Summary
We have carried out a study to evaluate the interference by cephalosporins with the measurement of creatinine by desk-top analyzers. The cephalosporins evaluated at concentrations of 0–250 mg/l were cefazolin sodium, cefoxitin sodium, cefotaxime sodium, and ceftazidime pentahydrate. The instruments evaluated were DT60 (Kodak, Rochester, USA), Seralyzer (Ames Division, Miles Laboratories, IN, USA), and Vision (Abbott Labs, Chicago, USA). All studies were done in plasma.
None of the cephalosporins showed any interference with the DT60 analyzer. With the Vision and Seralyzer no interference was seen with cefotaxime or cefazolin. With cefazolin an increase of 10–20 µmol/l creatinine was seen for every 20 mg/l of drug; with cefoxitin there was an increase of 50–80 µmol/l of creatinine for every 100 mg/l of drug.
Erroneous creatinine values may be found in patients taking cefazolin and cefoxitin and may lead to inappropriate clinical management.
References
Swain RR, Briggs SL (1977) Positive interference with the Jaffé reaction by cephalosporin antibiotics. Clin Chem 23: 1340–1342
Saah AJ, Kock TR, Drusano GL (1982) Cefoxitin falsely elevates creatinine levels. J Am Med Assoc 247: 205–206
Letellier G, Desjarlais F (1985 Analytical interference of drugs in clinical chemistry. Clin Biochem 18: 352–356
Hyneck ML, Berardi RR, Johnson RM (1981) Interference of cephalosporins and cefotoxin with serum creatinine determination. Am J Hosp Pharm 38: 1348–1352
Belsey R, Baer D, Sewell D (1986) Laboratory test analysis near the patient. J Am Med Assoc 255: 775–786
Marks V (1983) Clinical biochemistry nearer the patient. Br Med J 286: 1166–1167
Kroll MH, Elin RJ (1983) Mechanism of cefotoxitin and cephalothin interference with the Jaffé method for creatinine. Clin Chem 29: 2044–2048
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nanji, A.A., Poon, R. & Hinberg, I. Interference by cephalosporins with creatinine measurement by desk-top analyzers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33, 427–429 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00637643
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00637643