Skip to main content
Log in

Task and contrast effects on performance with parafoval stimulus pairs

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effect on both detection and identification of placing a non-target character to the foveal or peripheral side of the position of a parafoveally presented target character was examined in two experiments. The experiments found more interference with both tasks when the nontarget was peripheral to the target position, but only when the target and nontarget were both darker or brighter than the background. If one character was darker than the background, and the other was brighter, the asymmetry appeared in neither task. In Experiment 2, performance in both tasks was poorer when the two characters had the same features, but this effect was independent of both nontarget position and target-nontarget contrast. While these results are inconsistent with a feature-mixing explanation of the asymmetry, contrast-specific lateral inhibition can account for the phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chastain G (1981) Asymmetric identification of parafoveal stimulus pairs: Feature perturbations or failure in feature extraction? Can J Psychol 35:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Chastain G (1982) Confusability and interference between members of parafoveal letter pairs. Percept Psychophys 32:576–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummerman K (1972) A response-contingent measure of proportion correct. J Acoust Soc Am 52:1645–1647

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl CL (1977) Naming and locating simultaneously and sequentially presented letters. Percept Psychophys 22:293–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl CL, Thomas EAC (1977) Effect of level of confusability on reporting letters from briefly presented visual displays. Percept Psychophys 21:269–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson JG (1975) Receptive fields. In: Carterette EC, Friedman MP (eds) Handbook of perception, vol. 5. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Santee JL, Egeth HE (1982) Independence versus interference in the perceptual processing of letters. Percept Psychophys 31:101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • White MJ (1981) Feature-specific border effects in the discrimination of letter-like forms. Percept Psychophys 29:156–162

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chastain, G. Task and contrast effects on performance with parafoval stimulus pairs. Psychol. Res 45, 147–156 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308666

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308666

Keywords

Navigation