Summary
Shell and habitat utilization are quantified for 12 hermit crab species occurring subtidally in the San Juan Archipelago, Washington. The mechanism of competition for shells between these species is investigated using laboratory experiments to determine shell preferences, shell acquisition rates, and rates of exchange of shells via shell fighting. This information is used to estimate relative intensities of inter- and intra-specific competition for shells between the species in this assemblage. In contrast to earlier findings on intertidal hermit crab assemblages, a significant number (5) of the species in this assemblage appear to experience a greater reduction in their shell supply due to members of other species than due to other members of their own species. The relative amounts of inter- and intra-specific competition differ greatly for different species in the community. The high average figures for interspecific/intraspecific competition are largely a result of the presence of three abundant and very generalized species. In spite of the large number of species and relatively high ratios of interspecific to intraspecific competition, the species in this group are not close to a limiting similarity in resource use. There is suggestive evidence that greater selection pressures for divergence in habitat use may have resulted in the lower amounts of overlap observed in intertidal hermit crab assemblages in previous studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams PA (1980) Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in a tropical hermit crab community. Oecologia (Berlin) 46:365–379
Abrams PA (1981a) Shell fighting and competition between two hermit crab species in Panama. Oecologia (Berlin) 51:84–90
Abrams PA (1981b) Alternative methods of measuring competition applied to two Australian hermit crabs. Oecologia (Berlin) 51:233–240
Abrams PA (1981c) Competition in an Indo-Pacific hermit crab community. Oecologia (Berlin) 51:241–249
Abrams PA (1982) Frequencies of interspecific shell exchange between hermit crabs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 61:99–109
Abrams PA (1983) The theory of limiting similarity. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 14:359–376
Abrams PA (1986a) Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition. Theoretical Population Biology, 29 (in press)
Abrams PA (1986b) An analysis of competitive interactions between three hermit crab species. Ecology (submitted)
Bertness MD (1981) Competitive dynamics of a tropical hermit crab assemblage. Ecology 62:751–761
Case TJ (1982) Coevolution in resource-limited competition communities. Theoretical Population Biology 21:69–91
Hart JFL (1982) Crabs and their relatives of british Columbia. Handbook, British Columbia Provincial Museum. Victoria, BC
Hazlett BA (1981) The behavioral ecology of hermit crabs. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:1–22
Kellogg CW (1977) Coexistence in a hermit crab species ensemble. Biol Bull 153:133–144
May RM (1972) Will a large complex system be stable? Nature (Lond) 254:137–138
May RM (1981) Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. 2nd ed. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford
McLean RB (1974) Direct shell acquisition by hermit crabs from gastropods. Experentia 30:206–208
Mueller LD, Altenberg L (1985) Statistical interference on measures of niche overlap. Ecology 66:1204–1210
Nyblade CF (1974) Coexistence in sympatric hermit crabs. Ph D thesis. University of Washington, Seattle
Orians GH, King CE (1964) Shell selection and invasion rates of some Pacific hermit crabs. Pacific Science 18:297–306
Ricklefs RE, Lau M (1980) Bias and dispersion of overlap indices: results of some Monte Carlo simulations. Ecology 61:1019–1024
Schoener TW (1970) Nonsynchronous spatial analog of ligards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51:408–418
Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39
Schoener TW (1982) The controversy over interspecific competition. American Scientist 70:586–595
Simberloff D, Boecklen W (1981) Santa Rosalia reconsidered. Evolution 35:1206–1228
Spight TM (1977) Availability and use of shells by intertidal hermit crabs. Biol Bull 152:120–133
Stevens BA (1925) Hermit crabs of Friday Harbor, Washington. Publs Puget Sound Marine Biological Station. 3:273–309
Vance RR (1972) Competition and mechanism of coexistence in three sympatric species of intertidal hermit crabs. Ecology 53:1062–1074
Yodzis P (1982) The compartmentation of real and assembled ecosystems. American Naturalist 120:551–570
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abrams, P., Nyblade, C. & Sheldon, S. Resource partitioning and competition for shells in a subtidal hermit crab species assemblage. Oecologia 69, 429–445 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377066
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377066