Abstract
We perceive relevance by virtue of inference habits, which may be expressed as Pierce's leading principles or as Toulmin's warrants. Hence relevance in a descriptive sense is a ternary relation between two statements and a set of inference rules. For a normative sense, the warrants must be properly backed. Different types of warrant to empirical generalizations, we introduce L.J. Cohen's notion of inductive support. A to empirical generalizations, we introduce L.J. Cohen's notion of inductive support. A generalization H is supported by evidence E to degree i/in iff E indicates that H passes canonical test i, where there are n canonical tests. In a canonical test, one or more relevant variables, factors which may falsify H, are varied. H passes a test if it is not falsified. The tests are cumulative. Degree of support is relative to the canonical test, and may be modeled as relative to a point in a dialectical situation. A value of a variable at which H is falsified is a rebutting value. A is normatively relevant to B with respect to W iff sup[associated generalization(W), E] = i/n and for j > i, there is a presumption that the values of j are non-rebuting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blair, J. Anthony and Ralph H. Johnson: 1987, ‘Argumentation as Dialectical’, Argumentation 1 (1), 41–56.
Cohen, L. Jonathan: 1977, The Probable and the Provable, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cohen, L. Jonathan: 1989, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Induction and Probability, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland/Cinnaminson, U.S.A.
Freeman, James B.: 1985, ‘Dialectical Situations and Argument Analysis’, Informal Logic 7 (2 & 3), 151–162.
Freeman, James B.: 1991, Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments, Foris Publications, Berlin/New York.
Freeman, James B.: 1992, ‘A Dialectical Approach too Statement Acceptibility’, in F.H. van Eemere, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair, and C.A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentatoin, SicSat, Amsterdam.
Hitchcock, David: 1985, ‘Enthymematic Arguments’, Informal Logic 7 (2 & 3), 83–97.
Pierce, Charles S.: 1955, ‘What iss a Leading Principle’, in Justus Buchler (ed.), Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, pp. 129–134.
Toulmin, Stephen: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Walton, Douglas N.: 1989, Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freeman, J.B. Relevance, warrants, backing, inductive support. Argumentation 6, 219–275 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154327
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154327