Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of choosing between using and avoiding equality predicates

  • Basic Research Problem
  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is the twentieth of a series of articles discussing various open research problems in automated reasoning. The problem proposed for research asks one to find criteria for effectively choosing between using and avoiding equality predicates. Since there exist inference rules (such as paramodulation) that enable an automated reasoning program to treat equality as ‘understood’, the discovery of such criteria would mark an important advance for the field. For evaluating a proposed solution to this research problem, we suggest possible test problems from group theory, ring theory, and Boolean algebra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guard, J., Oglesby, F., Bennett, J., and Settle, L., ‘Semi-automated mathematics’, Journal ACM 16, 49–62 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lusk, E., and Overbeek, R., The Automated Reasoning System ITP, Technical Report ANL-84-27, Argonne National Laboratory (April 1984).

  3. McCune, W., OTTER 2.0 Users Guide, Technical Report ANL-90/9, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McCune, W., What's New in OTTER 2.2. Mathematics and Computer Science Division Technical Report ANL/MCS-TM-153, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson, G., and Wos, L., ‘Paramodulation and theorem-proving in first-order theories with equality’, in B. Meltzer and D. Michie (eds), Machine Inntelligence 4, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1969), pp. 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson, J., ‘Automatic deduction with hyper-resolution’, International J. Computer Mathematics 1, 227–234 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wos, L., Automated Reasoning: 33 Basic Research Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wos, L., ‘The problem of choosing between predicate and function notation for problem representation’, J. Automated Reasoning 6, 463–464 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wos, L., Overbeek, R., Lusk, E., and Boyle, J., Automated Reasoning: Introduction and Applications, 2nd edn., McGraw-Hill, New York (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wos, L., and Robinson, G., ‘Maximal models and refutation completeness: Semidecision procedures in automatic theorem proving’, W. Boone, F. Cannonito, and R. Lyndon (eds), Word Problems: Decision Problems and the Burnside Problem in Group Theory, North-Holland, New York (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by the Applied Mathematical Sciences subprogram of the Office of Energy Research, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wos, L. The problem of choosing between using and avoiding equality predicates. J Autom Reasoning 8, 307–309 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00244286

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00244286

Key words

Navigation