Summary
The shrimp Alpheus armatus territorially defends the sea anemone it occupies, using as a weapon its large, specially modified ‘snapping’ claw. This behavior was studied in experimental contests which were symmetric (matched individuals) with respect to sex, size, and residency. Characteristics of these contests were compared for two size-classes of male and female shrimp.
There were no significant differences between these groups of shrimp in the number of bouts required to establish dominance or in the number of snaps exchanged. Large females had shorter contests than either small or large males, and losers of contests between large females were injured more frequently and more severely.
This distinctiveness of large female contests could be interpreted as evidence that (i) controlling anemones is more important for large females, (ii) injuries are less important for large females, or (iii) large females lose the ability to assess one another because their contests are less frequent.
If injuries are an accurate measure of the most important costs associated with fighting, then these results indicate that short contests are not necessarily the least costly, and that females can be more aggressive than males, as measured by escalation potential, in sexually selected species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caldwell RL, Dingle H (1975) Ecology and evolution of agonistic behavior in stomatopods. Naturwissenschaften 62:214–222
Davies NB (1978) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147
Geist V (1974) On fighting strategies in animal combat. Nature 250:354
Hazlett BA, Winn HE (1962) Sound production and associated behavior of Bermuda crustaceans (Panulirus, Gonodactylus, Alpheus, and Synalpheus). Crustaceana 4:25–38
Hyatt GW, Salmon M (1978) Combat in the fiddler crabs Uca pugilator and U. pugnax: a quantitative analysis. Behaviour 65:182–211
Knowlton N (1980) Sexual selection and dimorphism in two demes of a symbiotic, pair-bonding snapping shrimp. Evolution 34:161–173
Lorenz K (1964) Ritualized fighting. In: Carthy JD, Ebling FJ (eds) The natural history of aggression. Academic Press, London New York, pp 39–50
Maynard Smith J, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18
Nolan BA, Salmon M (1970) The behavior and ecology of snapping shrimp (Crustacea: Alpheus heterochelis and Alpheus normanni). Forma Functio 2:289–335
Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243
Parker GA, Rubenstein DI (1981) Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Anim Behav 29:221–240
Riechert SE (1979) Games spiders play. II. Resource assessment strategies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:121–128
Ritzmann RE (1974) Mechanisms for the snapping behavior of two alpheid shrimp, Alpheus californiensis and Alpheus heterochelis. J Comp Physiol 95:217–236
Schein H (1975) Aspects of the aggressive and sexual behaviour of Alpheus heterochaelis Say. Mar Behav Physiol 3:83–96
Schein H (1977) The role of snapping in Alpheus heterochaelis Say, 1818, the big-clawed snapping shrimp. Crustaceana 33:182–188
Schöne H (1968) Agonistic and sexual display in aquatic and semiterrestrial brachyuran crabs. Am Zool 8:641–654
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knowlton, N., Keller, B.D. Symmetric fights as a measure of escalation potential in a symbiotic, territorial snapping shrimp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10, 289–292 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302819
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302819