Abstract
This essay constructs a very general model of an election campaign contributor's decision problem. This model permits one to assess the effects of three variables on the campaign contribution decision in two-candidate elections. These variables are: first, the level of the statutory contribution limit; second, the presence of a statute enforcing disclosure of the source and amount of each contribution; and third, the contributor's subjectively estimated probability that each of the two candidates wins. The findings from the model lead to the conclusions that statutory limits and disclosure work against the candidate whom the contributor believes to be trailing. Moreover, as the statutory contribution limit becomes smaller, the leading candidate's perceived electoral margin needed to receive all of the contributor's budget diminishes to zero. Hence, the Supreme Court majority's decision in Buckley v. Valeo, that the 1974 Federal Election Campaign Act does not discriminate invidiously against challengers of incumbents, as well as minor party candidates, is brought into serious question.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, Burton A., and Settle, Russell F. ‘A modest proposal for election reform,’ Public Choice 28 (1976), pp. 37–53.
Adamany, David. Financing Politics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969.
Adamany, David. Campaign Finance in America. Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury, 1972.
Adamany, David. ‘The sources of political money,’ The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (hereafter Annals) 425 (1976), pp. 17–32.
Adamany, David. ‘Money, politics, and democracy: a review essay,’ The American Political Science Review 71 (1977), pp. 289–304.
Adamany, David, and Agree, George. Political Money: A Strategy for Campaign Financing in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975a.
Adamany, David, and Agree, George. ‘Election campaign financing: the 1974 reforms,’ Political Science Quarterly 90 (1975b), pp. 201–220.
Alexander, Herbert E. Financing the 1968 Election. Lexington, Mass.: Heath Lexington, 1971.
Alexander, Herbert E. Money in Politics. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press, 1972.
Alexander, Herbert E. Financing the 1972 Election. Lexington, Mass.: Heath Lexington, 1976.
Aranson, Peter H., and Ordeshook, Peter C. ‘A prolegomenon to a theory of the failure of representative democracy,’ in R. Auster and B. Sears, eds., American Re-evolution: Papers and Proceedings. Tucson: University of Arizona, 1977.
Ben-Zion, Uri, and Eytan, Zeev. ‘On money, votes, and policy in a democratic society,’ Public Choice 17 (1974), pp. 1–10.
Dawson, Paul A., and Zinser, James E. ‘Political finance and participation in congressional elections,’ Annals 425 (1976), pp. 59–73.
Dunn, Delmer D. Financing Presidential Campaigns. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1972.
Epstein, Edwin M. ‘Corporations and labor unions in electoral politics,’ Annals 425 (1976), pp. 33–58.
Ferejohn, John, and Noll, Roger. ‘A dissenting voice on campaign reform,’ Social science working paper, California Institute of Technology, 1973.
Fleishman, Joel L., and Greenwald, Carol S. ‘Public interest litigation and political finance reform,’ Annals 425 (1976), pp. 114–132.
Hacker, Andrew. ‘Pressure politics in Pennsylvania: The Truckers vs. the Railroads,’ in Alan F. Westin, ed., The Uses of Power: 7 Cases in American Politics. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1962.
Heard, Alexander. The Costs of Democracy. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1960.
Heard, Alexander. ‘Establishing public confidence in the electoral process,’ Annals 425 (1976), pp. 143–150.
Hinich, Melvin J. ‘A model for campaign contributions,’ in R. Auster and B. Sears, eds., American Re-evolution: Papers and Proceedings. Tucson: University of Arizona, 1977.
Kazman, Sam. ‘The economics of the 1974 Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments,’ Buffalo Law Review 25 (1976), pp. 519–543.
Keefe, William J., and Ogul, Morris S. The American Legislative Process: Congress and the States, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975.
Minnow, Newton M., and Mitchell, Lee M. ‘Incumbent television: a case of indecent exposure,’ Annals 425 (1976), pp. 74–87.
Mueller, Dennis C., Tollison, Robert, and Willett, Thomas D. ‘Representative democracy via random selection,’ Public Choice 12 (1972), pp. 57–68.
Nicholson, Marlene A. ‘Campaign financing and equal protection,’ Stanford Law Review 26 (1974), pp. 815–854.
Patterson, Thomas E., and McClure, Robert D. ‘Television and the less-interested voter: the costs of an informed electorate,’ Annals 425 (1976), pp. 88–97.
Penniman, Howard R., and Winter, Ralph K., Jr. Campaign Finances: Two Views of the Political and Constitutional Implications. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1971.
Pittman, Russell. ‘The effects of industry concentration and regulation on contributions in three 1972 U.S. Senate campaigns,’ Public Choice 27 (1976), pp. 71–80.
Pittman, Russell. ‘Market structure and campaign contributions,’ Public Choice 31 (1977), pp. 37–52.
Plattner, Marc F. ‘Campaign financing: the dilemma of reform,’ The Public Interest 27 (1974), pp. 112–130.
Redish, Martin H. ‘Campaign spending laws and the First Amendment,’ New York University Law Review 46 (1971), pp. 907–924.
Rosenthal, Albert J. Federal Regulation of Campaign Finance: Some Constitutional Questions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972.
Simon, Paul. ‘The Illinois legislature: a study in corruption,’ Harper's Magazine (September 1964), pp. 74–78.
Staaf, Robert J. ‘Homo politicus and homo economicus: advertising and information,’ in David G. Tuerck, ed., The Political Economy of Advertising. Washington, D.C.: The American Enterprise Institute, 1978.
Staats, Elmer B. ‘Impact of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971,’ Annals 425 (1976), pp. 98–113.
Tullock, Gordon. ‘The purchase of politicians,’ Western Economic Journal 10 (1972), pp. 354–355.
United States House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary, 93rd Cong., 2nd Session. ‘Nomination of Nelson A. Rockefeller to be Vice President of the United States,’ Hearings, 1974.
United States Senate, Committee on Rules and Administration, 93rd Cong., 2nd Session. ‘Nomination of Nelson A. Rockefeller of New York to be Vice President of the United States,’ Hearings, 1974.
Welch, William P. ‘The economics of campaign funds,’ Public Choice 20 (1974), pp. 83–97.
Additional information
Respectively, Law and Economics Center, University of Miami School of Law, and Department of Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. An earlier version of this paper was prepared for delivery at the 1977 Annual Meeting of the Southern Economic Association, November 2–4, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aranson, P.H., Hinich, M.J. Some aspects of the political economy of election campaign contribution laws. Public Choice 34, 435–461 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225679
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225679