Skip to main content
Log in

Diurnal changes in photoreceptor sensitivity in a reflecting superposition eye

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Intracellular recordings of intensity response functions (V/log I curves) were made at different adaptation states at different times during a 24th period, from single photoreceptors in the central region of the eye of the Australian crayfishCherax destructor (Clark 1936).

  2. 2.

    The intensity that elicits a criterion response (50% of the maximum) is less at night than in the day in both the dark-adapted (DA) and lightadapted (LA) states.

  3. 3.

    Within the first 30 s of light-adaptation there is an extremely fast initial decrease in sensitivity, while in the latter stages of dark-adaptation there is a slow but steady increase, neither of which can be correlated with the position of the screening pigments.

  4. 4.

    The time courses for the movement of screening-pigment on lightor dark-adaptation during both day and night were measured using light microscopy. As found by de Bruin and Crisp (1957) in several species of prawn and Frixione et al. (1979) in the crayfishProcambarus, the proximal pigment migrates faster than the distal pigment on light-adaptation. On dark-adaptation, the distal pigment migrates faster than the proximal pigment, the latter only carrying out the first stage of dark-adaptation during the day.

  5. 5.

    It is concluded that there are three variable systems affecting sensitivity in a reflecting superposition eye: (a) The effective rhabdom cross-sectional area as determined by the position of proximal pigment; (b) the blur circle diameter and intensity determined by the position of the distal pigments and the width of the clear zone, and (c) transduction gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LA :

light-adapted

DA :

dark-adapted

PPI :

Proximal pigment index

DPI :

Distal pigment index

References

  • Aréchiga H, Fuentes B (1970) Correlative changes between retinal shielding pigment position and electroretinogram in crayfish. Physiologist 13:137

    Google Scholar 

  • Aréchiga H, Fuentes B, Barrera B (1973) Circadian rhythm of responsiveness in crayfish visual units. In: Salanki J (ed) Neurobiology of invertebrates. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, pp 403–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Aréchiga H, Fuentes-Pardo B, Barrera-Mera B (1974) Influence of retinal shielding pigments on light sensitivity in the crayfish. Acta Physiol Lat Am 24:601–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Aréchiga H, Wiersma CAG (1969) Circadian rhythm of responsiveness in crayfish visual units. J Neurobiol 1:71–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera-Mera B (1976) Effects of cerebroid ganglion lesions on ERG circadian rhythm of the crayfish. Physiol Behav 17:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruin GHP de, Crisp DJ (1957) The influence of pigment migration on vision of higher Crustacea. J Exp Biol 34:447–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson KP, McIntyre PD (1983) Image quality and acceptance angle in a reflecting superposition eye. J Comp Physiol 151:367–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Doujak FE (1984) Electrophysiological measurement of photoreceptor membrane dichroism and polarization sensitivity in a grapsid crab. J Comp Physiol A 154:597–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi E (1965) Rhabdom structure and receptor potentials in single crayfish retinular cells. J Cell Comp Physiol 66:411–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Frixione E, Aréchiga H, Tsutsumi V (1979) Photomechanical migrations of pigment granules in insect superposition eyes. J Neurobiol 10:573–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuortes MGF, Hodgkin AL (1964) Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia ofLimulus. J Physiol 172:239–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuortes MGF, Yeandle S (1964) Probability of occurrence of discrete potential waves in the eye ofLimulus. J Gen Physiol 47:443–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz RM (1968) Light adaptation in the photoreceptor of the crayfish,Procambarus clarki. Vision Res 8:1407–1421

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz RM (1972) Visual adaptation: a case of non-linear summation. Vision Res 12:103–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund G (1966) Pigment migration, light screening and receptor sensitivity in the compound eye of nocturnal Lepidoptera. Acta Physiol Scand 69:5–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge GA, Mimura K, Hardie RC (1976) Fly photoreceptors III. Angular sensitivity as a function of wavelength and the limits of resolution. Proc R Soc Lond B 194:151–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan E, Barlow RB (1980) Circadian clock inLimulus brain increases response and decreases noise of retinal photoreceptors. Nature 286:393–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Nirschfeld K (1974) The absolute sensitivity of lens and compound eyes. Z Naturforsch 29c: 592–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF (1981) Optics and vision in invertebrates. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates. Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6B. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 471–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Larimer JL, Smith JTF (1980) Circadian rhythm of retinal sensitivity in crayfish: Modulation by the cerebral and optic ganglia. J Comp Physiol 136:313–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB, Hardie RC (1978) Common strategies for light adaptation in the peripheral visual systems of fly and dragonfly. J Comp Physiol 128:319–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilly-white PG (1977) Single photon signals and transduction in an insect eye. J Comp Physiol 122:189–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Matić T, Laughlin SB (1981) Changes in intensity-response function of an insect's photoreceptors due to light adaptation. J Comp Physiol 145:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivo RF, Larsen ME (1978) Brief exposure to light initiates screening pigment migration in retinula cells of the crayfishProcambarus. J Comp Physiol 125:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Page TL, Larimer JL (1975) Neural control of circadian rhythmicity in the crayfis. II. The ERG amplitude rhythm. J Comp Physiol 97:81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez JA, Fuentes-Pardo B (1977) Circadian rhythm in the amplitude of the electroretinogram in the isolated eyestalk of the crayfish. Comp Biochem Physiol 56A:601–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholes JH (1965) Discrete sub-threshold potentials from the dimly lit insect eye. Nature 202:572–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder A (1979) The physics of vision in compound eyes. In: Autrum H (ed) Vision in invertebrates. Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6 A. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 225–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt K (1975) Zur Optik des Flußkrebsauges. Z Naturforsch 30c:691

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott B (1971) Unit studies on the receptor movement in the retina ofLethocerus (Belostomatidae, Hemiptera). Z Vergl Physiol 74:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Walcott B (1974) Unit studies on light-adaptation in the retina of the crayfishCherax destructor. J Comp Physiol 94:207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeandle TC (1958) Evidence of quantized slow potentials in the eye ofLimulus. Am J Ophthalmol 46:82–86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bryceson, K.P. Diurnal changes in photoreceptor sensitivity in a reflecting superposition eye. J. Comp. Physiol. 158, 573–582 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603801

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603801

Keywords