Skip to main content
Log in

Aberrant oogenesis in the patterning mutant dicephalic of Drosophila melanogaster: time-lapse recordings and volumetry in vitro

  • Published:
Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Drosophila females homozygous for the mutation dicephalic occasionally produce ovarian follicles with a nurse-cell cluster on each oocyte pole (dic follicles). Most dic follicles contain 15 nurse cells as in the normal follicle, but the total nurse-cell volume is larger in dic follicles; this is in keeping with the increase in DNA content recently described. However, the relative increase in oocyte volume during nurse-cell regression (from stage 10B onward) is not significantly larger in dic than in normal follicles. Time-lapse recordings in vitro show that, as a rule, both nurse cell clusters in a dic follicle export cytoplasm to the oocyte but nurse-cell regression remains incomplete at both poles and the persisting remnants of the nurse cells cause anomalies in chorion shape. The kinematics of cytoplasmic transfer are less aberrant at that oocyte pole which harbours the germinal vesicle. Possible links are discussed between these anomalies of oogenesis and the double-anterior embryonic patterns observed in the majority of developing dic eggs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bohrmann J (1981) Entwicklung der Follikel der Drosophila-Mutante dicephalic in vitro. Staatsexamensarbeit, Fakultät fär Biologie, Universität Freiburg

  • Bohrmann J, Kiefer G, Sander K (1986) Inverse correlation between mean nuclear DNA content and cell number in nurse cell clusters of Drosophila. Chromosoma (Berl) 94:36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings MR, King RC (1969) The cytology of the vitellogenic stages in Drosophila melanogaster. — I. General staging characteristics. J Morphol 128:427–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey A (1986) Ursachen und Auswirkungen der veränderten Follikelpolarität bei der Drosophila-Mutante dicephalic: experimentelle und morphologische Befunde. Dissertation, Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Freiburg, FRG

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey A, Sander K, Gutzeit H (1984) The spatial arrangement of germ line cells in ovarian follicles of the mutant dicephalic in Drosophila melanogaster. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 193:388–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Frigerio G, Burri M, Bopp D, Baumgartner S, Noll M (1986) Structure of the segmentation gene paired and the Drosophila PRD gene set as part of a gene network. Cell 47:735–746

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohnhöfer HG, Lehmann R, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1986) Manipulating the anteroposterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol 97 [Suppl]: 169–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohnhöfer HG, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1986) Organization of anterior pattern in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid. Nature 324:120–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt R (1927) Physiologische Theorie der Vererbung. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzeit HO (1986) The role of microfilaments in cytoplasmic streaming in Drosophila follicles. J Cell Sci 80:159–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzeit HO, Koppa R (1982) Time-lapse film analysis of cytoplasmic streaming during late oogenesis of Drosophila. J Embryol Exp Morphol 67:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzeit HO, Sander K (1985) Establishment of polarity in the insect egg. In: Metz CB, Monroy A (eds) Biology of fertilization, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 347–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalthoff K (1983) Cytoplasmic determinants in dipteran eggs. In: Jeffery WR, Raff RA (eds) Time, space, and pattern in embryonic development, vol 2. AR Liss, New York, pp 313–348

    Google Scholar 

  • King RC (1970) Ovarian development in Drosophila melanogaster. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • King RC, Rubinson AC, Smith RF (1956) Oogenesis in adult Drosophila melanogaster. Growth 20:121–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann R, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1986) The maternal gene oskar in Drosophila: oskar dependent activity is localized in the posterior pole plasm and required for pole cell formation, abdominal segmentation and embryonic polarity. Cell 47:141–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohs-Schardin M (1982) Dicephalic — a Drosophila mutant affecting polarity in oogenesis and embryogenesis. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 191:28–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohs-Schardin M, Sander K (1976) A dicephalic monster embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 179:159–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahowald AP, Kambysellis MP (1980) Oogenesis. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF (eds) Genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol 2d. Academic Press, New York, pp 141–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri WH, Mindrinos MN, Lombard MF, Margaritis LH (1979) In vitro development of the Drosophila chorion in a chemically defined organ culture medium. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 186:351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb JA (1969) Maintenance of imaginai discs of Drosophila melanogaster in chemically defined media. J Cell Biol 41:876–885

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs L (1978) Angewandte Statistik. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander K, Nübler-Jung K (1981) Polarity and gradients in insect development. In: Schweiger HG (ed) International cell biology 1980–1981. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 497–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Trepte H-H (1979) Rate of follicle growth, change in follicle volume and stages of macromolecular synthesis during ovarian development in Musca domestica. J Insect Physiol 25:199–203

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bohrmann, J., Sander, K. Aberrant oogenesis in the patterning mutant dicephalic of Drosophila melanogaster: time-lapse recordings and volumetry in vitro. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 196, 279–285 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395950

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395950

Key words

Navigation