Skip to main content
Log in

Why insects swarm: testing the models for lek mating systems on swarming Empis borealis females

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

Female dance-flies, Empis borealis L., gather to swarm, and males carrying nuptial gifts visit swarms for mating. Field observations and experiments were performed on this behaviorally sex-role reversed species to test models of lekking behavior. The key predictions were: (1) female preference model: male visiting rate and mating rate should increase with the number of females in swarm (swarm size), (2) hotspot model: male visiting rate should be independent of swarm size, and (3) hotshot model: swarm size should be positively correlated with the body size of the largest female in swarm. We found that male visiting rate and mating rate increased with swarm size, and that mating rate per female increased with swarm size. Males also mated more often in larger swarms than in smaller ones. Both males and females visited swarm sites even in the absence of other individuals. When females were successively removed from swarm sites more males than females on average arrived at these sites: 2.25 males per female. When no individuals were present at the swarm site, arriving males moved on to another site, whereas arriving females generally stayed. Larger experimental swarm-markers attracted both more males and more females and even more males when swarming females were present. There was no correlation between mean or median female size in swarms and the number of females in swarms. Thus, the female preference model and the hotspot model were corroborated, while other models were judged unlikely to explain swarming behavior in E. borealis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo RV, Höglund J, Lundberg A, Sutherland WJ (1992) Evolution of black grouse leks: female preferences benefit males in larger leks. Behav Ecol 3:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1987) Leks and hilltopping in insects. J Nat Hist 21:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD (1975) Natural selection and specialized chorusing behavior in acoustical insects. In: Pimental D (ed) Insects, science, and society. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD, Flecker AS (1989) The mating biology of a mass-swarming mayfly. Anim Behav 37:361–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Arak A (1988) Callers and satellites in the natterjack toad: evolutionary stable desision rules. Anim. Behav 36:416–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery MI (1984) Lekking in birds: choice, competition and reproductive constraints. Ibis 126:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson P (1983) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambrdidge

    Google Scholar 

  • Beehler BM, Foster MS (1988) Hotshots, hotspots, and female prefrence in the organization of lek mating systems. Am Nat 131:203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1977) Lek mating in the hammerheaded bat. Z Tierpsychol, 45:225–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1981) The evolution of leks. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior, recent research and new theory. Chiron Press, New York, pp 138–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1985) Contrasts between insects and vertebrates in the evolution of male display, female choice, and lek mating. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York, pp 286–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Davies NB (1987) Relative role of intra- and intersexual selection. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 143–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Gibson RM (1983) Leks and mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 109–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain JE (1982) Biology of mayflies. Annu Rev Entomol 27:119–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Chvála M (1983) The Empidoidea (Diptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. II. Fauna Entomol Scand 12:1–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Chvála M, Wagner R (1989) Family Empididae. In: Soós A, Papp L (eds) Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera. Vol 6. Therevidae-Empididae. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, pp 228–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and sexual selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes JA (1969) The swarming and mating flight of Diptera. Annu Rev Entomol 14:271–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gruhl K (1924) Paarungsgewohnheiten der Dipteren. Z Wiss Zool 122:205–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruhl K (1963) Sind Tänze von Weibchen bei Empis and Rhamphomya (Diptera) an gewisse Sondermerkmale gebunden? Mitt Dtsch Entomol Ges 22:88–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddow AJ, Corbet PS (1961) Entomological studies from a high tower in Mpanga Forest, Uganda. V. Swarming activity above the forest. Trans Roy Entomol Soc London 113:284–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Pess, Cambridge, pp 3–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR, Verell PA (1986) Sexual selection and body size in amphibians. Herpetol J 1:86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund L, Robertson JGM (1989) Lekking behaviour in crested newts, Triturus cristatus. Ethology 80:111–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibino Y (1986) Female choice for male gregariousness in a stink bug, Megacopta punctitissimum (Montandon) (Heteroptera, Plataspidae). J Ethol 4:91–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Höglund J, Robertson JGM (1990) Female preference, male decision rules and the evolution of leks in the great snipe Gallinago media. Anim Behav 40:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetos AC (1980) Strategies of female choice: A theoretical analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederhouse RC (1982) Territorial defence and lek behaviour of the swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Okubo A, Chiang HC (1974) An analysis of the kinematics of swarming of Anarete pritchardi Kim. (Diptera: Cecidomyidae). Res Popul Ecol 16:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Oring L (1982) Avian mating systems. In: Farner D, King J, Parkes K (eds) Avian biology VI. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1978) Evolution of competitive mate searching. Annu Rev Entomol 23:173–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JB (1990) Lek behaviour in birds: do displaying males reduce nest predation? Anim Behav 39:555–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Pont AC (1987) ‘The mysterious swarms of sepsid flies’: an enigma solved? J Nat Hist 21:305–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1987) The evolution of leks through female choice. Anim Behav 35:1424–1432

    Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen E (1978) Swarming in Ephemeroptera: the mechanism of swarming and the effects of illumination and weather. Ann Zool Fenn 15:17–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelly TE (1990) Waiting for mates: variation in female encounter rates within and between leks of Drosophila conformis. Behaviour 107:34–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Parker GA (1989) Nuptial feeding in insects: Mating effort versus paternal investment. Ethology 81:332–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan RT (1981) Insect swarming and mating. Florida Entomol 64:44–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson BG, Petersson E (1987) Sex-role reversed courtship behaviour, sexual dimorphism and nuptial gifts in the dance fly Empis borealis (L.). Ann Zool Fenn 23:323–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson BG, Petersson E (1988) Non-random mating in the dance fly Empis borealis: The importance of male choice. Ethology 79:307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson BG, Petersson E, Forsgren E (1989) Why do males of the dance fly Empis borealis refuse to mate? The importance of female age and size. J Insect Behav 2:387–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson BG, Petersson E, Frisk M (1990) Nuptial gift size prolongs copulation duration in the dance fly Empis borealis. Ecol Entomol 15:225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomikoski R (1938) Phänologische Beobachtungen über die Empididen (Diet.) Süd- and Mittelfinnlands. Ann Entomol Fenn 4:213–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomikoski R (1939) Beobachtungen uber das Schwärmen und die Kopulation einiger Empididen (Dipt.). Ann Entomol Fenn 5:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehrencamp SL, Bradbury JW (1984) Mating systems and ecology. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 251–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger JF (1979) The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. In: Marler P, Vandenbergh J (eds) Handbook of behavioral neurobiology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 271–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW (1980) Female choice of least costly males: a possible factor in the evolution of leks. Z Tierpsychol 54:357–367

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: B.G. Svensson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Svensson, B.G., Petersson, E. Why insects swarm: testing the models for lek mating systems on swarming Empis borealis females. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31, 253–261 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171680

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00171680

Keywords