Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A phase III randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer

  • Report
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

One hundred patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomly selected to receive combined chemotherapy treatment with adriamycin (50 mg/m2) or mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2) associated with 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 21 days with a maximum of ten cycles. All patients included in this study were under 75 years of age and had ECOG performance status of less than 4. They had not been treated previously with chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, which could not have included anthracyclines, had to have relapsed at least 12 months after the completion of therapy. There were no statistically significant differences in pretreatment characteristics or metastatic disease location between the two groups. Ninety-four patients were assessable for response. No differences were observed in response rate or in survival between the groups. The response rate (complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)) was 68% (13% CR and 55% PR for CAF; 0% CR and 68% PR for CNF). Median survival for all patients was 19 months (18 months with CAF and 19 months with CNF). All patients were assessable for toxicity. There were no differences in gastrointestinal and cardiac toxicity. More grade I-II hematologic toxicity episodes (p < 0.001) and treatment delays (p = 0.05) due to leucopenia were observed with the CNF group, and more grade III alopecia (p < 0.001) was observed with the CAF group. Patients received further therapeutic manoeuvres after finishing the study with a sequential treatment consisting of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy with mitomycin (M) -vinblastine (Vbl) (M 10 mg/m2 day 1, Vbl 5 mg/m2 days 1, 15 and 29; maximum 5 cycles). This chemotherapy treatment was received by 32 patients, with a response rate of 34% and grade III-IV hematologic toxicity of 37%. Treatment with CNF can be considered a good alternative to CAF for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. M-Vbl treatment is useful as second-line treatment in patients with prior adriamycin exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henderson IC: Principles in the management of metastatic disease. Chemotherapy for metastatic disease.In: Harris JR, Hellman S, Henderson IC, Kinne DW (eds) Breast Diseases. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 1991, pp 604–665

    Google Scholar 

  2. Greenspan EM, Fieber M, Lesnick G, Edelman S: Response of advanced breast carcinoma to the combination of the antimetabolite, methotrexate, and the alkylating agent, thiotepa. J Mt Sinai Hospital 30: 246–267, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper RG: Combination chemotherapy in hormone resistant breast cancer. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 10: 15, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yap HY, Blumenschein GR, Schell FC, Buzdar AU, Valdivieso M, Bodey GP: Dihydroxyanthracenedione: A promising new drug in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 95: 694–697, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bull J, Tormey D, Li SH, Carbone PP, Falkson G, Blom J, Perlin E, Simon R: A randomized comparative trial of Adriamycin versus methotrexate in combination drug therapy. Cancer 41: 1649–1657, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tormey DC, Weinberg VE, Leone LA, Glidewell OJ, Perloff M, Kennedy BJ, Cortes E, Silver RT, Weiss RB, Aisner J, Holland JF: A comparison of intermittent vs continuous and of Adriamycin vs methotrexate 5-drug chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Am J Clin Oncol 7: 231–239, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holmes FA, Yap H-Y, Esparza L, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN, Blumenschein GR: Mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of hormone unresponsive metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 11: 28–31, 1984 (suppl 1)

    Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization WHO Handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva, WHO offset publication, n° 48, 1979

  9. Fisher RA: Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, 1934

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pagano M, Halvorsen KT: An algorithm for finding the exact significance levels of rxc contingency tables. J Am Stat Assoc 76: 931–934, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457–481, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peto R, Peto J: Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc (A) 135: 185–206, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  13. Breslow N: Comparison of survival curves. In: Buyse ME, Staqut MJ, Sylvester RJ (eds) Cancer Clinical Trials, Methods and Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1984, pp 381–406

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neidhart JA, Gochnour D, Roach R, Young D: A comparison of mitoxantrone and doxorrubicin in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 4: 672–677, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson IC, Wolff SN, Allegra JCet al.: A randomized trial comparing mitoxantrone and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In: Coltman CA Jr (ed) The Current Status of Novantrone. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985, pp 45–53

