Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the sex role orientations of male and female collegiate athletes were more similar in team sports than in individual sports. It was predicted that females in masculine-oriented team sports (basketball and volleyball) would exhibit sex role orientations more similar to those of their male counterparts than would females in individual sports (track/field and swimming). To test this notion the S. L. Bem (“The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–167) Sex Role Inventory was administered to 381 athletes from 37 National Collegiate Athletic Association institutions. The median-split procedure (S. L. Bem, “On the Utility of Alternative Procedures for Assessing Psychology Androgyny,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205) was used to classify subjects as masculine, feminine, androgynous, or undifferentiated. Separate Gender × Sex Role Orientation chi square tests were performed on the frequency data of team and individual sport athletes. The results indicated no significant differences in the sex role orientations of male and female team sport performers, with the greatest proportion (66%) having a masculine (33%) or androgynous (33%) orientation. For individual sports there was a significant difference in the sex role orientations of males and females. The highest proportion of females were classified as feminine (37%) and the lowest proportion were classified as masculine (11%). Individual sport males were somewhat evenly distributed among the four sex role orientation categories, with the highest proportion classified as undifferentiated (36%). It was concluded that sex role orientation of elite female athletes may be associated with the male appropriateness of the sport in which they participate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Social Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–167.
Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.
Berlin, P. The woman athlete. In E. W. Gerber, P. Berlin, & W. Wyrick (Eds.), The American woman in sport. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1974.
Burke, K. L. Comparison of psychological androgyny within a sample of female college athletes who participate in sports traditionally inappropriate for competition by females. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1986, 63, 779–782.
Burns, R. (1982). The self-concept. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1982.
Colker, R., & Widom, C. S. Correlates of female athletic participation: Masculinity, femininity, self-esteem, and attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 1980, 6, 47–58.
Colley, A., Roberts, N., & Chipps, A. Sex-role identity, personality, and participation in team and individual sports by males and females. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1985, 16, 103–112.
Constantinople, A. Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 389–407.
Debacy, D. L., Spaeth, R., & Busch, R. What do men really think about athletic competition for women? Journal of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, 1970, 41, 28–29.
Del Rey, P., & Sheppard, S. Relationship of psychological androgyny in female athletes to self-esteem. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1981, 12, 165–175.
Duquin, M. E. The androgynous advantage. In C. A. Oglesby (Ed.), Women and sport: From myth to reality. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1978.
Edwards, S. W., Gordin, R. D. & Henschen, K. P. Sex-role orientations of female NCAA championship gymnasts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1984, 58, 625–626.
Garman, E. W. (1969). A study of attitudes toward softball competition for women. Unpublished master's thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1969.
Harres, B. (1968). Attitudes of students toward women's athletic competition. Research Quarterly, 1968, 39, 278–284.
Harris, D. V. Female sport today: Psychological considerations. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1979, 10, 168–172.
Harris, D. V. Personality in sport participants. In L. K. Bunker, R. J. Rotella, & A. S. Reilly (Eds.), Sport psychology: Psychological considerations in maximizing sport performance. Ithaca, NY: Mouvement Publications, 1985.
Helmreich, R., & Spence, J. T. Sex roles and achievement. In D. M. Landers & R. W. Christina (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport, Vol. II. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1977.
Henschen, K. P., Edwards, S. W., & Mathinos, L. Achievement motivation and sex-role orientations of high school female track and field athletes versus nonathletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982, 55, 183–187.
Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. Athletic or antisocial? The female sport experience. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1986, 8, 198–211.
Kane, J. E. Psychological aspects of sport with special reference to the female. In D. V. Harris (Ed.), Woman and sport: A national research conference proceedings. University Park: Pennsylvania State University, College of Health, Physical Education and Recreation (Penn State HPER Series, No. 2), 1972.
King, J. P., & Chi, P. S. Social structure, sex roles, and personality: Comparisons of male/female athletes/nonathletes. In J. Goldstein (Ed.), Sports, games and play. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.
Malumphy, T. Personality of women athletes in intercollegiate competition. Research Quarterly, 1968, 39, 610–620.
Metheny, E. Connotations of movement in sport and dance. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown, 1965.
Metheny, E. Symbolic forms of movement: The feminine image in sports. In M. M. Hart (Ed.), Sport in the sociocultural process. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown, 1972.
Montemayor, R. Children's performance in a game and their attraction to it as a function of sex-typed labels. Child Development, 1974, 45, 152–156.
Myers, A. M., & Lips, H. M. Participation in competitive amateur sports as a function of psychological androgyny. Sex Roles, 1978, 4, 571–578.
Sage, G. H., & Loudermilk, S. The female athlete and role conflict. Research Quarterly, 1979, 50, 88–96.
Sherrif, M. C. The status of female athletes as viewed by selected peers and parents in certain high schools of central California. Unpublished master's thesis, Chico State College, 1969.
Singer, R. N. Personality differences between and within baseball and tennis players. Research Quarterly, 1969, 40, 582–588.
Snyder, E. E., & Kivlin, J. E. Women athletes and aspects of psychological well-being and body image. Research Quarterly, 1975, 46, 191–199.
Snyder, E. E., Kivlin, J. E., & Spreitzer, E. E. The female athlete: An analysis of objective and subjective role conflict. In A. Yiannakis, T. D. McIntyre, M. J. Melnick, & D. P. Hart (Eds.), Sport sociology: Contemporary themes. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 1979.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.
Uguccioni, S. M., & Ballantyne, R. H. Comparison of attitudes and sex roles for female athletic participants and non-participants. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1980, 11, 42–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wrisberg, C.A., Draper, M.V. & Everett, J.J. Sex role orientations of male and female collegiate athletes from selected individual and team sports. Sex Roles 19, 81–90 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292466
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292466