Skip to main content
Log in

A study of the foundations of ethical decision making of clinical medical ethicists

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study of clinical medical ethicists was conducted to determine the various philosophical positions they hold with respect to ethical decision making in medicine and their various positions' relationship to the subjective-objective controversy in value theory. The study consisted of analyzing and interpreting data gathered from questionnaires from 52 clinical medical ethicists at 28 major health care centers in the United States. The study revealed that most clinical medical ethicists tend to be objectivists in value theory, i.e., believe that value judgments are knowledge claims capable of being true or false and therefore expressions of moral requirements and normative imperatives emanating from an external value structure or moral order in the world. In addition, the study revealed that most clinical medical ethicists are consistent in the philosophical foundations of their ethical decision making, i.e., in decision making regarding values they tend not to hold beliefs which are incompatible with other beliefs they hold about values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Self DJ. A study of the foundations of ethical decision-making of physicians. Theor Med 1983;4:57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Self DJ. A study of the foundations of ethical decision-making of nurses. Theor Med 1987;8:85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bickel J. Integrating Human Values Teaching Programs Into Medical Students' Clinical Education. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pellegrino ED, McElhinney TK. Teaching Ethics, the Humanities, and Human Values in Medical Schools: A Ten-year Overview. Washington DC: Society for Health and Human Values, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Adams EM. The Grounds of Ethics, (unpublished manuscript). Chapel Hill: Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina, USA.

  6. Skeel JD, Self DJ. Ethics in the clinical setting. In: Fletcher J, Quist N, Jonsen A, eds. Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1989:53–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Skeel JD, Self DJ. A Description of Humanist Scholars in the Clinical Setting, (unpublished manuscript).

  8. Self DJ. Inconsistent presuppositions of Dewey's pragmatism. The Journal of Educational Thought 1976;10:101–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Self DJ. Methodological considerations for medical ethics. Science, Medicine and Man 1974;1:195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Self DJ. Philosophical foundations of various approaches to medical ethical decision-making. J Med Philos 1979;4:20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Self DJ. Value Language and Objectivity: An Analysis in Philosophical Ethics. [Dissertation]. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Self, D.J., Skeel, J.D. A study of the foundations of ethical decision making of clinical medical ethicists. Theor Med Bioeth 12, 117–127 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489792

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489792

Key words

Navigation