Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Diabetologia
  3. Article

Current perception thresholds: a new, quick, and reproducible method for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus

  • Originals
  • Published: October 1989
  • Volume 32, pages 724–728, (1989)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Diabetologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Current perception thresholds: a new, quick, and reproducible method for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus
Download PDF
  • E. A. Masson1,
  • A. Veves1,
  • D. Fernando1 &
  • …
  • A. J. M. Boulton1 
  • 988 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Summary

The Neurometer is a variable constant current sine wave stimulator, and has recently been proposed as a simple non-invasive and quantitative measure of peripheral nerve function. The device is portable and battery operated; assessment of upper and lower extremities takes only a few min, in contrast to conventional assessment techniques. In order to assess its potential in the quantification of diabetic neuropathy, detection thresholds for constant current electric sine wave stimulation were measured at three different frequencies in different sites in 31 healthy control subjects and 90 diabetic patients with and without neuropathy. The device provides good discrimination between neuropathic and non-neuropathic groups (p<0.001) and is quick and easy to use. Comparisons with results of conventional tests of nerve function show that high frequency detection thresholds correlate best with tests of large fibre function (r= 0.42–0.69, p<0.001), and low frequency detection thresholds correlate with tests of small fibre function (r=0.34–0.46, p<0.005). It is concluded that the device may be a simple and comprehensive way of assessing peripheral nerve function.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Assessment of Nerve Fibers Dysfunction Through Current Perception Threshold Measurement in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Chapter © 2017

Psychophysics: Quantitative Sensory Testing in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Small Fiber Neuropathy

Chapter © 2019

A portable, programmable, multichannel stimulator with high compliance voltage for noninvasive neural stimulation of motor and sensory nerves in humans

Article Open access 01 March 2023
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. Brown MJ, Asbury AK (1984) Diabetic neuropathy. Ann Neurol 15: 2–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Birke JA, Sims DS (1986) Plantar sensory threshold in the ulcerative foot. Lepr Rev 57: 261–267

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jamal GA, Hansen S, Weir AI, Ballantyne JP (1985) An improved automated method for the measurement of thermal thresholds. 1.normal subjects. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48: 354–360

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertlesmann FW, Heimans JJ, Weber EJM, Van der Veen EA, Schouten JA (1985) Thermal discrimination thresholds in normal subjects and in patients with diabetic neuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 48: 686–690

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fowler CJ, Carroll MB, Burns D, Howe N, Robinson K (1987) A portable system for measuring cutaneous thresholds for warming and cooling. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50: 1211–1215

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guy RJC, Clark CA, Malcolm PN, Watkin PJ (1985) Evaluation of thermal and vibration sensation in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia 28: 131–137

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boulton AJM, Hardisty CA, Betts RP, Franks CI, Worth RC, Ward JD, Duckworth T (1983) Dynamic foot pressure and other studies as diagnostic and management aids in diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 6: 26–33

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dyck PJ, Karnes J, O'Brien PC, Zimmerman IR (1984) Detection thresholds of cutaneous sensation in humans. (In) Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Lambert EH, Bunge R (eds) Peripheral neuropathy. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1103–1138

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams G, Gill JS, Aber V, Mather HM (1988) Variability in vibration threshold among sites: a potential source of error in biothesiometry. Br Med J 296: 233–235

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dyck PJ (1988) Detection, characterisation, and staging of polyneuropathy: assessed in diabetics. Muscle and Nerve 11: 21–32

    Google Scholar 

  11. Consensus statement (1988) Report and recommendations of the San Antonio conference on diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 37: 1000–1004

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boulton AJM, Knight G, Drury J, Ward JD (1985) The prevalence of symptomatic, diabetic neuropathy in an insulin-treated population. Diabetes Care 8: 125–128

    Google Scholar 

  13. Katims JJ, Naviasky EH, Rendell MS, Ng LKY, Bleeker ML (1987) Constant current since wave transcutaneous nerve stimulation for the evaluation of peripheral neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68: 210–213

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boulton AJM, Ward JD (1986) Diabetic neuropathies and pain. Clin Endocrinol Metab 15 (4): 917–931

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ganong WF (1981) Review of medical phyisology, 10th edn. Lange, Los Altos, pp 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brazier MAB (1968) The electrical activity of the nervous system, 3rd edn. Pitman Medical, London, pp 79–91

    Google Scholar 

  17. Torebjork HE, Hallin RG (1974) Responses in human A and C fibres to repeated electrical intradermal stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 37: 653–664

    Google Scholar 

  18. Talbot WH, Darian Smith I, Kornhuber HH, Mountcastle VB (1968) The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. J Neurophysiol 31: 301–334

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vallbo AB, Hagbarth K-E, Torebjork HE, Wallin BG (1979) Somatosensory, Proprioceptive and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. Physiol Rev 59 (4): 919–957

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK

    E. A. Masson, A. Veves, D. Fernando & A. J. M. Boulton

Authors
  1. E. A. Masson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Veves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Fernando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. J. M. Boulton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Masson, E.A., Veves, A., Fernando, D. et al. Current perception thresholds: a new, quick, and reproducible method for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 32, 724–728 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274531

Download citation

  • Received: 06 March 1989

  • Revised: 05 June 1989

  • Issue Date: October 1989

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00274531

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Key words

  • Neurometer
  • diabetic neuropathy
  • vibration perception
  • nerve conduction
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

18.216.16.236

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature