Abstract
Most current methods for describing animal home range assume that it may be represented as a Euclidean type shape such as a bell shaped curve or a closed polygon. Landscape ecology has increasingly shown that ecological objects are more often highly fragmented and irregular. A fractal approach to description of animal home range was thus developed. For each point where the animal was observed, a circle centered on this point was first laid down to represent the area searched for prey by the animal during a short time interval. In this way the behavior of the animal and differences between species can be represented. Next, a fine grid is laid over the map and the height of each grid square computed by the number of circles that overlap that square. Then, the fractal dimension of the resultant 3-D surface is calculated at several scales. From an analysis of data from a hawk, the existence of perching behavior can be inferred, as well as the observation that at coarse scales the hawk behavior is self-similar and resembles a random walk. The home range thus analyzed in no way resembles a closed figure such as a polygon because it is highly fragmented. Further analysis showed that the fractal measures are relatively insensitive to sample size and to measurement error. Code is included for performing the analyses.
References
Altmann, S.A. and Altmann, J. 1970. Baboon ecology. University of Chicago Press. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andersen, D.J. 1982. The home range: a new nonparametric estimation technique. Ecology 63: 103–112.
Barnsley, M. 1988. Fractals Everywhere. Academic Press, N.Y.
Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Dicke, M. and Burrough, P.A. 1988. Using fractal dimensions for characterizing tortuosity of animal trails. Physiolog. Ent. 13: 393–398.
Dunn, J.E. 1978. Computer programs for the analysis of radio telemetry data in the study of home range. U. Ark. Stat. Lab. Tech. Rept. 7.
Dunn, J.E. 1979. A complete test for dynamic territorial interaction. U. Ark. Stat. Lab. Tech. Rept. 10.
Dunn, J.E. and Gipson, P.S. 1977. Analysis of radio telemetry data in studies of home range. Biometrics 33: 85–101.
Ford, R.G. and Krumme, D.W. 1979. The analysis of space use patterns. Journal of Theoretical Biology 76: 125–155.
H»kanson, L. 1978. The length of closed geomorphic lines. Mathem. Geol. 10: 141–167.
Harestad, A.S. and Bunnel, F.L. 1979. Home range and body weight — a reevaluation. Ecology 60: 389–402.
Jennrich, R.I. and Turner, F.B. 1969. Measurement of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22: 227–237.
Krummel, J.R., Gardner, R.H., Sugihara, G., O'Neill, R.V. and Coleman, P.R. 1987. Landscape patterns in a disturbed environment. Oikos 48: 321–324.
Lam, N.S.-N. 1990. Description and measurement of Landsat TM images using fractals. Phot. Eng. & Remote Sens. 56: 187–195.
Loehle, C. 1983. The fractal dimension and ecology. Speculations in Science and Technology 6: 313–342.
Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D. and Tsonis, A.A. 1987. Functional box-counting and multiple elliptical dimensions in rain. Science 235: 1036–1038.
MacDonald, D.W., Ball, F.G. and Hough, N.G. 1980. The evaluation of home range size and configuration using radio tracking data. In A Handbook on biotelemetry and radio tracking, pp 405–424. Edited by C.J. Amlaner and D.W. MacDonald. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mandelbrot, B.B. 1983. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W.H. Freeman and Co., N.Y.
McNab, B.K. 1963. Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. American Naturalist 97: 133–140.
Milne, B.T. 1988. Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. App. Math. Comput. 27: 67–79.
Morse, D.R., Lawton, J.H., Dodson, M.M. and Williamson, M.H. 1985. Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths. Nature 314: 731–733.
Neu, C.W., Byers, C.R. and Peek, J.M. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization — availability data. J. Wildl. Manage. 38: 541–545.
Palmer, M.W. 1988. Fractal geometry: a tool for describing spatial patterns of plant communities. Vegetatio 75: 91–102.
Phillips, J.D. 1985. Measuring complexity of environmental gradients. Vegetatio 64: 95–102.
Pietgen, H.O. and Saupe, D. 1988. The Science of Fractal Images. Springer Verlag, N.Y.
Samuel, M.D. and Garton, E.O. 1985. Home range: a weighted normal estimate and tests of underlying assumptions. J. Wildl. Manage. 49: 513–519.
Sanderson, G.C. 1966. The study of mammal movements: A review. J. Wildl. Manage. 30: 215–235.
Schoener, T.W. 1968. Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 49: 123–141.
Schoener, T.W. 1981. An empirically based estimate of home range. Theoretical Population Biology 20: 281–325.
Sharpe, P.J.H., Walker, J., Penridge, L.K., Wu, H. and Rykiel Jr, E.J. 1986. Spatial considerations in physiological models of tree growth. Tree Physiology 2: 403–421.
Southwood, T.R.E. 1966. Ecological methods. Methuen, London. United Kingdom.
Swihart, R.K., Slade, N.A. and Bergstrom, B.J. 1988. Relating body size to the rate of home range use in mammals. Ecology 63: 393–399.
Trevor-Deutsch, B. and Hackett, D.F. 1980. An evaluation of several grid trapping methods by comparison with radio telemetry in a home range study of the eastern chipmunk (Tamiasstriatus L.). In A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking, pp 375–385. Edited by C.J. Amlaner and D.W. MacDonald. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Turner, F.B., Jennrich, R.I. and Weintraub, J.D. 1969. Home ranges and the body size of lizards. Ecology 50: 1076–1081.
Turner, M.G., Constanza, R. and Sklar, F.H. 1989. Methods to evaluate the performance of spatial simulation models. Ecol. Model. 48: 1–18.
Van Winkle, W. 1975. Comparison of several probabilistic home-range models. Journal of Wildlife Management 39: 118–123.
Van Winkle, W., Martin, D.C. and Sebetich, M.J. 1973. A home-range model for animals inhabiting an ecotone. Ecology 54: 205–209.
Voigt, D.R. and Tinline, R.R. 1980. Strategies for analyzing radio tracking data. In A Handbook on Biotelemetry and Radio Tracking, pp 387–404. Edited by C.J. Amlaner and D.W. MacDonald. Pergamon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loehle, C. Home range: A fractal approach. Landscape Ecol 5, 39–52 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153802
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153802