Skip to main content
Log in

Defining the urban

  • Social Geography
  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In everyday discourse, the term ‘urban’ causes few problems, but it certainly has for social theory. While the paper accepts the recent consensus that the term no longer serves to refer to a distinct object in capatalist societies, it argues that the familiar arguments have been confused by inadequate approaches to the problem of definition and inadequate concepts of ‘space’ and ‘ideology’. Clarification of such definitions is a prime task of social theory and different methods of definition are discussed. The paper ends with a commentary on what is probably the best attempt at defining the urban — Raymond Williams‘ ‘The Country and the City’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sayer, A. Defining the urban. GeoJournal 9, 279–284 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149040

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149040

Keywords

Navigation