Skip to main content
Log in

Noise suppression in scanning Auger Images — comparison of various digital filters

  • Poster Session A: Connected Layers, Development Of Processes And Microanalytical Methods
  • Published:
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Due to the small number of electrons collected for each pixel of the image, images from Scanning Auger Microscopy (SAM) are typically noisy. Therefore it is necessary to apply noise suppression techniques both to enhance the optical impression of the picture and to support further image processing methods, such as the analysis of scatter diagrams or segmentation, which are the basis for qualitative and quantitative investigations. A variety of techniques have been proposed to reduce noise in digital images. These can be judged according to their capability of smoothing noise inside homogeneous regions, preservation of edges, sensitivity to outlier contamination, ease of implementation and performance. During the segregation of sulphur in polycrystalline high purity iron, the SAM-images of sulphur show regions of different, homogeneous sulphur coverage [1], which correspond to grains and are sharply separated by grain boundaries. Several noise suppression techniques were applied to these images and the results were judged with respect to the above mentioned characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisl MM, Reichl BM. Böhmig SD, Störi H (1992) Surf Interf Anal (in print)

  2. Gonzales RC, Wintz P (1977) Digital image processing. Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walker CGH (1985) Inst. Phys Conf 78 (3):83–86

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peacock DC, Prutton M (1983) Inst Phys Conf 68:231–234

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chin RT, Yeh C (1983) Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 23:67–91

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mastin GA (1985) Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 31:103–121

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harwood D, Subbarao M, Hakalahti H, Davis LS (1987) Pattern Recognition Lett 6:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lønnestad T (1988) IEEE 9th Conference on Pattern Recognition: 848–850

  9. Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P (1985) IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 7 (2):653–665

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saint-Marc P, Chen J, Medioni G (1991) IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13 (6):514–529

    Google Scholar 

  11. Westman T, Harwood D, Laitinen T, Pietikäinen M (1990) IEEE 10th Conference on Pattern Recognition: 796–802

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Böhmig, S.D., Beilschmidt, H. & Reichl, B.M. Noise suppression in scanning Auger Images — comparison of various digital filters. Fresenius J Anal Chem 346, 196–199 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00321412

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00321412

Keywords

Navigation