Summary
The response of single cells in the striate cortex of cat to a moving light bar of variable orientation was measured by a method providing data on the mean response as well as the standard deviation (SD) at the different stimulus orientations.
At the optimal stimulus orientation the SD was about 1/3 of the mean response. Marked differences in this respect were found between simple and complex cells, i.e., the SD for the simple cells was about 1/2 of the mean response and about 1/4 for the complex cells.
The variation coefficient (Vc = SD/mean) was minimal at the optimal orientation and increased relatively in the same manner for simple and complex cells as the stimulus orientation was varied away from optimal orientation. The Vc varied with the mean response at optimal orientation in a nonlinear manner. A function is proposed which fits this relationship and which is equally applicable for both simple and complex cells.
The mean orientation discrimination (MOD) was defined as that change in orientation angle away from the optimal which produced a response statistically different — on the 1 % level — from the response to the optimal orientation. There were differences in MOD between the two sides of the orientation tuning curve: the mean of the smaller of the two values was 13.5 deg and of the larger 19.7 deg. No significant difference in MOD was found between simple and complex cells despite the fact that the halfwidth of the tuning curves for the two cell types was 19.5 deg and 31.6 deg, respectively.
The preciseness in localization of the most sensitive part within the receptive field of single cells was calculated from the variability in time of occurrence of the smallest interspike interval. The degree of preciseness was found to be of the order of 1/4 of the receptive field diameter in both simple and complex cells. When nonoptimal stimulus orientations were presented, the preciseness significantly decreased in complex cells whereas it remained unchanged in simple cells.
It is suggested that the same type of intracortical wiring produces orientation selectivity in simple and complex cells, and that the differences in tuning width are mainly due to a larger extension of inhibitory fields in the simple cells. Considering the cortical visual cells as elementary units in a network built for orientation detection and discrimination, the tuning width seems of minor importance for that function.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albus, K.: A quantitative study of the projection area of the central and paracentral visual field in area 17 of the cat. II. The spatial organization of the orientation domain. Exp. Brain Res. 24, 181–202 (1975)
Andrews, D.P.: Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. Nature (Lond.) 205, 1218–1220 (1965)
Andrews, D.P.: Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. Part I: Short lines. Vision Res. 7, 975–997 (1967)
Blakemore, C., Campbell, F.W.: On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 203, 237–260 (1969)
Bisti, S., Maffei, L.: Behavioral contrast sensitivity of the cat in various visual meridians. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 241, 201–210 (1974)
Campbell, F.W., Kulikowski, J.J.: Orientation selectivity of the human visual system. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 187, 437–445 (1966)
Campbell, F.W., Cleland, B.G., Cooper, G.F., Enroth-Cugell, C.: The angular selectivity of visual cortical cells to moving gratings. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 198, 237–250 (1968)
Campbell, F.W., Gilinsky, A.A., Howell, E.R., Riggs, L.A., Atkinson, J.: The dependence of monocular rivalry on orientation. Perception 2, 123–125 (1973)
Campbell, F.W., Maffei, L.: Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 207, 635–652 (1970)
Creutzfeldt, O.D., Innocenti, G.M., Brooks, D.: Vertical organization in the visual cortex (Area 17) in the cat. Exp. Brain Res. 21, 315–336 (1974a)
Creutzfeldt, O.D., Kuhnt, U., Benevento, L.A.: An intracellular analysis of visual cortical neurones to moving stimuli: Reponses in a co-operative neuronal network. Exp. Brain Res. 21, 251–274 (1974b)
Fernald, R., Chase, R.: An improved method for plotting retinal landmarks and focusing the eyes. Vision Res. 11, 95–96 (1971)
Gilinsky, A.A.: Orientation-specific effects of patterns of adapting light on visual acuity. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 58, 13–18 (1968)
Hammond, P., Andrews, D.P., James, C.R.: Invariance of orientational and directional tuning in visual cortical cells of the adult cat. Brain Res. 96, 56–59 (1975)
Heggelund, P., Albus, K.: Orientation selectivity of single cells in striate cortex of cat: The shape of orientation tuning curves. Vision Res. (In press)
Henry, G.H., Bishop, P.O., Tupper, R.M., Dreher, B.: Orientation specificity and response variability of cells in the striate cortex. Vision Res. 13, 1771–1779 (1973)
Henry, G.H., Dreher, B., Bishop, P.O.: Orientation specificity of cells in cat striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 37, 1394–1409 (1974)
Hubel, D.H.: The visual cortex of the brain. Sci. Amer. 209, 54–62 (1963)
Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 148, 574–591 (1959)
Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 160, 106–154 (1962)
Hubel, D.H., Wiesel, T.N.: Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 229–289 (1965)
Lee, B.B., Albus, K., Heggelund, P., Hulme, M.J., Creutzfeldt, O.D.: The depth distribution of optimal stimulus orientations for neurones in cat Area 17. Exp. Brain Res. 27, 301–314 (1977)
McCollough, C.: Color adaptation of edge-detectors in the human visual system. Science (N.Y.) 149, 1115–1116 (1965)
Pettigrew, J.D., Nikara, T., Bishop, P.O.: Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 6, 373–390 (1968)
Pfanzagl, J.: Allgemeine Methodenlehre der Statistik. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 1968
Rose, D., Blakemore, C.: An analysis of orientation selectivity in the cat's visual cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 20, 1–17 (1974)
Schiller, P.H., Finlay, B.L., Volman, S.F.: Short term response variability of monkey striate neurons. Brain Res. 105, 347–349 (1976)
Stone, J., Freeman, R.B.: Neurophysiological mechanisms in the visual discrimination of form. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology (ed. R. Jung), Vol. VII/3A, pp. 153–207. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Spinger: 1973
Tomko, G.J., Crapper, D.R.: Neuronal variability: non-stationary responses to identical visual stimuli. Brain Res. 79, 405–418 (1974)
Werner, G., Mountcastle, V.B.: The variability of central neural activity in sensory system, and its implications for the central reflection of sensory events. J. Neurophysiol. 26, 958–977 (1963)
Whitsel, B.L., Schreiner, R.C., Essick, G.K.: An analysis of variability in somatosensory cortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 40, 589–607 (1977)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heggelund, P., Albus, K. Response variability and orientation discrimination of single cells in striate cortex of cat. Exp Brain Res 32, 197–211 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239727
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239727