Skip to main content
Log in

Response styles to sadness are related to sex and sex-role orientation

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nolen-Hoeksema's (1987) response style theory states that women ruminate on sadness more than men, and that men distract themselves from sadness more than women. These response styles are assumed to develop through the socialization of sex-appropriate behavior. The present study extended this argument by examining the relation of sex-role orientation to response styles in an adult sample. It was hypothesized that greater femininity is associated with more rumination and less distraction in response to sadness, and that greater masculinity is associated with less rumination and more distraction in response to sadness. Male and female undergraduates completed the short form of the BSRI and a coping measure. Consistent with expectations, subjects' sex-role scores were significant predictors of coping responses. Higher femininity was associated with more rumination, whereas higher masculinity was associated with more distraction. As in previous research, sex differences emerged. Female subjects relative to male subjects reported more rumination and less distraction in response to sadness. The sex-role findings are discussed in relation to current conceptualizations of femininity and masculinity measures, and in relation to sex-role differences in depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, A. G., & Moos, R. H. (1981). The role of coping responses and social resources in attentuating the stress of life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. H., & Weissman, M. M. (1981). Epidemiology of affective disorders: A re-examination and future directions. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 1039–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chino, A. F., & Funabiki, D. (1984). A cross-validation of sex differences in the expression of depression. Sex Roles, 11, 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elpern, S., & Karp, S. A. (1984). Sex role orientation and depressive symptomatology. Sex Roles, 10, 987–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funabiki, D., Bologna, N. C., Pepping, M., & Fitzgerald, K. C. (1980). Revisiting sex differences in the expression of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 194–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., & Taylor, M. C. (1985). Psychological androgeny and the Masculinity × Femininity interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 429–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammen, C. L., & Padesky, C. A. (1977). Sex differences in the expression of depressive responses on the Beck Depression Inventory. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 609–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinke, C. L., Staneski, R. A., & Mason, J. K. (1982). Sex differences in coping with depression. Sex Roles, 8, 877–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (1987). Psychological distress, problem solving, and coping reactions: Sex role differences. Sex Roles, 16, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1987). Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 259–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padesky, C. A., & Hammen, C. L. (1981). Sex differences in depressive symptom expression and help-seeking among college students. Sex Roles, 7, 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G., & Brown, L. B. (1979). Repertoires of response to potential precipitants of depression. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 13, 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.). Progress in experimental personality research, (Vol. 13, pp. 1–97). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoppard, J. M., & Paisley, K. J. (1987). Masculinity, femininity, life stress, and depression. Sex Roles, 16, 489–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, E. G., Sullivan-Guest, S., & McGuire, J. (1984). Feminine sex role and depression in middle aged women. Sex Roles, 11, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, M. M., & Klerman, G. L. (1977). Sex differences in the epidemiology of depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 34, 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1984). Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 12, 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillman, D., Weaver, J. B., Mundorf, N., & Aust, C. F. (1986). Effects of an opposite-gender companion's affect to horror on distress, delight, and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 586–594.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was conducted by Constantina Giannopoulos in partial fulfillment of a Master of Arts degree of Concordia University, under the supervision of Michael Conway. This research was presented at the Eastern Psychological Association convention, Philadelphia, PA, 1990. This research was supported by research grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRCC) and the Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide á la Recherche (FCAR) of Quebec awarded to Michael Conway, and was conducted while Constantina Giannopoulos held an FCAR fellowship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conway, M., Giannopoulos, C. & Stiefenhofer, K. Response styles to sadness are related to sex and sex-role orientation. Sex Roles 22, 579–587 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288236

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288236

Keywords

Navigation