Summary
The methodological quality of 50 clinical trial protocols submitted to our hospital has been assessed by means of a check-list.
The most frequent methodological deficiencies found were related to statistical analysis, selection criteria, sample size, incorrect use of placebo, homogeneity of the groups, concomitant medication, randomisation plan, monitoring of adverse events and study design. Lack of insurance for the patients and inadequacies in the investigators' brochure and case report forms were observed in a significant number of cases.
The results suggest the importance of a multidisciplinary team in the elaboration of clinical trial protocols to prevent methodological errors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Wulf HR (1975) Check-list for assessment of controlled therapeutic trials. Acta Neurol Scand 90: 79–80
Paynard T (1988) Evaluation de la qualité methodologique des essais thérapeutiques randomisés. Présse Med 17: 315–318
LEY 25/1990 (1990) Del Medicamento, BOE 22/12/1990
Spilker B (1984) Guide to clinical studies and developing protocols. Raven Press, New York
Pocock SJ (1983) Clinical Trials. A Practical Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
Lequesme M, Wilhelm F (1989) Methodology for the clinican. Compendium and glossary. Eular Publishers, Basel
Izquierdo I, Gallastegui C, Torrent J et al (1990) Valoración de protocolos de ensayos clínicos: experiencia preliminar en la utilización de un check-list. Rev Esp Farm Clin Exp 7 [Suppl 1]: 110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García-Cases, C., Duque, A., Borja, J. et al. Evaluation of the methodological quality of clinical trial protocols. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 44, 401–402 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00316482
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00316482