Skip to main content
Log in

The scientific error of sexist research: A case study

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Examination of a recent article on sex differences in response to being touched (Whitcher & Fisher, 1979) illustrates that current preoccupation with using nonsexist referents in APA journals does not necessarily produce meaningful modification where it matters most — in the conceptual analysis of the psychological process under investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • APA Publication Manual Task Force. Guidelines for nonsexist language in APA journals. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 487–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. S. Nonverbal communication between patients and medical practitioners. Journal of Social Issues, 1979, 35, 82–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. Body politics: Power, sex and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcher, S. J., & Fisher, J. D. Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, H.S. The scientific error of sexist research: A case study. Sex Roles 6, 747–750 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287494

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287494

Keywords

Navigation