Summary
An analysis has been made of the normal growth of the thoracic appendages in the pistol-crab,Alpheus dentipes. The chelae are the only asymmetrical appendages and, within an extensive size range, the growth-coefficient of the large chela (crusher) is smaller than that of the small chela (nipper), even in the most rapidly growing dimensions of the segment containing the growth-centre.
The partition coefficient for growth in certain dimensions of the chelae is not constant but is reduced progressively during the growthperiod, due (it is suggested) to the impracticability of maintaining the intensive heterogony developed during the early stages of growth.
Regenerative growth of the chelae has been studied quantitatively after autotomy of one, the other, or both normal chelae, effected once only or repeatedly as new chelae appeared at moulting. New chelae are regenerated repeatedly with little or no waning of growth intensity but in continuously growing chelae, growth intensity is substantially reduced at the end of the instar of autotomy. The amount of growth is not correlated with thenumber of days available for regeneration. When both chelae regenerate simultaneously the larger one grows relatively slower than the smaller one to the end of the instar of autotomy but afterwards this condition is reversed. When the nipper alone is autotomised, growth of the crusher is inhibited and shrinkage may occur. Crusher autotomy, on the other hand, stimulates nipper growth and to an extent which varies with the dimension.
The problem of chela reversal has been discussed and certain suggestions have been preferred.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brooks, W. K. andHerrick, F. H.: The Embryology and Metamorphosis of the Macroura. Mem. Nat. Acad. Sci. Washington, 4. Mitt.5 (1891).
Bush, S. F.: Asymmetry and relative growth of parts in the two sexes of the hermit-crab,Eupagurus prideauxii. Roux' Arch.123, H. 1 (1930).
Bush, S. F. andJ. S. Huxley: Distribution of Growth Activity inEupagurus. Nature (Lond.)126, 16. Aug. 1930.
Darby, H. H.: The Mechanism of Asymmetry in theAlpheidae. Carnegie Inst. Washington, Pbl. Febr.1934, Nr. 435.
Dawes, B.: Gradients of Normal and regenerative growth in the pistol-crab,Alpheus dentipes. Roux' Arch.130, H. 3/4 (1933).
Emmel, V. E.: The Regeneration of lost parts in the lobster. Ann. Rep. Inl. Fish. Rhode Island35 (1904).
- The Relation of Regeneration to the Moulting Process in the Lobster. Ann. Rep. Inl. Fish. Rhode Island36 (1906).
Huxley, J. S.: Further Work on Heterogonic Growth. Biol. Zbl.47, H. 3 (1927).
- Notes on Differential Growth. Amer. Naturalist65 (1931).
—: Problems of Relative Growth. London: Methuen 1932.
Morgan, T. H.: Development of Asymmetry in the Fiddler crab. Amer. Naturalist57 (1923).
- Artificial Induction of Symmetrical Claws in Male Fiddler Crabs. Amer. Naturalist58 (1924).
Okada, Yo K.: Remarks on the Reversible Asymmetry in the Opercula of the Polychaete Hydroides. J. Mar. biol. Assoc. U. Kingd., N. s.18, Nr 2 (1933).
Przibram, H.: Die Scherenumkehr bei dekapoden Crustaceen. Roux' Arch.25, H. 1/2 (1907).
- Connecting Laws in Animal Morphology. Univ. Lond. Press1931.
Shaw, M.: A contribution to the Study of Relative Growth of parts inInachus dorsettensis. Brit. J. exper. Biol.6 (1928).
Tazelaar, M. A.: The Relative Growth of parts inPalaemoncarcinus. Brit. J. exper. Biol.7 (1930).
—: A Study of relative growth inUca pugnax. Roux' Arch.129, H. 2 (1933).
Wilson, E. B.: Reversal of Asymmetry inAlpheus heterochelis. Biol. Bull. Mar. biol. Labor. Wood's Hole4 (1903).
Zeleny, C.: A case of Compensatory Regulation in the Regeneration ofHydroides dianthus. Roux' Arch.13 (1901).
- Compensatory Regulation. J. of exper. Zool.2 (1905).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dawes, B. A study of normal and regenerative growth in the pistol-crab, alpheus dentipes (Guèr.), with special reference to the phenomenon of chela reversal. W. Roux' Archiv f. Entwicklungsmechanik 131, 543–574 (1934). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00650109
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00650109