Abstract
In everyday discourse, the term ‘urban’ causes few problems, but it certainly has for social theory. While the paper accepts the recent consensus that the term no longer serves to refer to a distinct object in capatalist societies, it argues that the familiar arguments have been confused by inadequate approaches to the problem of definition and inadequate concepts of ‘space’ and ‘ideology’. Clarification of such definitions is a prime task of social theory and different methods of definition are discussed. The paper ends with a commentary on what is probably the best attempt at defining the urban — Raymond Williams‘ ‘The Country and the City’.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sayer, A. Defining the urban. GeoJournal 9, 279–284 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149040
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149040