Skip to main content
Log in

Preliminary experience with a novel model assessing In vivo mechanical strength of bone grafts and substitute materials

  • Orthopedic Surgical Forum
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel canine tibia model was used to evaluate four bone graft materials: autologous cortical bone, allograft cortical bone, hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) ceramic granules, and a HA/TCP and collagen composite. Mechanical material properties were assessed using custom-designed stainless steel plugs for control of graft volume and interface surface area. These plugs held the bone graft materials in the cortex of the tibia shaft and allowed in vivo mechanical testing. After 6 months of ad lib weight bearing, the grafts were harvested and tested in torsion. The samples in each animal were compared with the test plugs into which new bone had grown without the addition of graft. Control bone peak shear strength averaged 47 (±8.3) MPa (6.78±1.2 kpsi). Compared on the basis of peak torque, stiffness, and energy to peak torque, no significant differences were found among any of the graft materials or control bone. Histologic examination revealed the materials to be osteoconductive with the extensive formation of dense, compact cancellous bone. The new bone in the autograft and allograft samples completely filled the available space, whereas gaps persisted in the synthetic ceramics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prolo DJ, Rodrigo JJ (1985) Contemporary bone graft physiology and surgery. Clin Orthop 200:322–342

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burstein AH, Frankel VH (1971) A standard test for laboratory animal bone. J Biomech 4:155–158

    Google Scholar 

  3. Russotti GM, Okada Y, Fitzgerald Jr RH, Chao EY, Gorski JP (1987) The efficacy of using calcium phosphate particles to enhance the biological fixation of a femoral component. In: Brand RA (ed) The hip. CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 120–154

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hubbard WG (1974) Physiological calcium phosphates as orthopaedic biomaterials. PhD Dissertation, Marquette University

  5. Toth JM, Hirthe WM, Hubbard WG, Brantley WA, Lynch KL (1991) Determination of the ratio of HA/TCP mixture by x-ray diffraction. J Appl Biomater 2:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  6. McPherson JM, Piez KA (1988) Collagen in dermal wound repair. In: Clark RAF, Henson PM (eds) The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. Plenum, New York, pp 471–496

    Google Scholar 

  7. Toth JB, Lynch KL, Hamson KR (1992) Osteoinductivity by calcium phosphate ceramics. 4th World Biomaterials Congress, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany, April 24–28

  8. Yamada H (1970) Strength of biological materials. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bucholz RW, Carlton A, Holmes RE (1987) Hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitutes. In: Friedlaender GE (ed) Bone grafting. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 323–334

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cornell C, Lane J, Henry S (1991) Multicenter trial of Collagraft as a bone graft substitute. J Orthop Trauma 5:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daculsi G, Passuti N, Martin S, Deudon C, Legeros RZ, Raher S (1990) Macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic for long bone surgery in humans and dogs. Clinical and histological study. J Biomed Mater Res 24:379–396

    Google Scholar 

  12. Damien CJ, Parsons JR (1991) Bone graft substitutes: a review of current technology and applications. J Appl Biomater 2:187–208

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ducheyne P (1987) Bioceramics: material characteristics versus in vivo behavior. J Biomed Mater Res: Applied Biomaterials 21:A2,219–236

    Google Scholar 

  14. Flately TJ, Lynch KL, Benson M (1983) Tissue response to implants of calcium phosphate ceramic in the rabbit spine. Clin Orthop 179:246–252

    Google Scholar 

  15. Geesink RGT, De Groot K, Klein CPAT (1987) Chemical implant fixation using hydroxylapatite coatings. The development of a human total hip prosthesis for chemical fixation to bone using hydroxyl-apatite coatings on titanium substrates. Clin Orthop 225:147–170

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gross TP, Jinnah RH, Clarke HJ, Cox QGN (1991) The biology of bone grafting. Orthopedics 14(5):563–568

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jarcho M (1981) Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin Orthop 157:259–278

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lane JM, Sandhu HS (1987) Current approaches to experimental bone grafting. In: Friedlaender GE (ed) Bone grafting. Orthopedic Clinics of North America 18:2, WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 213–235

    Google Scholar 

  19. Legeros RZ (1980) Calcium phosphate materials in restorative dentistry: a review. Adv Dent Res 2(1):164–180

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luyten FP, Cunningham NS, Ma S, Muthukumaran N, Hammonds RG, Nevins WB, Wood WI, Reddi AH (1990) Bone fide osteoinductive factors. J NIH Res 2:67–70

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lynch KL, Toth JM, Hamson KR, Ho KC, Hirthe W (1990) Osteoinductivity by subcutaneous implantation of a collagen/ceramic composite. In: Bioceramics, vol. 3. Rose Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, pp 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  22. McIntyre JP, Shackelford JF, Chapman MW, Pool RR (1991) Characterization of a bioceramic composite for repair of large bone defects. Ceramic Bull 70:9,1499–1503

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ohgushi H, Okumura M, Tamai S, Shors EC, Caplan AI (1990) Marrow cell induced osteogenesis in porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate: a comparative histomorphometric study of ectopic bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res 24:1563–1570

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamson, K.R., Toth, J.M., Stiehl, J.B. et al. Preliminary experience with a novel model assessing In vivo mechanical strength of bone grafts and substitute materials. Calcif Tissue Int 57, 64–68 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298999

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00298999

Key words

Navigation