Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of judgements in adaptive testing

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a psychophysical experiment the observer is given the task to detect a signal or to discriminate two signals; the performance of the observer in this task is to be determined as a function of the physical parameters of the stimuli presented. To increase efficiency of testing, one stimulus parameter is controlled in such a way that the task is made more difficult when the observer performs well and made easier when he doesn't. The observer then forms part of a feedback loop, a part that is characterized by stochastic behaviour. In a well-designed experiment the parameter under study will continually oscillate around its “target value” (i.e., the threshold of detectability or of discriminability). This paper derives an expression for the equilibrium distribution of this parameter around the target point, valid for an extremely long experiment. The observer is described as a stochastic detector with stationary characteristics. In the experiment he is subjected to a number of trials with stimuli having constant parameters. A set of rules applied to the performance of the subject in a group of trials then determines in which direction the parameter under study is to be varied for the next group of trials. For a wide class of experimental designs the desired equilibrium distribution of this parameter can be found from a recurrence formula. The derivation of this formula is given.

Examples of application of this theory are presented. Equilibrium distributions computed from the recurrence formula are found to be good predictors of results of experiments carried out with a finite length. This result allows a deeper study of what constitutes the best procedural design in a given case. It is finally shown how the class of usable procedures can be enlarged by judicious combination of different types of rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • De Boer, E., van Aardenne, A.C., de Groot, W.H.: Automated pitch measurement (in preparation)

  • Campbell, R.A.: Detection of a noise signal of varying duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 1732–1737 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardozo, B.L.: Adjusting the method of adjustment: SD. vs. DL. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37, 786–792 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesteadt, W.: An adaptive procedure for subjective judgements. Perc. Psychophys. 28, 85–88 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H.H.: Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467–477 (1971)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H.H., Rabiner, L.R.: Use of a sequential strategy in intelligibility testing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42, 609–612 (1967)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smoorenburg, G.F., van Raaij, J.L., Mimpen, A.M.: De audiomaat. Een automatische audiometer voor de bedrijfsaudiometrie. (The audiomat: an automatic audiometer to be used in occupational audiometry). In Dutch, with English summary. IZF Report No. 1983-17 (IZF, Soesterberg, The Netherlands) (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.M., Creelman, C.D.: PEST: efficient estimates on probability function. J. Acoust. soc. Am. 41, 782–787 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Boer, E., van Breugel, H. Distribution of judgements in adaptive testing. Biol. Cybern. 50, 343–355 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336959

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336959

Keywords

Navigation