Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differential vulnerability to predation and refuge use in competing larval salamanders

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aquatic larvae of two species of salamanders coexist as a result of differences in their competitive abilities: Ambystoma talpoideum is a superior aggressor, whereas A. maculatum is a superior forager. I examined the behavioral mechanisms that permit these species to coexist with their predatory congener, A. opacum. I asked whether the two prey species differ in their vulnerability to predation and in their use of structural and spatial refugia when under the risk of predation; such inter-specific variation may allow predation to contribute indirectly to prey coexistence. Larval A. maculatum (the superior forager) was more vulnerable to predation by A. opacum than was A. talpoideum, and only the latter species significantly increased its use of structural refugia (leaf litter) in the presence of the predator. In pond enclosures, both species of prey exhibited diel patterns of microhabitat use; significantly more larvae occupied shallow regions of enclosures during the day and migrated to deeper water (a spatial refugium) at night. However, when considered separately, neither (1) the presence of a predatory larval A. opacum nor (2) an increased density of intra- and interspecific competitors significantly altered this habitat shift for either prey species. Rather, diel microhabitat usage in A. talpoideum was significantly affected by an interaction between predator presence and competitor density. My results demonstrate the importance of refugia to coexistence in this predator-prey assemblage. Furthermore, predation by A. opacum may mediate prey competition; that is, preferential consumption of A. maculatum may reduce the competitive impact of this superior forager on A. talpoideum, thus enhancing their coexistence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Branch LC, Altig R (1981) Nocturnal stratification of three species of Ambystoma larvae. Copeia 1981:870–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie ED Jr (1983) Antipredator adaptations of salamanders: evolution and convergence among terrestrial species. In: Margaris NS, Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki M, Reiter RJ (eds) Plant animal, and microbial adaptation to terrestrial environment. Plenum, New York, pp 109–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie ED Jr, Formanowicz DR Jr, Brodie ED III (1991) Predator avoidance and antipredator mechanisms: distinct pathways to survival. Ethol Ecol Evol 3:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodman RD (1992) The interactions of coexisting guild members: competition and predation in two species of Ambystoma larvae. Ph.D. thesis, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio

  • Brown JH, Heske EJ (1990) Control of a desert-grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science 250:1705–1707

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan BW (1993) Effects of enhanced lighting on the behaviour of nocturnal frogs. Anim Behav 45:893–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen B, Persson L (1993) Species-specific antipredatory behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant R, Collins JT (1991) A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SD, Walde SJ, Peckarsky BL (1990) Prey exchange rates and the impact of predators on prey populations in streams. Ecology 71:1503–1514

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortwright SA (1988) Intraguild predation and competition: an analysis of net growth shifts in larval amphibian prey. Can J Zool 66:1813–1821

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortwright SA, Nelson CE (1990) An examination of multiple factors affecting community structure in an aquatic amphibian community. Oecologia 83:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Fecner DH Jr (1981) Competition between and species: outcome controlled by parasitic flies. Science 214:815–817

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DF, Gilliam JF (1992) Nonlethal impacts of predator invasion: facultative supression of growth and fecundity. Ecology 73:959–970

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey JE, Stein RA, Thomas HM (1994) Assessing how fish predation and interspecific prey competition influence a crayfish assemblage. Ecology 75:532–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause G (1934) The struggle for existence. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JF, Fraser DF (1988) Resource depletion and habitat segregation by competitors under predation hazard. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size-structured populations: ecology and evolution. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy LM, Raymond LR (1980) The breeding migration of the mole salamander, Ambystoma talpoideum, in Louisiana. J Herpetol 14:327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA, Menge BA (1991) Species diversity: prey refuges modify the interactive effects of predation and competition. Theor Pop Biol 39:178–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Holomuzki JR (1986a) Predator avoidance and diel patterns of microhabitat use by larval tiger salamanders. Ecology 67:737–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Holomuzki JR (1986b) Effect of microhabitat use on fitness components of larvae of tiger salamanders, Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum. Oecologia 71:142–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1987) Prey communities in patchy environment. Oikos 50:276–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler SL, McPeek MA (1989) Predation risk and the foraging, behavior of competing stream insects. Ecology 70:1811–1825

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP (1984) Risk of predation and the structure of desert rodent communities. Ecology 65:689–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Brown JS (1988) Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:281–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Hasson O (1991) Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology 72:2249–2260

