Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic polymorphism in varietal identification and genetic improvement

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

New sources of genetic polymorphisms promise significant additions to the number of useful genetic markers in agricultural plants and animals, and prompt this review of potential applications of polymorphic genetic markers in plant and animal breeding. Two major areas of application can be distinguished. The first is based on the utilization of genetic markers to determine genetic relationships. These applications include varietal identification, protection of breeder's rights, and parentage determination. The second area of application is based on the use of genetic markers to identify and map loci affecting quantitative traits, and to monitor these loci during introgression or selection programs. A variety of breeding applications based on these possibilities can be envisaged for Selfers, particularly for those species having a relatively small genome size. These applications include: (i) screening genetic resources for useful quantitative trait alleles, and introgression of chromosome segments containing these alleles from resource strain to commercial variety; (ii) development of improved pure lines out of a cross between two existing commercial varieties; and (iii) development of crosses showing increased hybrid vigor. Breeding applications in segregating populations are more limited, particularly in species with a relatively large genome size. Potential applications, however, include: (i) preliminary selection of young males in dairy cattle on the basis of evaluated chromosomes of their proven sire; (ii) genetic analysis of resource strains characterized by high values for a particular quantitative trait, and introgression of chromosome segments carrying alleles contributing to the high values from resource strain to recipient strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckmann JS, Soller M (1983) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in genetic improvement: methodologies, mapping and costs. Theor Appl Genet 67:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop D, Skolnick MH (1980) Numerical considerations for linkage studies using polymorphic DNA markers in humans. Banbury Rep 4: cancer incidence in defined populations. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, pp 421–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldermann H (1975) Investigations on inheritance of quantitative characters in animals by gene markers. 1. Methods. Theor Appl Genet 46:319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodzicker T, Williams J, Sharp P, Sambrook J (1974) Physical mapping of temperature-sensitive mutations of adenoviruses. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 39:439–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge R, Geldermann H (1982) Effects of marked chromosome sections on quantitative traits in the mouse. Theor Appl Genet 62:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Law CN (1966) The location of genetic factors affecting a quantitative character in wheat. Genetics 53:487–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather KM, Jinks JL (1971) Biometrical genetics. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan I, Robertson A (1974) The power of methods for the detection of major genes affecting quantitative characters. Heredity 32:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen JB (1975) Selection of dairy bulls on half-sister records. Anim Prod 20:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson FL, Schafer JF, Caldwell RM (1968) Effect of selected linkage blocks on yield and yield components in wheat. In: Finlay KW, Shepard KW (eds) Third Int Wheat Genet Symp. Aust Acad Sci, Butterworths, Canberra, pp 88–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver H (1978) Paternity testing. In: Silver H (ed) Seminar presented by the Committee on Technical Workshops of the Am Ass Blood Banks. New Orleans, Louisiana

  • Simmonds NW (1979) Principles of crop improvement. Longman Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M (1978) The use of loci associated with quantitative traits in dairy cattle improvement. Anim Prod 27:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M, Brody T, Genizi A (1979) The expected distribution of marker-linked quantitative effects in crosses between inbred lines. Heredity 43:179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M, Genizi A, Brody T (1976) On the power of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative loci in crosses between inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 47:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M, Genizi A (1978) The efficiency of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between a marker locus and a locus affecting a quantitative trait in segregating populations. Biometrics 34:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller M, Plotkin-Hazan J (1977) The use of marker alleles for the introgression of linked quantitative alleles. Theor Appl Genet 51:133–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon E, Bodmer WF (1979) Evolution of sickle variant gene. Lancet I: 8122:923

    Google Scholar 

  • Spickett SG, Thoday JM (1966) Regular responses to selection. 3. Interaction between located polygenes. Genet Res 7:96–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuber CW, Goodman MM, Moll RH (1982) Improvement of yield and ear number resulting from selection at allozyme loci in a maize population. Crop Sci 22:737–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, Rick CM (1980) Isozymic gene linkage map of the tomato: applications in genetics and breeding. Theor Appl Genet 57:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, Medina-Filho H, Rick CM (1981) The effect of isozyme selection on metric characters in an interspecific backcross of tomato-basis of an early screening procedure. Theor Appl Genet 60:291–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, Medina-Filho H, Rick CM (1982) Use of naturally-occurring enzyme variation to detect and map genes controlling quantitative traits in an interspecific backcross of tomato. Heredity 49:11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoday JM (1961). Location of polygenes. Nature 191:368–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller J (1983) Genetic analysis of quantitative traits in Lycopersicon (tomato) by means of genetic markers, including a comparison of an improved cultivar and a wild variety (in Hebrew, English summary). PhD Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuschenko AM, Samovol AP, Korol AB, Andryushchenko AB (1979) Linkage between loci of quantitative characters and marker loci. 2. Influence of three tomato chromosomes on variability of five quantitative characters in backcross progenies. Translated from Genetika 15:672–683

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. Robertson

Contribution from The Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel, No. 767-E, 1983 Series

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soller, M., Beckmann, J.S. Genetic polymorphism in varietal identification and genetic improvement. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 67, 25–33 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303917

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303917

Key words

Navigation