Skip to main content
Log in

The take of bone, cartilage and dermis within a capsule preformed by a silastic implant

  • Published:
Chirurgia plastica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In 15 rats, silastic implants were replaced by bone, cartilage, and dermal grafts after 6 to 8 weeks. At the same time, part of these grafts were also implanted outside the sheaths. The grafts were examined 6 to 9 months later. Within the silastic induced sheaths, only the vitality of the dermal grafts was impaired to any degree. Bone and cartilage took as well inside the induced sheaths as in a normal wound-bed. Since there were only thin membranes of the normal reaction type I observed in all animals, after 6 to 8 weeks, no conclusion can be drawn concerning the behaviour of the grafts within a thicker, more severe reaction type sheath.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergljung, L.: Vascular reactions after tendon suture and tendon transplantation. Scand. J. plast. reconstr. Surg., Suppl. 4 (1969)

  2. Buck-Gramcko, D.: Probleme bei der Behandlung der Beugesehnenverletzungen der Hand. Chir. Praxis 11, 577 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conway, H., Smith, J.W., Elliott, M.P.: Studies on the revascularisation of tendons grafted by the silicone rod technique. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 46, 582 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cronin, T.D., Gerow, F.J.: Augmentation mammaplasty: A new feel prosthesis. Transactions of the Third Int. Congr. of Plastic Surg., Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica 41 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geldmacher, J.: Die zweizeitige freie Beugesehnentransplantation. Handchirurgie 3, 109 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hunter, J.M., Salisbury, R.E.: Use of gliding artificial implants to produce tendon sheaths. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 45, 564 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laub, D.R., Spohn, W., Lash, H., Weber, J., Chase, R.A.: Accurate reconstruction of traumatic bony contour defects of periorbital area with prefabricated Silastic. J. Trauma 10, 472 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lipshütz, H.: A clinical evaluation of subdermal and subcutaneous silicone implants. Plast. reconstr. Surg. 37, 249 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skoog, T., Ohlsen, L., Sohn, S.A.: The chondrogenic potential of the perichondrium. Chir. plastica (Berl.) 3, 91 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilflingseder, P., Propst, A., Mikuz, G.: Constrictive fibrosis following silicone implants in mammary augmentation. Chir. plastica (Berl.) 2, 215 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilflingseder, P., Propst, A., Mikuz, G., Hoinkes, G.: Constrictive fibrosis post augmentation mammaplasty. Transactions of the Sixth Int. Congr. of Plast. and Reconstr. Surg., Paris 1975. Paris-New York-Barcelone-Milan: Masson 1976

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilflingseder, P., Bauer, M., Miller, B.: The use of plastics in the primary repair of facial injuries. Minerva Chirurgia (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderl, H., Bauer, M. & Mikuz, G. The take of bone, cartilage and dermis within a capsule preformed by a silastic implant. Chir Plastica 4, 73–79 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263289

Key words

Navigation