Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate Strategy and ethics

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate Strategy has emerged as a central metaphor for private-sector enterprise. Given inherent imperfections in markets, one important question to consider is how well the practice of Corporate Strategy contributes to social welfare. An account of the implicit morality of free markets is developed as a standard against which two particular, “second best” solutions to market imperfections — namely, American federal antitrust policy and Corporate Strategy — are compared. Corporate Strategy is subsequently evaluated in terms of the fundamental principles of Rawls' theory of justice. In both analyses, Corporate Strategy is found to depart significantly and systematically from the standards of social justice. An alternative principle, grounded in the concept of duty, is introduced as a means for reconceptualizing Corporate Strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, K. R.: 1980, The Concept of Corporate Strategy (Richard D. Irwin, Inc.).

  • Breit, W. and Elzinga, K. G.: 1982, The Antitrust Casebook (The Dryden Press).

  • Deal, T. E. and Kennedy, A. A.: 1982, Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life (Addison-Wesley Publishing).

  • Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman Publishing, Inc.).

  • Gewirth, A.: 1984, ‘The Epistemology of Human Rights’, Social Philosphy & Policy (Spring, 1984), 11–24.

  • Hirschleifer, J.: 1958, ‘On the Theory of Optimal Investment Decision’, Journal of Political Economy (August, 1958), 329–352.

  • Lipsey, R. G. and Lancaster, K.: 1956, ‘The General Theory of Second Best’, Review of Economic Studies, 11–32.

  • Lomasky, L.: 1984, ‘Personal Projects as the Foundation for Basic Rights’, Social Philosophy & Policy (Spring, 1984), 35–43.

  • Mack, E.: 1983, ‘Commentary’, Business & Professional Ethics (Winter, 1983), 36.

  • McMahon, C.: 1981, ‘Morality and the Invisible Hand’, Philosophy & Public Affairs (Summer, 1981), 247–277.

  • Porter, M.: 1980, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press).

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press).

  • Richards, D. A. J.: 1971, A Theory of Reasons for Action (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.: 1970, Economics (McGraw-Hill).

  • Schendel, D. E. and Hofer, C. W.: 1979, Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning (Little, Brown & Company).

  • Scherer, F. M.: 1980, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (Houghton Mifflin).

  • Williamson, O. E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Daniel R. Gilbert, Jr. is a doctoral student in the Strategic Management and Organization program, School of Management, University of Minnesota, and also serves as an Instructor in Strategic Management and a Research Associate in the Strategic Management Research Center.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, D.R. Corporate Strategy and ethics. J Bus Ethics 5, 137–150 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382755

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382755

Keywords

Navigation