Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between marital satisfaction, resources, and power strategies

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine usefulness of the Falbo and Peplau model for understanding the power strategies and marital satisfaction of 42 nonstudent married couples. In addition, this study examined the impact of imbalanced resources on power strategy use and marital satisfaction. Overall, the results supported the hypothesis that people who see themselves as Equal Partners are more satisfied with their relationship than Traditional Partners. The results also indicated that Equal Partners reported using fewer strategies overall in trying to get their way. Thus, the greater use of power strategies may be associated with being in an imbalanced resource relationship, such as a traditional marriage. Furthermore, the results of this study supported the expectation that marital dissatisfaction is associated with the use of indirect strategies. Although husbands and wives overall were not found to differ in their power strategy use, there was a suggestion that traditional wives used more power strategies, regardless of type, than traditional husbands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billings, A. (1979). Conflict resolution in distressed and nondistressed married couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 368–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birchler, G. R., Weiss, R. L., & Vincent, J. P. (1975). Multimethod analysis of social reinforcement exchange between maritally distressed and nondistressed spouse and stranger dyads. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 31, 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfaction. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers, R., Raven, B. H., & Rodrigues, A. (1971). Conjugal power structure: A re-examination. American Sociological Review, 36, 264–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G., Drinkard, J., & MacGavin, L. (1984). The effects of target, age, and gender on use of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1391–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Winkle, J. (1979). You always hurt the one you love: Strategies and tactics in interpersonal conflict. Communication Quarterly, 27, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The basis of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: External investigation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1986). Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, T. L., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1986). When the honeymoon's over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In R. Gilmore & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instone, D., Major, B., & Bunker, B. B. (1983). Gender, self-confidence, and social influence strategies: An organizational simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 322–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S. (1984). The modification of cognitive processes in behavioral marital therapy: Integrating cognitive and behavioral intervention strategies. In K. Hahlweg & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 12, 383–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (1978). Women and interpersonal power. In I. H. Frieze, J. E. Parsons, P B. Johnson, D. N. Ruble, & G. L. Zellman (Eds.), Women and sex roles. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D. (1984) The use of power in organizations and in interpersonal settings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 5). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Research based theories. (Vol. 1) New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. W. (1980). Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970–1979. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 841–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navran, L. (1967). Communication and adjustment in marriage. Family Process, 6, 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & Ryder, R. G. (1970). Inventory of marital conflicts (INC): An experimental interaction procedure. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ort, R. S. (1950). A study of role-conflicts as related to happiness in marriage. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 691–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., & Hops, H. (1972). Coercion, a game for two: Intervention techniques for marital conflict. In R. E. Urich & P. Mounjoy (Eds.), The experimental analysis of social behavior. New York: Appleton-Centure-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., & Reid, J. B. (1970). Reciprocity and coercion: Two facets of social systems. In J. L. Michael & C. Neuringer (Eds.), Behavior modification in clinical psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikes, G. R., & Sillars, A. L. (1985). Reprocity of marital communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 303–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raush, H. L., Barry, W. A., Hertel, R. K., & Swain, M. A. (1974). Communication, conflict, and marriage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, B. H., Centers, R., & Rodrigues, A. (1975). The bases of conjugal power. In R. E. Cromwell & D. H. Olson (Eds.), Power in families. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1970). The study of family power structure: A review, 1960–1969. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawin, L. L. (1985). Dating violence: A prospectus draft. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.

  • Scanzoni, J. (1979). Social processes and power in families. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family: Research-based theories (Vol. 1). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, C. (1984). A comparison of the interaction of distressed and nondistressed married couples in a laboratory situation: Literature survey, methodological issues, and an empirical investigation. In K. Hallweg & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szinocacz, M. E. (1981). Relationship among marital power measures: A critical review and an empirical test. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 12, 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. L., Hops, H., & Patterson, G. R. (1973). A framework for conceptualizing marital conflict, technology for altering it, some data for evaluating it. In L. A. Hamerlynck, L. C. Hondy, & E. J. Marsh (Eds.), Behavior Change: Methodology, Concept, and Practice (pp. 309–342). Campaign, IL: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was based upon the first author's doctoral dissertation at the University of Texas at Austin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aida, Y., Falbo, T. Relationships between marital satisfaction, resources, and power strategies. Sex Roles 24, 43–56 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288702

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288702

Keywords

Navigation