Skip to main content
Log in

Microassays for androgen and progesterone receptor quantitation as compared with standard saturation analyses in human prostatic tissues

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Simultaneous measurement of androgen and progesterone receptor content in cytosol and salt extractable nuclear subcompartments of benign hyperplastic prostatic tissue was carried out with various microassay techniques and compared to the results from analyses on bulky tissue from the same tissue specimens. The microassays were carried out as modified saturation analyses or as single concentration assays at various degrees of dilution with tris-EDTA-glycerol (TEG) buffer. Tissue samples for the standard assay weighed between 1.76 and 3.22 g, whereas the microassay samples weighed between 0.14 and 0.47 g. When considering the results of the standard assay as the “true” value, the microassays on the same tissue samples tended to underestimate both the androgen and progesterone receptor contents. Data from the microassays showed a wide variation of the androgen and progesterone receptor content in cytosol and nuclei. With the standard assay technique no detectable amount of progesterone receptor was found in the nuclei, whereas the microassays often indicated false-positive progesterone receptor content in this subcompartment. Therefore, the measurements of steroid receptors using biochemical microassays in prostatic tissue are unreliable and not suitable for clinical use, at least with the techniques available today. Reports in the literature based on such assays should therefore be interpreted with great caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aubel O van, Vries JB, Blankenstein MA, Schröder FH (1988) Prediction of time to progression after orchiectomy by the nuclear androgen receptor content from multiple biopsy specimens in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Prostate 12:191

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brolin J, Andersson L, Ekman P (1991) Steroid receptor profile and receptor stability in subfractions of human prostatic tissues. Critical aspects on microassays. Urol Res 19:327

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chamness GC, McGuire WL (1975) Common errors in correction and interpretation. Steroids 26:538

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ekman P, Brolin J (1991) Steroid receptor profile in human prostate cancer metastases as compared to primary prostatic carcinoma. Prostate 18:147

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ekman P, Snochowski M, Zetterberg A, Högberg B, Gustafsson JÅ (1979) Steroid receptor content in human prostatic carcinoma and response to endocrine therapy. Cancer 44:1173

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ekman P, Dahlberg E, Gustavsson JÅ, Högberg B, Pousette Å, Snochowski M (1980) Present and future clinical value of steroid receptor assays in human prostatic carcinoma. In: Iacobelli S, King RJB, Lindner HR, Lippman M (eds) Progress in cancer research and therapy. Hormones and cancer. Raven Press, New York, p 361

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ekman P, Barrack ER, Walsh PC (1982) Simultaneous measurement or progesterone and androgen receptors in human prostate: a microassay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 55:1089

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emtage LA, Dunn PJS, Rowse AD (1989) Androgen and oestrogen receptor status in benign and neoplastic prostate disease. Br J Urol 63:627

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hicks LL, Walsh PC (1979) A microassay for the measurement of androgen receptors in human prostatic tissue. Steroids 33:389

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirkali Z, Moffat LEF, Leake R, Cowan S, Patel M, Kirk D (1990) Androgen receptors — a method to measure functional behaviour in human prostatic cancer. Eur Urol 17:66

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scatchard G (1949) The attraction of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Acad Sci 51:660

    Google Scholar 

  13. Widdowson SM, Ostrowski JL, Dangerfield VJM, Harris SC, Ingleton PM, Underwood JCE, Williams JL, Parsons MA (1989) Microassay for prostatic androgen receptors correlated with quantitative histological assessment. J Clin Pathol 42:322

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brolin, J., Ekman, P. Microassays for androgen and progesterone receptor quantitation as compared with standard saturation analyses in human prostatic tissues. Urol. Res. 19, 333–336 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310145

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310145

Key words

Navigation