Skip to main content
Log in

A new clustering methodology for the analysis of sorted or categorized stimuli

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a new stochastic clustering methodology devised for the analysis of categorized or sorted data. The methodology reveals consumers' common category knowledge as well as individual differences in using this knowledge for classifying brands in a designated product class. A small study involving the categorization of 28 brands of U.S. automobiles is presented where the results of the proposed methodology are compared with those obtained from KMEANS clustering. Finally, directions for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1974), “A New Look at Statistical Model Identification,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19 716–723.

  • CarrollJ. D., and ArabieP. (1983). “INDCLUS: An Individual Differen es Generalization of the ADCLUS Model and the MAPCLUS Algorithm,”Psychometrika 48, 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo, W. S., Steckel, J., and Jedidi, K. (1991). “MICROSCALE: A Stochastic Multidimensional Scaling Procedure for the Empirical Determination of Convex Indifference Curves of Preference/Choice Analysis,”Psychometrika, forthcoming.

  • GillP. E., MurrayW., and WrightM. H. (1981).Practical Optimization, Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HortonM. S., and MarkmanE. M. (1980). “Developmental Differences in the Acquisition of Basic and Superordinate Categories,”Child Development 51, 708–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • HowardJ. A. (1989).Consumer Behavior in Marketing Strategy, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • JohnsonM. D., LehmannD. R., and HorneD. R. (1990). “The effects of fatigue on judgments of interproduct similarity,”International Journal of Research in Marketing 7, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JohnsonS. C. (1967). “Hierarchical Clustering Schemes,”Psychometrika 32, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KruskalJ. B. (1964). “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis,”Psychometrika 29, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MedinD. L., and SmithE. E. (1984). “Concepts and Concept Formation,”Annual Review of Psychology 35, 113–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MervisC. B., and RoschE. (1981). “Categorization of Natural Objects,”Annual Review of Psychology 32, 89–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PowellM. J. D. (1977). “Restart Procedures for the Conjugate Gradient Method,”Mathematical Programming 12, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RaoV. R., and KatzR. (1971). “Alternative Multidimensional Scaling Methods for Large Stimulus Sets,”Journal of Marketing Research 8, 488–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RoschE. (1975). “Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 192–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RoschE. (1977). “Human Categorization,” in W.Warren (ed.),Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology: Volume 1, London: Academic Press, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • SattathS., and TverskyA. (1977). “Additive Similarity Trees”,Psychometrika 42, 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ShepardR. N. (1962). “The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function, I and II,”Psychometrika 27, 125–140 and 219–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ShepardR. N., and ArabieP. (1979). “Additive Clustering: Representation of Similarities as Combinations of Discrete Overlapping Properties,Psychological Review 86, 87–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SpäthH. (1980).Cluster Analysis Algorithms, New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • WardJ. H. (1963). “Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function,”Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Wayne S. DeSarbo is the S. S. Kresge Distinguished Professor of Marketing and Statistics, and Michael D. Johnson is Associate Professor of Marketing, both at the University of Michigan's School of Business Administration. Kamel Jedidi is Assistant Professor of Marketing at Columbia University's Graduate School of Business. The authors gratefully acknowledge DuPont Incorporated for providing financial support for this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desarbo, W.S., Jedidi, K. & Johnson, M.D. A new clustering methodology for the analysis of sorted or categorized stimuli. Market Lett 2, 267–279 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404077

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02404077

Key words

Navigation