Skip to main content
Log in

Fertile, intermediate hybrids between Phaseolus vulgaris and P. acutifolius from congruity backcrossing

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Sexual Plant Reproduction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Recurrent or introgressive backcrossing of Phaseolus vulgaris — P. acutifolius hybrids with either P. vulgaris or P. acutifolius increased fertility, as measured by pollen stainability and seed per pod from non-manipulated flowers, while invariably resulting in loss of traits from the non-recurrent parent. When hybrids were backcrossed with each of the parent species in alternate generations (congruity backcrossing), fertility decreased in early generations but gradually increased in later generations. By the fourth or fifth generation, congruity-backcross hybrids produced numbers of seeds per pod from non-manipulated flowers comparable to those of parent species, although the percent of stainable pollen tended to be lower. Congruity-backcross hybrids were intermediate to parent species when pedigrees contained equal representation of parents but favored the majority parent when pedigrees were unbalanced. Individuals exhibiting symptoms of developmental incongruity, such as abnormal leaflet number, foliar variagation, or unusual growth patterns, occurred in each generation. However, completely new characteristics appeared after the second backcross generation, presumably due to recombination. Backcrossing to both parent species in alternate generation reversed incongruity, allowing selection for fertility without loss of traits from one of the parent species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard RW (1960) Principles of plant breeding. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E (1949) Introgressive hybridization. Hafner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen E (1954) Introgression in Adenostoma. Ann Miss Bot Gard 41:339–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Buishand TJ (1956) The crossing of bean (Phaseolus spp.). Euphytica 5:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton E (1950) Sterile tobacco. J Hered 41:171–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley JW (1982) Theory for transfer of alleles. Crop Sci 22:631–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk W (1985) Phytotron experiments Pisum. I. Influence of temperature on the flowering behaviour of different genotypes. Theor Appl Genet 70:207–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi K (1986) Methods of hybridization of two bean species: Phaseolus vulgaris and P. acutifolius. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi K, Ascher PD (1988) Interspecific hybridization of Phaseolus vulgaris with cultivated and wild accessions of P. acutifolius. 3 Am Soc Hortic Sci (in press)

  • Hanson WD (1959) The breakup of initial linkage blocks under selected mating systems. Genetics 44:857–868

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan JR (1966) Plant introduction and biosystematics. In: Frey KJ (ed) Plant breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 55–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom NG (1973) A model for incongruity in intimate partner relationships. Euphytica 22:219–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom NG (1975) Incompatibility and incongruity: two different mechanisms for the non-functioning of intimate partner relationships. Proc R Soc London Ser B 188:361–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogenboom NG (1984) Incongruity: non-functioning of intercellular and intracellular partner relationships through nonmatching information. In: Lins-kens HF, Heslop-Harrison J (eds) Cellular interactions. (Encyclopedia of plant physiology, NS, vol 17) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 641–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht H (1948) Zur Lösung des Artproblems: neue und bisher bekannte Ergebnisse der Kreuzung Phaseolus vulgaris × P. coccineus and reziprok. Agri Hort Genet 6:83–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang W (1971) Crosses between Hordeum vulgare L. and H. bulbosum L. II. Elimination of chromosomes in hybrid tissues. Euphytica 20:181–197

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintrock B (1984) The significance of responses to challenge. Science 226:792–801

    Google Scholar 

  • McFerson JR (1984) Genetic and breeding studies of dinitrogen fixation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L).. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanna MS, Hille J, Zabel P (1985) Chromosome breakage-fusion-bridge cycles and phenotypic instability in isochromosome lines of tomato. Theor Appl Genet 71:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhyne CL (1958) Linkage studies in Gossypium. Altered recombinations in allotetraploid G. hirsutum L. following linkage group transference from related species. Genetics 43:822–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley HP (1938) A character analysis of colonies of Iris fulva: I. hexagona var. ‘giganticaerulea’ and natural hybrids. Am J Bot 25:727–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand S, Christoff G (1973) Cytoplasmic-chromosomal interactions and altered differentiation in tobacco. J Hered 64:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabelrauch R, Kloc-Bauchan, Sink KC (1985) Expression of nuclear-cytoplasm genomic incompatibility in interspecific Petunia somatic hybrid plants. Theor Appl Genet 70:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt J (1970) Interspecific hybridization between cultivated American species of the genus Phaseolus. Euphytica 19:480–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1974) Evolution of morphogenic patterns. Brookhaven Symp Biol 25:27–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1977) Processes in organic evolution. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SG (1961) Species differentiation in relation to crop improvement. Crop Sci 1:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe W, Herrmann RG (1982) Selection and maintenance of plastome mutants and interspecific genome/plastome hybrids from Oenothera. In: Edelmann M, Hallick RB, Chua N-H (eds) Methods in chloroplast molecular biology. Elsevier Biomedical Press, New York Amsterdam, pp 149–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan JG, Bliss FD (1983) Genetic control of quantitative variation in phaseolin seed protein of common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 108:782–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurling N (1982) The utilization of backcrossing in improving the seed yield of spring rape (Brassica napus L.). Z Pflanzenzücht 8:43–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall JR (1970) Experimental introgression in the genus Phaseolus. I. Effect of mating systems on interspecific gene flow. Evolution 24:356–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuluaga S (1985) Rhizobium affinities and root peroxidase patterns of some Phaseolus species. PhD thesis, University of Minnisota, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Scientific Journal Series Paper Number 15, 671 of the Minnesota Agricultural Experimental Station

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haghighi, K.R., Ascher, P.D. Fertile, intermediate hybrids between Phaseolus vulgaris and P. acutifolius from congruity backcrossing. Sexual Plant Reprod 1, 51–58 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227023

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00227023

Key words

Navigation