Skip to main content
Log in

Solute-solute interactions in non-aqueous solvents. Enthalpic interaction coefficients of substituted acetamides dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enthalpies of dilution of acetamide, N-methylacetamide, N-ethylacetamide, N-propylacetamide, N-butylacetamide, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-diethylacetamide, N,N-dipropylacetamide and N,N-dibutylacetamide dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide as solvent have been measured calorimetrically at 25°C. The results are interpreted in terms of the McMillan-Mayer theory. The enthalpic interaction parameters are obtained for pairs, triplets and some quadruplets of solute molecules. All enthalpic pair interaction coefficients but one in this non-aqueous solvent are negative, whereas the triplet coefficients are positive. The concept of ‘solvophobic interaction’ can be used to explain these results in connection with the assumption of the formation of solute-solvent associates. The enthalpic pair interaction coefficients can be described by the additivity approach of Savage and Wood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. C. Kresheck and I. M. Klotz,Biochemistry 8, 8 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. G. McMillan, Jr. and J. E. Mayer,J. Chem. Phys. 13, 276 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. L. Friedman,J. Chem. Phys. 32, 1351 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. L. Friedman,Ionic Solution Theory, (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. de Visser and G. Somsen,J. Solution Chem. 8, 593 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. Sen,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 2531 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. U. Sen,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 2181 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. B. Cassel and R. H. Wood,J. Phys. Chem. 78, 2460 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. L. Friedman and C. V. Krishnan,J. Solution Chem. 2, 119 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. J. M. Heuvelsland, C. de Visser, and G. Somsen,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 77, 1191 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. E. Desnoyers, G. Perron, L. Avédikian, and J-P. Morel,J. Solution Chem. 5, 631 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. R. Giaquinto, Ph.D. Thesis 1973, University of Connecticut.

  13. J. C. Verhoef and E. Barendrecht,Anal. Chim. Acta 94, 395 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Wadso,Acta Chem. Scand. 22, 927 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Tumerman and R. Zidovezki,Science Tools 23, 33 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Hamilton and R. H. Stokes,J. Solution Chem. 1, 223 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. J. Savage and R. H. Wood,J. Solution Chem. 5, 733 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. T. Gucker and H. B. Pickard,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 62, 1464 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. S. Frank and M. W. Evans,J. Chem. Phys. 13, 507 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Kauzmann,Adv. Protein Chem. 14, 1 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. W. Gurney,Ionic Processes in Solution, (Dover, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. J. Kozak, W. S. Knight, and W. Kauzmann,J. Chem. Phys. 48, 675 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Yaacobi and A. Ben-Naim,J. Phys. Chem. 78, 175 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Q. D. Craft and R. H. Wood,J. Solution. Chem. 6, 525 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. B. Homer and C. D. Johnson, inThe Chemistry of Amides, J. Zabicky, ed., (Interscience, New York, 1970), p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. D. Joesten and L. J. Schaad,Hydrogen Bonding, p. 601 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Davies and D. H. Thomas,J. Phys. Chem. 60, 676 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  28. C. de Visser, W. J. M. Heuvelsland, and G. Somsen,J. Solution Chem. 7, 193 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. H. Wood and L. H. Hiltzik,J. Solution Chem. 9, 45 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. M. Blackburn, T. H. Lilley, and E. Walmsley,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 76, 915 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. L. Harris, P. T. Thompson, and R. H. Wood,J. Solution Chem. 9, 305 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  32. B. Y. Okamoto, R. H. Wood, J. E. Denoyers, G. Perron, and L. Delorme,J. Solution Chem. 10, 139 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  33. I. R. Tasker and R. H. Wood,J. Solution Chem. 11, 295 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. Y. Okamoto, R. H. Wood, and P. T. Thompson,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 74, 1990 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  35. T. H. Lilley and R. H. Wood,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 76, 901 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  36. F. H. Stillinger, Science209, 451 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. R. Gough,J. Solution Chem. 8, 371 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  38. D. W. Davidson inWater: A Comprehensive Treatise, F. Franks, ed., (Plenum Press, New York, 1973), Sec. 3.6.6.

    Google Scholar 

  39. F. Franks, M. Pedley, and D. S. Reid,J. Chem. Soc. Faraday I 72, 359 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bloemendal, M., Somsen, G. Solute-solute interactions in non-aqueous solvents. Enthalpic interaction coefficients of substituted acetamides dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide. J Solution Chem 12, 83–99 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00645350

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00645350

Key words

Navigation