Skip to main content
Log in

The perceived legitimacy of managerial influence: A twenty-five year comparison

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examines perceptions of managers, nonmanagerial employees, students, and union officers regarding the legitimacy of managerial influence over various subordinate behaviors and beliefs. The results indicate that: (1) perceived legitimacy has decreased since a comparable study by Schein and Ott in 1962, (2) perceived legitimacy is generally related to proximity to the managerial role, (3) there is a high degree of consensus on the relative legitimacy of influencing various behaviors and beliefs, and (4) only issues of direct relevance to work and task performance are currently perceived as legitimate areas for managerial influence. Theoretical, research, and managerial implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwin, D. F.: 1988, ‘From Obedience to Autonomy: Changes in Traits Desired in Children, 1924–1978’, Public Opinion Quarterly 52, pp. 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aram, J. D.: 1976, Dilemmas of Administrative Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E.: 1986, ‘The Experience of Powerlessness in the Operating Core of the Machine Bureaucracy’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.

  • Barnard, C. I.: 1938, The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, G.: 1987, Professionalizing the Organization: Reducing Bureaucracy to Enhance Effectiveness, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierstedt, R.: 1964, ‘The Problem of Authority’, in Berger, M., Abel, T., and Page, C. H. (eds.), Freedom and Control in Modern Society, Octagon, New York, pp. 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., and Stalker, G. M.: 1966, The Management of Innovation (2nd ed.). Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M. R., Morgan, B. S., Foley, P. M., and Kaplan, L. B.: 1979, ‘Changing Employee Values: Deepening Discontent?’, Harvard Business Review 57(1), pp. 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D.: 1964, The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, R. B.: 1968, ‘Bureaucratic Socialization and Organizational Accommodation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 13, pp. 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, W. G., and Dyer, J. H.: 1984, ‘The M*A*S*H Generation: Implications for Future Organizational Values’, Organizational Dynamics 13(1), pp. 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, N. R.: 1988, ‘All Fired Up Over Smoking: New Laws and Attitudes Spark a War’, Time (April 18), pp. 42–48.

  • Heller, T.: 1985, ‘Changing Authority Patterns: A Cultural Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 10, pp. 488–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.: 1979, ‘Hierarchical Power Distance in Forty Countries’, in Lammers, C. J., and Hickson, D. J. (eds.), Organizations Alike and Unlike: International and Interinstitutional Studies in the Sociology of Organizations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L.: 1973, Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C.: 1979, The Culture of Narcissism, Warner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, A.: 1978, ‘Managerial Subordinacy: A Neglected Aspect of Organizational Hierarchies’, Academy of Management Review 3, pp. 220–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, S.: 1956, ‘The Effects of Changes in Roles on the Attitudes of Role Occupants’, Human Relations 9, pp. 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., and Schneider, W.: 1983, The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mael, F., and Ashforth, B. E.: 1988, ‘A Reconceptualization of Organizational Identification’, Proceedings of the Midwest Academy of Management, pp. 127–129C.

  • Merton, R. K.: 1968, Social Theory and Social Structure (rev. ed.), Free Press, Glencoe, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, H. A., and Burt, M. R.: 1974, ‘Legitimacy as a Base of Social Influence’, in Tedeschi, J. T. (ed.), Perspectives on Social Power, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 310–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, J. B.: 1971, ‘Changes in Student Attitudes Toward Bureaucratic Role Perceptions During the 1960s’, Administrative Science Quarterly 16, pp. 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, J. T., and Lorence, J.: 1979, ‘Work Experience and Occupational Value Socialization: A Longitudinal Study’, American Journal of Sociology 84, pp. 1361–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naisbitt, J.: 1982, Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives, Warner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ondrack, D. A.: 1971, ‘Attitudes Toward Authority’, Personnel Administration 34(3), pp. 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. B.: 1982, August, ‘Changing Managerial Attitudes in the Past Two Decades: A Narcissistic Trend’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New York.

  • Rosow, J. M.: 1979, ‘Changing Attitudes to Work and Life Styles’, Journal of Contemporary Business 8(4), pp. 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H., and Ott, J. S.: 1962, ‘The Legitimacy of Organizational Influence’, American Journal of Sociology 67, pp. 682–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wager, L. W.: 1971, ‘The Expansion of Organizational Authority and Conditions Effecting Its Denial’, Sociometry 34, pp. 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. M.: 1963, ‘The Limits of Authority: Barnard Revisited’, Public Administration Review 23, pp. 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. H., Jr.: 1957, The Organization Man, Anchor, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M., Jr., and Walker, H. A.: 1984, ‘Legitimacy and the Stability of Authority’, in Lawler, E. J. (ed.), Advances in Group Processes, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, Vol. 1, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Blake Ashforth is Assistant Professor of Management at Concordia University in Montreal. His research interests include the adjustment of newcomers to work, organizational socialization, and the dysfunctions of organizational structures and processes. His work has appeared in the Academy of Management Review, Human Relations, and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Raymond Lee is a doctoral candidate in Industrial/Organizational Psychology at Wayne State University in Detroit. His research interests include occupational stress and adjustment, work climate, and organizational socialization. His dissertation examines the antecedents and consequences of job burnout among supervisors in a large public welfare agency.

The authors are indebted to Gary Johns and Ed Schein for their helpful comments on an earlier draft, and to Barrie Gibbs, Ed Schein, Hal Stack, and Susan Taylor for very kindly assisting in the collection of data at their respective campuses. The data were collected while the first author was at Wayne State University, Detroit. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 1988 meeting of the Council on Employee Responsibilities and Rights in Virginia Beach, VA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashforth, B.E., Lee, R.T. The perceived legitimacy of managerial influence: A twenty-five year comparison. J Bus Ethics 8, 231–242 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383336

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383336

Keywords

Navigation