Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life among children in the Nordic countries

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is a concept with no generally accepted definition. Most clinical studies have had an individual approach where demographic and socioeconomic population aspects have not been considered. QOL has hardly ever been used in studies of children. In this study QOL is defined as the essential resources of a child population, expressed in external, inter-personal and personal conditions. Both objective conditions and the corresponding subjective perceptions are included. A model for an empirical application is demonstrated on a random sample of 15,000 children in the five Nordic countries. The data were collected in a questionnaire mailed to the families of the children. The QOL was analysed in a normative way, where a base value was defined for each variable and the conditions of the children were compared to a Nordic standard for children's QOL. The results showed that children in the Nordic countries have a high QOL. The differences between the countries were rather small. Children in Sweden had the highest QOL, closely followed by children in Denmark and Norway, while children in Finland were in an intermediate position and the Icelandic children had the lowest QOL, mainly due to a lower level of satisfaction. This study can be considered as a base line study which later can be used in studies of time trends or in comparisons of groups of children such as children with special needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The OECD List of Social Indicators. Paris: OECD, 1982.

  2. MorrisMD.Measuring the Condition of the World's Poor: the Physical Quality of Life Index. New York: Pergamon Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Human Development Report UNDP. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

  4. UNICEF State of the World's Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.

  5. JordanTE. Developing an international index of quality of life for children: the NICQL Index.J Roy Soc Health 1983;4: 127–130.

    Google Scholar 

  6. NussbaumMC.The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. AllardtE.Att Ha, Att Älska, Att Vara. Lund: Aldus, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. NaessS.Quality of Life Research Concepts, Methods and Applications. Oslo: University of Oslo, Inst of Applied Social Research, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. KarnofskyDA, AbelmannWH, CraverLF, BurchenalJH. The use of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma: with particular reference to bronchogenic carcinoma.Cancer 1948;1: 634–656.

    Google Scholar 

  10. SchalockRL.Quality of Life Perspectives and Issues. Washington DC: American Association on Mental Retardation, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LindströmB. Quality of life—a model for evaluating health for all.Sozial Präventiv Med 1992;37: 301–306.

    Google Scholar 

  12. LindströmB, KöhlerL. Youth, disability and quality of life.Pediatrician 1991;18: 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  13. KajandiM.Livskvalitet. En Litteraturstudie av Livskvalitet som Beteendevetenskapligt Begrepp Samt ett Förslag till Definition. Uppsala: Psykologiska enheten, Ulleråkers sjukhus, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. LindströmB. Barnfamiljernas och barnens livskvalitet. In: KöhlerL, ed.Barn och Barnfamiljer i Norden. En Studie av Välfärd, Hälsa och Livskvalitet. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. AntonovskyA.Unraveling the Mystery of Health. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. WernerE, SmithR.Vulnerable but Invincible. A Longitudinal Study of Resilient Children and Youth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. RutterM. Resilience in the face of adversity.Br J Psychiat 1985;147: 598–611.

    Google Scholar 

  18. DahlinL, CederbladM, AntonovskyA, HagnellO. Childhood vulnerability and adult invincibility.Acta Psychiatr Scand 1990;82: 228–232.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Köhler L, ed.Barn och Barnfamiljer i Norden. En Studie av Välfärd, Hälsa och Livskvalitet. Teknisk del. Göteborg: Nordic School of Public Health, NHV-Rapport 1990: 2.

  20. LindströmL. Barns livskvalitet. In: KöhlerL, ed.Barn och Barnfamiljer i Norden. En Studie av Välfärd, Hälsa och Livskvalitet. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. CampbellMJ, MachinD.Medical Statistics: a Common Sense Approach. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vogel J.Att Leva i Norden. Copenhagen: Nordisk Statistisk Skriftserie54, 1990.

  23. ReidM, LandesmanS, TrederR, JaccardJ. ‘My family and friends’: 6 to 12 year-old children's perceptions of social support.Child Dev 1989;60: 896–910.

    Google Scholar 

  24. LindströmB. Børn og livskvalitet. In: FastingU, MichelsenN, SommerD, eds.Uppror fra Knæhøjde. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1988: (111–128).

    Google Scholar 

  25. BirdwoodGFB, ed.Quality of Life-How it can be Assessed and Improved. Cardiovascular Problems in Everyday Practice. Basel: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. HollandsworthJ. Evaluating the impact of medical treatment on the quality of life: a 5 year update.Soc Sci Med 1988;26: 425–434.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindström, B., Eriksson, B. Quality of life among children in the Nordic countries. Qual Life Res 2, 23–32 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642886

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00642886

Key words

Navigation