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cowan JD, Neidhart J, McClure S, Coltman CA Jr, Gumbart C, Martino S, Hutchins LF, Stephens RL, Vaughan CB, Osborne CK: Randomized trial of doxorubicin, bisantrene and mitoxantrone in advanced breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 83: 1077–1084, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett JM, Byrne P, Desai A, White C, DeConti R, Vogel C, Krementz E, Muggia F, Doroshow J, Plotkin Det al.: A randomized multicenter trial of cyclophosphamide, Novantrone and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Invest New Drugs 3: 179–185, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bennett JM, Muss HB, Doroshow JH, Wolff S, Krementz E, Cartwright K, Dukart G, Reisman A, Schoch I: A randomized multicenter trial comparing mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil in the therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 6: 1611–1620, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart DJ, Maroun JA, Hirte W, Perrault D, Stolbach L, Cripps C, Lefebvre B: A randomized comparison of cyclophosphamide-mitoxantrone-5-fluorouracil vs cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-5-fluorouracil in advanced breast cancer: preliminary observations. Semin Oncol 11: 23S-27S, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  20. Slater J, Green JA, Kelly V: Randomised trial of doxorubicin (A) against mitoxantrone (N) in combination in advanced breast cancer (abstract P-0885). London, Proc ECCO5, 1989

  21. Heidemann E, Steinke B, Hartlapp J, Schumacher K, Possinger K, Kunz S, Neeser E, von Ingersleben G, Hossfeld D, Waldmann R: Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with epirrubicin and with doxorubicin, each combined with cyclophosphamide in the first line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Onkologie 13: 24–27, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bailey N, Blackledge G, Chetiyawardana A, Larsson S, Latief T, Maciel C, Powell J: A controlled randomised study of cyclophosphamide and methotrexate together with either doxorubicin, epirubicin or mitoxantrone in advanced breast cancer (abstract P-0973). London, Proc ECCO5, 1989

  23. Haller D, Andersen J, Muggia F, Tormey DC, Falkson G: Chemohormone therapy with Adriamycin (A) or mitoxantrone (M) combinations in advanced breast cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 7: 19, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  24. Periti P, Pannuti F, Robustelli Della Cuna G, Mazzei T, Mini E, Martoni A, Preti P, Ercolino L, Pavesi L, Ribecco A: Combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and either epirubicin or mitoxantrone: a comparative randomized multicenter study in metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer Invest 9: 249–255, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  25. Follezou JY, Palangie T, Feuilhade F: Essai randomise comparent la mitoxantrone a l'adriamycine dans les cancers du sein evolues. Presse Med 16: 765–768, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  26. Buyukunal E, Derman U, Serdengecti S, Berkada B: A clinical trial of mitoxantrone (novantrone) versus doxorubicin (adriamycin) in combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Chemiotherapia 6: 377–379, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  27. Leonard RC, Cornbleet MA, Kaye SB, Soukop M, White G, Hutcheon AW, Robinson S, Kerr ME, Smyth JF: Mitoxantrone vs doxorubicin in combination chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the breast. J Clin Oncol 5: 1056–1063, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  28. Faulds D, Balfour JA, Chrisp P, Langtry MD: Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer. Drugs 41: 400–449, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  29. Denefrio JM, East DR, Troner MB, Vogel CL: Phase II study of mitomycin C and vinblastine in women with advanced breast cancer refractory to standard cytotoxic therapy. Cancer Treat Rep 62: 2113–2115, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  30. Konits P, Aisner J, VanEcho D, Lichtenfeld K, Wiernik P: Mitomycin C and vinblastine chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Cancer 48: 1295–1298, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  31. Garewal HS, Brooks RJ, Jones SE, Miller TP: Treatment of advanced breast cancer with mitomycin C combined with vinblastine or vindesine. J Clin Oncol 1: 772–775, 1983

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Oncology Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital de Sant Pau, Av. Sant Antoni Ma. Claret, 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain

    M. C. Alonso, J. M. Tabernero, B. Ojeda, M. Llanos, C. Solà, M. A. Climent, M. A. Seguí & J. J. López

Authors
  1. M. C. Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. M. Tabernero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Ojeda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Llanos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Solà
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. A. Climent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. A. Seguí
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. J. López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alonso, M.C., Tabernero, J.M., Ojeda, B. et al. A phase III randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Tr 34, 15–24 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666487

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00666487

Key words

Search

Navigation