude that aclarubicin is inactive in metastatic breast cancer at the dose and schedule used. Side-by-side in vivo and in vitro trials are feasible and could be useful in the development of investigational agents with activity greater than that of aclarubicin and, particularly, in the evaluation of analogs of clinically active drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alberts DS, Salmon SE, Chen HSG, Moon TE, Young L, Surwit EA (1981) Pharmacologic studies of anticancer drugs with the human tumor stem cell assay. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 6:253

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clinical brochure (July 1979) Aclacinomycin A (NSC-208734). Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

  3. Danchev D, Slioussartchouk V, Paintrand M, Hayat M, Bourut C, Mathe G (1979) Electron microscopic studies of the heart and light microscopic studies of the skin after treatment of golden hamsters with Adriamycin, detouribicin, AD 32, and aclacinomycin. Cancer Treat Rep 63:931

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorr RT, Bozak KA, Shipp NG, Hendrix M, Alberts DS, Ahman F (1988) In vitro rat myocyte cardiotoxicity model for antitumor antibiotics using adenosine triphosphate/protein ratios. Cancer Res 48:5222

    Google Scholar 

  5. Forastiere AA, Budman DR, Richards F, Aisner J, Weinberg V, Wood WC (1985) Phase II trial of aclacinomycin in advanced breast cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Cancer Treat Rep 67:1137

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gockerman JP, Raney M, Logan T (1985) Phase II evaluation of aclacinomycin in advanced breast cancer: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group trial. Cancer Treat Rep 69:1029

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heuson JC, Kamaoka S, Segaloff A, Rubens RD (1977) Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Cancer 39: 1289

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ogawa M, Inagki J, Horikoski, Inoue E, Chinen T, Ueoka H, Nagura E (1979) Clinical study of aclacinomycin-A. Cancer Treat Rep 63:931

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salmon SE, Liu RM, Casazza AM (1981) Evaluation of new anthracycline analogs with the human tumor stem cell assay. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 6:103

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salmon SE, Liu R, Hayes C, Persaud J, Roberts R (1983) Usefulness of abrin as a positive control for the human tumor clonogenic assay. Invest New Drugs 1:277–281

    Google Scholar 

  11. VonHoff DD, Casper J, Bradley E, Sandbach J, Jones D, Makuch R (1981) Association between human tumor colony-forming assay results and response of an individual patient's tumor to chemotherapy. Am J Med 70:1027

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wadler S, Fuks JZ, Wiernik PH (1986) Phase I and II agents in cancer therapy: 1. Anthracyclines and related compounds. J Clin Pharmacol 26:491

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Natale, R.B., Cody, R.L., Simon, M.S. et al. An in vivo and in vitro trial of aclarubicin in metastatic breast cancer: a novel approach to the study of analogs. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 31, 485–488 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685040

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685040

Keywords

Navigation