Skip to main content
Log in

Acetabular supporting ring in total hip replacement

  • Clinical and Experimental Forum
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of 14 total hip arthroplasties with a Müller acetabular supporting ring including 3 primary and 11 revision arthroplasties is reviewed. This device was used in cases of acetabular bone deficiency, and bone raft was added in 11 cases. The mean length of follow-up was 39.9 months. Twelve patients had good or satisfactory results, while two operations failed. These results indicate that the acetabular supporting ring is a useful implant in cases with acetabular bone stock deficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry DJ, Müller M (1992) Revision arthroplasty using an antiprotrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 74:711–715

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brien WW, Bruce WJ, Salvati EA, Wilson PD, Palicci PM (1990) Acetabular reconstruction with a bipolar prosthesis and morseled bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:1230–1235

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eftekhar NS, Nercessian O (1989) Intrapelvic migration of total hip prostheses: operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 71:1480–1486

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fuchs MD, Salvati EA, Wilson PD Jr, Sculio TP, Pellicci PM (1988) Results of acetabular revisions with newer cement techniques. Orthop Clin North Am 19:649–655

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haentjens P, Handelberg F, Casteleyn P, Opdecam P (1986) The Müller acetabular supporting ring. Int Orthop (SHOT) 10:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harris WH (1993) Management of the deficient acetabulum using cementless fixation without bone grafting. Orthop Clin North Am 24:663–665

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hedde C, Postel M, Kerboull M, Courpied JA (1986) La reparation d'une cotyle par homogreffe osseuse conservée au cours des revisions de prosthèse totale de hanche (acetabullar allografting in the revision of loose total hip arthroplastics). Rev Chir Orthop 72:267–276

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hirst P, Esser M, Murphy JCM, Hardinge K (1987) Bone grafting for protrusio acetabuli during total hip replacement: a review of the Wrightington method in 61 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69:229–233

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hungerford DS, Jones LC (1988) The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin Orthop 235:12–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jasty M, Harris WH (1988) Results of total hip reconstruction using acetabular mesh in patients with central acetabular deficiency. Clin Orthop 237:142–149

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mendes DG, Roffman M, Silbermann M (1984) Reconstruction of the acetabular wall with bone graft in arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 186:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosson J, Schatzker J (1992) The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabular. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 74:716–720

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schatzker J, Glynn MK, Ritter D (1984) A preliminary review of the Müller acetabular and Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio support rings. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103:5–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Panski, A., Tauber, C. Acetabular supporting ring in total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116, 233–235 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00393718

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00393718

Keywords

Navigation