Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender schema theory revisited: men's stereotypes of American women

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bem's gender schema theory is reconsidered in terms of connections among schemas, stereotypes, and perceptions of self and others. The supposition that schematic, as opposed to aschematic persons, are more prone to think about others in stereotypic ways is tested. Primarily Caucasian adult men from all social classes (n=142), classified with the Bem Sex Role Inventory as masculine, androgynous, or undifferentiated, completed measures designed to assess strength of stereotypic views of American women and the tendency to think unidimensionally (the likelihood of perceiving women as feminine vs. androgynous). Results analyzed with multivariate analysis of variance, indicated significant differences among subject categories. Masculine (schematic) men were the most prone to see women as stereotypically high in femininity and low on masculinity. Androgynous men were more likely to perceive women as having androgynous characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S. M., & Bem, S. L. (1981). Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in responsiveness to physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (1990). Gender-stereotypic traits are derived from gender roles: A reply to McCreary. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, D. N., & McCormick, N. B. (1990). Sex, sex role identification, and college students' projective drawings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 460–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R. D., & DelBoca, F. K. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5, 219–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1979). Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur—Tetenbaum and Locksley—Colten critiques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1047–1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981a). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981b). Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1985). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sondregger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Psychology and Gender, 1984. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1016–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.. (1986). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. S., Larsen, M. B., Rankin, S. A., & Ballard, R. A. (1980). Sex differences in information processing. Sex Roles, 6, 663–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cann, A., & Garnett, A. K. (1984). Sex stereotype impacts on competence ratings by children. Sex Roles, 11, 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cann, A., & Haight, J. (1983). Children's perceptions of relative competence. Sex Roles, 9, 767–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cann, A., & Newbern, S. R. (1984). Sex stereotype effects in children's picture recognition. Child Development, 55, 1085–1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Kite, M. E. (1987). Thinking about gender. In B. B. Hess & M. M. Ferree (Eds.), Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1977). Sex-related patterns in the unit of perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Kite, M. E. (1987). Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 451–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 915–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, V. J., & Spence, J. T. (1987). Gender-related traits, stereotypes, and schemata. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 146–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, psychological androgyny, and the structure of values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 604–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbach, G. B., Evans, R. G., & Bodine, S. M. (1986). Gender-based schematic processing of self-descriptive information. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 372–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S., & Bem, S. L. (1985). If you are gender schematic, all members of the opposite sex look alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P. R., & Holmes, J. G. (1981). The integration of implicit personality theory schemas and stereotype images. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1985). The influence of sex-role stereotypes on prose recall. Sex Roles, 12, 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, R. O., O'Connor, M. E., Jones, W. H., & Mihelich, M. H. (1980). Role relevant sex typing and opportunity in agenetic and communal domains. Journal of Personality, 48, 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, C. (1985). Memory for the frequency of sex-typed versus neutral behaviors: Implications for the maintenance of sex stereotypes. Sex Roles, 12, 771–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1986). Gender versus category clustering in free recall: A test of gender schema theory. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 16, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahe, B. (1989). Sex-role orientation and memory for gender-related terms: Another uncertain link. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, G. D., & Carter, D. B. (1989). Gender schema, gender constancy, and gender-role knowledge: The roles of cognitive factors in preschoolers' gender-role stereotype attributions. Developmental Psychology, 25, 444–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., & Signorella, M. L. (1980). Gender-related schemata and constructive memory in children. Child Development, 51, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (1977). Androgyny, sex-typing, and the perception of masculinity-femininity in handwritings. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (1978). The naive perception of masculinity-femininity on the basis of expressive cues. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. (1983). Sex typing and the perception of body outlines. Journal of Personality, 51, 667–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Smith, J., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the social perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494–1512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, C., & Stitt, C. L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 929–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • MeCauley, C., Stitt, C. L., & Segal, M. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. J. (1983). Sex-typing and self-sehemata effects on memory and response latency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M., Evans, M., & Fulero, S. (1979). Recall for confirming events: Memory processes and the maintenance of social stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 343–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, S. (1990). Issues in feminism. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, D. O. (1987). Implications of the life-span approach for research on attitudes of social cognition. In R. P. Abeles (Ed.), Life-span perspectives and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1981). Seek and ye shall find: Testing hypotheses about other people. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identity and its implications for the concepts of masculinity and femininity. In T. B. Sondregger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Psychology and gender, 1984. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1981). Androgyny versus gender schema: A comment on Bem's gender schema theory. Psychological Review, 88, 365–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, R. A., Powell, G. E., & Chetwynd, S. J. (1979). Sex roles and sex role stereotyping. Person perception and stereotyping, 194–236.

  • Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, L., & Taylor, S. E. (1979). Sex, sex-role identification, and awareness of sex-role stereotypes. Journal of Personality, 47, 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Allegheny College, 16335, Meadville, Pennsylvania

    Mary A. Hudak

Authors
  1. Mary A. Hudak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hudak, M.A. Gender schema theory revisited: men's stereotypes of American women. Sex Roles 28, 279–293 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289886

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289886

Keywords

Search

Navigation