Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptual differences of sales practitioners and students concerning ethical behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates specific behavioral perceptual differences of ethics between practitioners and students enrolled in sales classes. Respondents were asked to indicate their beliefs to issues related to ethics in sales. A highly significant difference was found between mean responses of students and sales personnel. Managers indicated a greater concern for ethical behavior and less attention to sales than did the students. Students indicated a strong desire for success regardless of ethical constraints violated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumhart, Raymond, S. J.: 1961, ‘How Ethical are Businessmen?’, Harvard Business Review 39 (July–August), pp. 6–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Steven N. and Earl A. Molander: 1977, ‘Is the Ethics of Business Changing?’, Harvard Business Review 55 (January–February), pp. 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, Lawrence B. and Shelby D. Hunt: 1985, ‘Ethics and Marketing Management: An Empirical Examination’, Journal of Business Research 13 (August), pp. 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, Lawrence B. and John J. Burnett: 1983, ‘Measuring the Importance of Ethical Situations as a Source of Role Conflict: A Survey of Salespeople, Sales Managers, and Sales Support Personnel’, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 3 (May), pp. 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, Douglas J.: 1988, Sales Management 3rd. ed. (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGeorge, Richard R.: 1986, Business Ethics 2nd ed. (MacMillian Publishing Co., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter: 1981, ‘What is Business Ethics?’, Across The Board (October), pp. 22–32.

  • Dubinsky, Alan J., Thomas N. Ingram, and William Rudelius: 1985, ‘Ethics in Industrial Selling: How Product and Service Salespeople Compare’, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 13 (Winter–Spring), pp. 160–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, Alan J. and Thomas N. Ingram: 1984, ‘Correlates of Salespeople's Ethical Conflict: An Exploratory Investigation’, Journal of Business Ethics 3(4), pp. 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, Alan J., Eric N. Berkowitz, and William Rudelius: 1980, ‘Ethical Problems of Field Sales Personnel’, MSU Business Topics 28 (Summer), pp. 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, Nina, Paula Dwyer, and Dave Griffiths: 1988, ‘A Big Gun Aims at Defense Contractors’, Business Week (April 25), pp. 100, 103.

  • Ferrell, O. C. and Larry G. Gresham: 1985, ‘A Contingency Framework For Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer), pp. 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich, John: 1989, ‘Teach Ethics? Don't Kid Yourself!’, Marketing Educator (Winter), p. 7.

  • Futrell, Charles: 1988, Fundamentals of Selling 2nd ed. (Irwin, Homewood, Illinois).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Eugene W., Jr. and Lowell S. Broom: 1988, ‘Attitudes Toward Ethics: A View of the College Student’, Journal of Business Ethics 7 (August), pp. 617–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Del I. and A. Benton Cocanougher: 1972, ‘Student Evaluations of the Ethics of Marketing Practices: The Role of Marketing Education’, Journal of Marketing 36 (April), pp. 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, Harvey W. and Henry P. Sims, Jr.: 1979, ‘Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 64(3), pp. 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby and Scott Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6 (Spring), pp. 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Thomas M. and Frederick H. Gautschi, III: 1988, ‘Will the Ethics of Business Change?’, a Survey of Future Business Executives’, Journal of Business Ethics 7 (April), pp. 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Craig, A. and Cindy L. Simonsen: 1989, ‘Unethical Student Practices Hint at Future Business Behavior’, Marketing Educator (Winter), p. 5.

  • Laczniak, Gene R.: 1983, ‘Framework for Analyzing Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Marketing 3 (Spring), pp. 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantos, Geoffrey: 1989, ‘Relative vs. Fixed Values: Choice is ‘Absolutely’ Clear’, Marketing Educator (Winter), p. 4.

  • Levy, Michael and Alan J. Dubinsky: 1983, ‘Identifying and Addressing Retail Salespeople's Ethical Problems: A Method and Application’, Journal of Retailing 59 (Spring), pp. 46–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, Charles S.: 1989, ‘Scenarios Jog Students' Ethical Sensitivities’, Marketing Educator (Winter), p. 4.

  • Newstrom, John W. and William A. Ruch: 1975, ‘The Ethics of Management and the Management of Ethics’, MSU Business Topics 23 (Winter), pp. 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, Carlton A., Milburn D. Wright, and Barton A. Weitz: 1988, Selling Principles and Methods (Irwin, Homewood, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Lyman W. and Lawrence E. McKibbon: 1988, Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, Donald P. and Eric Reidenbach: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concept and Application’, Journal of Marketing 51 (January), pp. 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, William D.: 1930, The Right and the Good (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, William J. and Richard H. Buskirk: 1987, Management of the Sales Force Seventh ed. (Irwin, Homewood, Il.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, Scott A. and Troy A. Festervand: 1987, ‘Business Ethics: Conflicts, Practices, and Beliefs of Industrial Executives’, Journal of Business Ethics 6 (February), pp. 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary: 1988, (G&C Merriam Company, Springfield, MA.).

  • Weis, Gary: 1988, ‘Is a New Scandal Building on Wall Street?’, Business Week (October 24), pp. 64–66.

  • Wood, John A., Justin G. Longnecker, Joseph A. McKinney, and Carlos W. Moore: 1988, ‘Ethical Attitudes of Students and Business Professionals: A Study of Moral Reasoning’, Journal of Business Ethics 7 (April), pp. 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, Mary, and O. C. Ferrell: 1982, ‘Role-Set Configurations and Opportunities as Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations’, Human Relations 7, pp. 587–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zey-Ferrell, Mary, Mark Weaver, and O. C. Ferrell: 1979, ‘Predicting Unethical Behavior Among Marketing Practitioners’, Human Relations 32(7), pp. 557–69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

James B. DeConinck is an Assistant Professor of Marketing at Central Missouri State University. Prior to obtaining his Ph.D. from the University of Arkansas, he held industry positions in transportation and professional selling. He has published in the areas of product liability, sales force motivation, and marketing ethics.

David J. Good is an Associate Professor of Marketing at Central Missouri State University. His Ph.D. is from the University of Arkansas, and, he has published articles about quotas, compensation and strategies in a number of journals. Prior to being in academics, he held positions in sales, sales management and marketing management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeConinck, J.B., Good, D.J. Perceptual differences of sales practitioners and students concerning ethical behavior. J Bus Ethics 8, 667–676 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384203

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384203

Keywords

Navigation