Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of solution and membrane-bound DNA × DNA hybridization, as used to infer phylogeny

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new method of membrane-bound DNA × DNA hybridization was devised to accommodate the study of small quantities of DNA obtained from museum specimens for phylogeny reconstruction. Membranebound, single-stranded target genomic DNAs were competitively hybridized with a total genomic DNA probe to form hybrid duplexes required for the DNA dissociation experiments. We compared the thermal elution profiles derived from dissociating duplexes made with probes of whole genomic, single-copy, and repetitive DNA, as well as solution DNA × DNA hybridization using sc tracer. Quantitatively, pairwise indices of genetic distance derived from duplexes made with genomic probes depended entirely on hybridization of repetitive sequences, but a parallel set of experiments using repetitive and sc probes produced qualitatively similar results. The indices of genetic distance generated by the membrane-bound hybrids form an internally consistent, resolved tree which is in agreement with the solution DNA × DNA hybridization trials and traditional views of the phylogeny of the taxa under study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bledsoe AH (1987) Estimation of phylogeny from molecular distance data: the issue of variable rates. Auk 104:563–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Bledsoe AH, Raikow RJ (1990) A quantitative assessment of congruence between molecular and nonmolecular estimates of phylogeny. J Mol Evol 30:247–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Bledsoe AH, Sheldon FH (1990) Molecular homology and DNA hybridization. J Mol Evol 30:425–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner TI, Brenner DJ, Neufeld BR, Britten RJ (1973) Reduction in the rate of DNA reassociation by sequence divergence. J Mol Biol 81:123–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Britten RJ, Davidson EH (1971) Repetitive and nonrepetitive sequences and a speculation on the origins of evolutionary novelty. Q Rev Biol 46:111–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Britten RJ, Graham DE, Neufeld BR (1974) Analysis of repeating sequences by reassociation. Methods Enzymol 29:363–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell E (1983) DNA/DNA hybridization studies of muroid rodents: symmetry and rates of molecular evolution. Evolution 37:1034–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Evolution 21:550–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Church GM, Gilbert W (1984) Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:1991–1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle WF (1985) The evolutionary significance of middle repetitive DNAs. In: Cavalier-Smith T (ed) The evolution of genome size. Wiley, New York, pp 443–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover G, Strachan T, Brown SDM (1981) The evolution of genomes in closely-related species. In: Scudder GGE, Reveal JL (eds) Evolution today. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, pp 337–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden FC, Hendrick JP, Gottlieb SS (1978) Homology of single-copy and repeated sequences in chicken, duck, Japanese quail, and ostrich DNA. Biochemistry 17:5113–5121

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B (1984) A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 137:266–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP—phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi R, Bowman B, Freiberger M, Rider OA, Wilson AC (1984) DNA sequences from the quagga, an extinct member of the horse family. Nature 312:282–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houde P, Braun MJ (1988) Museum collections as a source of DNA for studies of avian phylogeny. Auk 105:773–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer BH, McCarthy BJ, Bolton ET (1964) A molecular approach in the systematics of higher organisms. Science 144:959–967

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JL (1981) Genetic characterization. In: Gerhardt P (ed) Manual of methods for general microbiology. American Society of Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 450–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch JAW, Ganje RJ, Oleson KG, Hoffman DW, Bledsoe AH (1990) TED, an improved thermal elution devise for the simultaneous hydroxyapatite chromatography of solution DNA/DNA hybrids. Biotechniques 8:505–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski C (1989) Comparative DNA reassociation kinetics of cranes. Biochem Genet 27:131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen CS, Brooks JE, de Kloet E, de Kloet SR (1994) Sequence conservation of an avian centromeric repeated DNA component. Genome 37:351–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson SL (1985) The fossil record of birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology, vol 8. Academic Press, New York, pp 79–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Pääbo S (1985) Molecular cloning of ancient Egyptian mummy DNA. Nature 314:644–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarich VM, Schmid CW, Marks J (1989) DNA hybridization as a guide to phylogeny: a critical analysis. Cladistics 5:3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid CW, Marks J (1990) DNA hybridization as a guide to phylogeny: chemical and physical limits. J Mol Evol 30:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze DH, Lee CS (1986) DNA sequence comparison among closely related Drosophila species in the mulleri complex. Genetics 113: 287–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon FH (1987) Rates of single-copy DNA evolution in herons. Mol Biol Evol 4:56–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon FH, Bledsoe AH (1989) Indexes to the reassociation and stability of solution DNA hybrids. J Mol Evol 29:328–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon FH, Kinnarney M (1993) The effects of sequence removal on DNA-hybridization estimates of distance, phylogeny, and rates of evolution. Syst Biol 42:3–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon FH, Slikas B, Kinnarney M, Gill FB, Zhao E, Silverin B (1992) DNA-DNA hybridization evidence of phylogenetic relationships among major lineages of Parus. Auk 109:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1981) The phylogeny and relationships of the ratite birds as indicated by DNA-DNA hybridization. In: Scudder GGE, Reveal JL (eds) Evolution today. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, pp 301–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1990) Phylogeny and classification of birds. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern E (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer M, Krajewski C (1989) DNA hybridization in animal taxonomy: a critique from first principles. Q Rev Biol 64:291–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore A (1960) A classification of birds of the world. Smithson Misc Coll 139:1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren HN, Johnson JL, Cochran DG (1989) Evolutionary inferences from a comparison of cockroach nuclear DNA and DNA from their fat-body and egg endosymbionts. Evolution 43:276–281

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: P. Houde

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houde, P., Sheldon, F. & Kreitman, M. A comparison of solution and membrane-bound DNA × DNA hybridization, as used to infer phylogeny. J Mol Evol 40, 678–688 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160517

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160517

Key words

Navigation