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler BP, Holt RD (1989) Predation and competition: the interaction of two types of species interactions. Oikos 54:256–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert W (1987) Vertical migration of freshwater zooplankton: indirect effects of vertebrate predators on algal communities. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 291–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler SP (1989) Behavioural responses to predators and predation risk in four species of larval anurans. Anim Behav 38:1039–1047

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1986) Relative importance of competition and predation: early colonization by seaweeds in New England. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 537–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ (1981) Predatory salamanders reverse the outcome of competition among three species of anuran tadpoles. Science 212:1284–1286

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ (1987) Salamander predation, prey facilitation, and seasonal succession in microcrustacean communities. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 174–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975)_ Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:2–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Cowan CA, Penton MA, Anderson C (1993) Sublethal consequences of stream-dwelling predatory stoneflies on mayfly growth and fecundity. Ecology 74:1836–1846

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1991) Behavioral response to predators reverses the outcome of competition between prey species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson L (1993) Predator-mediated competition in prey refuges: the importance of habitat dependent prey resources. Oikos 68:12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce CL (1988) Predator avoidance, microhabitat shift, and risksensitive foraging in larval dragonflies. Oecologia 77:81–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Power ME (1984) Depth distribution in armored catfish: predator-induced resource avoidance? Ecology 65:523–528

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1990) SAS user's guide: statistics, version 6 edn. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (1987) Interactions between fish and salamander larvae: costs of predator avoidance or competition? Oecologia 72:481–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (1988) Allotopic distribution of two salamanders: effects of fish predation and competitive interactions. Copeia 1988:290–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Wall SC (1993) Competition in two species of larval salamanders: a test of geographic variation in competitive ability. Copeia 1993:587–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987) Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University of New England Press, Hanover, pp 203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Kats LB (1991) Effects of refuge availability on the responses of salamander larvae to chemical cues from predatory green sunfish. Anim Behav 42:330–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Petranka JW, Kats LB (1988) The dynamics of prey refuge use: a model and tests with sunfish and salamander larvae. Am Nat 132:463–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK (1992) Field evidence for a cost of behavioral antipredator response in a larval amphibian. Ecology 73:704–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK, Werner EE (1990) Behavioral and life-historical responses of larval American toads to an odonate predator. Ecology 71:2313–2322

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Sredl MJ, Collins JP (1992) The interactions of predation, competition, and habitat complexity in structuring and amphibian community. Copeia 1992:607–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangel PW, Semlitsch RD (1987) Experimental analysis of predation on the diel vertical migrations of a larval salamander Can J Zool 65:1554–1558

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse SL (1985) Interdemic variation in predation on salamander larvae. Ecology 66:1706–1717

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse SL, Hairston NG, Cobey AE (1983) Predation and competition in Ambystoma larvae: field and laboratory experiments. J Herpetol 17:210–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenson JAE (1978) Differential predation by fish on two species of Chaoborus (Diptera, Chaoboridae). Oikos 31:98–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart MM (1956) The separate effects of food and temperature differences on development of marbled salamander larvae. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 72:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls SC (1991) Mechanisms of coexistence in a guild of ambystomatid salamanders: the importance of stage-dependent regulation in species with a complex life cycle Ph.D. thesis, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette

  • Walls SC, Jaeger RG (1987) Aggression and exploitation as mechanisms of competition in larval salamanders. Can J Zool 65:2938–2944

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls SC, Jaeger RG (1989) Growth in larval salamanders is not inhibited through chemical interference competition. Copeia 1989:1049–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1991) Nonlethal effects of a predator on competitive interactions between two anuran larvae. Ecology 72:1709–1720

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1992) Individual behavior and higher-order species interactions. Am Nat 140:S5-S32

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Anholt BR (1993) Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity. Am Nat 142:242–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1972) Competition, predation, and the structure of the Ambystoma-Rana sylvatica community. Ecology 53:3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1976) Density-dependent aspects of metamorphosis in Ambystoma and Rana sylvatica. Ecology 57:1289–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1988) Interactions between growing predators and growing prey. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size-structured populations: ecology and evolution. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM, Morin PJ, Harris RN (1983) Salamander predation and the structure of experimental communities: anuran responses. Ecology 64:1423–1429

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, The City College of The City University of New York, Convent Avenue at 138th Street, 10031, New York, NY, USA

    Susan C. Walls

Authors
  1. Susan C. Walls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walls, S.C. Differential vulnerability to predation and refuge use in competing larval salamanders. Oecologia 101, 86–93 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328904

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328904

Key words

Search

Navigation