Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of glass bioactivity on new bone development induced by demineralized bone matrix in a rat extraskeletal site

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of two kinds of bioactive glass and two kinds of phosphate-free glass on new bone development induced by dernineralized bone matrix (DBM) were studied in the rat abdominal muscle pouch model. After 8 weeks' implantation histomorphometric analysis revealed that the amount of new bone in DBM combined with bioactive glass was comparable to DBM without bioactive glass. DBM grafts combined with phosphate-free glass showed significantly less new bone formation. Scanning electron microscopic examination confirmed that new bone bonded to the surface of bioactive glass. The release of ions from the glass seemed to slow down after new bone had bonded to it. Exclusion of phosphate from a bioactive glass resulted in loss of ability to develop the Ca,P-rich surface layer needed for bone bonding. contains BMP and other growth factors capable of inducing bone formation when implanted in various sites in laboratory animals [17–19].

Bioactive glasses have several beneficial properties as a bone substitute. The crystal chemistry of the surface formed in in vivo apatite contributes to a high bone bonding rate [6, 8], and the rate of reactivity can be controlled by choice of glass composition [2]. In addition, bonding of glass to soft tissues has been reported [7, 20].

We have previously reported formation of new bone directly on bioactive glass, induced by DBM in rat muscle tissue [13]. In the present study, the effects of four different glasses on new bone formation in DBM were studied in an extraskeletal site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson OH, Karlsson KH, Kangasniemi K (1990) Calcium phosphate formation at the surface of bioactive glass in vivo. J Noncryst Solids 119:290–296

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson OH, Liu G, Karlsson KH, Niemi L, Miettinen J, Juhanoja J (1990) In vivo behaviour of glasses in the SiO2-Na2O-CaO-P2O5-A12O3-B2O3-system. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1:219–227

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson OH, Liu G, Kangasniemi K, Juhanoja J (1992) Evaluation of the acceptance of glass in bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med 3:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donath K, Brenner G (1982) A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. J Oral Pathol 11:318–326

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ducheyne P, Hench LL, Kagan A II, Martens M, Mulier JC (1979) Short term bonding behaviour of bioglass coatings on metal substrate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 94:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujiu T, Ogino M (1984) Difference of bonding behaviour among surface active glasses and sintered apatite. J Biomed Mater Res 18:845–859

    Google Scholar 

  7. Happonen R-P, Vähätalo K, Yli-Urpo A, Andersson OH (1992) Short term surface reactions of a bioactive glass implanted subcutaneously in rat. In: Yamamuro T, Kokubo T, Nakamura T (eds) Bioceramics, vol. 5. Kobunshi Kankokai, Kyoto, pp 185–190

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hench LL (1988) Bioactive ceramics. Ann N Y Acad Sci 523:54–71

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hench LL, Andersson OH, LaTorre GP (1991) The kinetics of bioactive ceramics. In: Bonfield W, Hastings GW, Tanner KE (eds) Bioceramics, vol. 4. Butterworth-Heinemann, Guildford, p 155

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kotani S, Yamamuro T, Nakamura T, Kitsugi T, Fujita Y, Kawanabe K, Kokubo T (1992) Enhancement of bone bonding to bioactive ceramics by demineralized bone powder. Clin Orthop 278:226–234

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lindfors N (1992) Bioaktiva glas och mjukvävnadsstudier in vitro. MSc thesis, Abo Akademi University, pp 24–28

  12. Lindholm TS, Urist MR (1980) A quantitative analysis of new bone formation by induction in compositive grafts of bone marrow and bone matrix. Clin Orthop 150:288–300

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pajamäki KJJ, Andersson OH, Lindholm TS, Karlsson KH, Yli-Urpo A (1993) Induction of new bone by allogeneic demineralized bone matrix combined to bioactive glass composite in the rat. Ann Chir Gyn 82 [Suppl 207]:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  14. Putte KA van de, Urist MR (1965) Osteogenesis in the interior of intramuscular implants of decalcified bone matrix. Clin Orthop 45:257–270

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reddi AH, Andersson WA (1976) Collagenous bone matrix-induced endochondral ossification and hematopoiesis. J Cell Biol 69:557–572

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reddi AH, Gay R, Gay S, Miller E (1977) Transitions in collagen types during matrix-induced cartilage, bone and bone marrow formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5589–5592

    Google Scholar 

  17. Takagi K, Urist M (1982) The reaction of the dura to bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) in repair of skull defects. Ann Surg 196:100–109

    Google Scholar 

  18. Urist MR (1965) Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 150:893–899

    Google Scholar 

  19. Urist MR, Silverman BF, Buring K, Dubuc FL, Rosenberg JM (1967) The bone induction principle. Clin Orthop 53:223–283

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson J, Pigott GH, Shoen FJ, Hench LL (1981) Toxicology and biocompatibility of bioglasses. J Biomater Res 15:805–817

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pajamäki, K.J.J., Andersson, Ö.H., Lindholm, T.S. et al. Effect of glass bioactivity on new bone development induced by demineralized bone matrix in a rat extraskeletal site. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113, 210–214 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00441834

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00441834

Keywords

Navigation