Skip to main content
Log in

Sudden change in a model of small firm growth

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A “catastrophe theory” model of small firm growth allows for an abrupt change in small firm size. The model permits only smooth changes in the endogenous independent variables, turnover and profitability, yet allows sudden changes in the level of assets, the size variable. But not all growth paths suggested by the mathematics are likely to be met in the real world. Nevertheless, there are feasible phases of steady growth as well as feasible phases during which “jumps” occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1987, ‘An Empirical Examination of Small Firm Growth’, Economic Letters 25(4), 363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1989, ‘Births and Firm Size’, Southern Economic Journal 56(2), 467–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aislabie, Colin, 1984, ‘On Modelling the Small Firm Growth Process’, in W. C. Dunlop and B. L. J. Gordon (eds.), Small Business Research: Proceedings of the Second National Conference, Newcastle: Institute of Industrial Economics, University of Newcastle, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aislabie, Colin, 1987, ‘The Entrepreneur and Small Firm Growth’, in C. A. Tisdell (ed.), Contributed Economic Essays: A Collection in Memory of Dr M. G. Kibria, Newcastle: Department of Economics, University of Newcastle, 157–175 (also published in Research Reports or Occasional Papers, Department of Economics, University of Newcastle, 144).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aislabie, Colin, 1990, ‘The Implications for Survival in Small Firm Failure Studies’, in K. M. Renfrew and C. McCosker (eds.), The Growing Small Business: Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference, Newcastle: Institute of Industrial Economics, University of Newcastle, 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Financing System, 1981, Financial Report of the Comminttee of Enquiry (Campbell Committee), Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, Joyce, 1983, ‘Small Business Bankrupcy and Failure: A Survey of the Literature’, European Small Business Journal 1(4), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binks, Martin, 1979, ‘Finance for Expansion in the Small Firm’, Lloyds Bank Review 134, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binks, Martin, 1980, ‘Expansion in the Small Firm: Some Problems of Finance’, Planned Innovation 3, 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, Calvin M., Jon W. Bartley, and Richard Ratliff, 1981, ‘Small Business Growth Characteristics’, American Journal of Small Business 5(3), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, William S., 1979, ‘A Discontinuous Macro Model’, Atlantic Economic Journal 7(2), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghes, D. N. and A. D. Wood, 1984, Mathematical Models in the Social, Management and Life Sciences, Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, Mark, 1982, The Enterpreneur: An Economic Theory, Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidley, J., P. Lewis, and P. Walker, 1978, ‘The Cusp Catastrophe as a Market Planning Aid’, Behavioral Science 23, 351–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Neil C. and Virginia L. Lewis, 1983, ‘The Five Stages of Small Firm Growth’, Harvard Business Review 63(3), 30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee to Review the Functioning of Financial Institutions, 1980, Appendices, Cmnd 7939 (Wilson Committee), London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, Paul B. and Malcolm King, 1988, ‘Organizational Characteristics and Small Firms' Performance Revisited’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 13(2), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. W., 1973, Economic Analysis for Management Decisions, Homewood, Ill: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, D., 1981, ‘Equilibrium and Catastrophes in Economics’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 28(1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., 1979, ‘Catastrophe Theory, Utility Theory and Animal Spirits Expectations’, Australian Economic Papers 18(33), 268–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isnard, C. A. and E. C. Zeeman, 1976, ‘Some Models from Catastrophe Theory in the Social Sciences’, in Lyndhurst Collins (ed.), The Uses of Models in the Social Sciences, London: Tavistock Publications, 44–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, Robin, 1963, ‘A Model of the “Managerial” Enterprise’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 57(2), 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, Robin, 1964, The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, Edith T., 1952, ‘Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm’, American Economic Review 42(5), 804–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Chad, 1982, ‘Stage Theories of Small Business Growth’, Management Forum 8(4), 190–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Chad, 1983, ‘The Small Business Finance Gap: Now You See It, Now You Don't’, Management Forum 9(2), 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Rein and J. Shulman, 1987, ‘Capital Structure of Growing Small Firms: A 12-Country Study on Becoming Bankable’, International Small Business Journal 5(4), 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Bruce D. and Bruce A. Kirchhoff, 1989, ‘Formation, Growth and Survival; Small Firm Dynamics in the U.S. Economy’, Small Business Economics 1(1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Gavin C. and Lowell R. JacobsenJr., 1988, The Small Entrepreneurial Firm, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scapens, Robert W., Robert J. Ryan, and Leslie Fletcher, 1981, ‘Explaining Corporate Failure: A Catastrophe Theory Approach’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 8(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, Sherrill, 1986, ‘Small Firm Expansion and Demand Uncertainty’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 33(2), 182–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanworth, M. J. K. and J. Curran, 1976, ‘Growth and the Small Firm — An Alternative View’, Journal of Economics and Business 13(2), 152–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J., 1985, ‘The Problems Facing New Firms [1]’, Journal of Management Studies 22(3), 327–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Thomas A. and Peter Arlow, 1980, ‘The Financial Implications of Growth’, Journal of Small Business Management 18(4), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vozikis, George S., 1984, ‘A Strategic Disadvantage Profile of the Stages of Development of Small Business: An Empirical Investigation’, Review of Economic and Business Research 20, 96–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, M. L., 1980, A Further Investigation of Gibrat's Law: A Small Firm Study, Unpublished M. Comm. Dissertation, Newcastle: University of Newcastle.

  • Weston, J. Fred and E. F. Brigham, 1981, Managerial Finance, 7th ed., Hinsdale, Ill: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeeman, E. C., 1974, ‘On the Unstable Behaviour of Stock Exchanges’, Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aislabie, C. Sudden change in a model of small firm growth. Small Business Economics 4, 307–314 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388625

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388625

Keywords

Navigation