Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of earthquake hazard in Panama based on seismotectonic regionalization

  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of seismic hazard in Panama is made using a seismotectonic regionalization model. The coefficients of Gumbel's Type-I distribution are calculated and return periods for several magnitudes are found. From these coefficients intensities, peak ground acceleration and earthquake hazard for a set of return periods and epicentral distances are estimated and substantial variations in the probability of occurrence are noted. The Panama Fracture Zone (PFZ) and the Panama-South America Suture Zone (PSZ) provinces are the most active in producing earthquakes with a magnitude of about 7.0 in less than 16 yr. Magnitude 7.0 earthquakes in the Azuero province have a return period of about 160 yr, whereas in the Panama Deformed Belt (PDB) province the return period for magnitude 7.5 events is about 175 yr.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bolt, B. A. and Abrahamson, N. A.: 1982, New attenuation relations for peak and expected accelerations of strong ground motion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 2307–2321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonilla, M. G., Mark, R. K., and Linkaemper, J. J.: 1984, Statistical relations among earthquake magnitude, surface rupture length and surface fault displacement, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 2379–2411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, C. A.: 1968, Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull Seismol. Soc. Am. 58, 1583–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian, A. and Ang, A. H.: 1977, A fault rupture model for seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 67, 1173–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, N. C.: 1973, Earthquake hazards for buildings, in Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, Natl. Bur. Standards Buildings Sci. Series, No. 1. 46, pp. 82–111.

  • Erdik, M., Doyuran, V., Akkas, N., and Gulkan P.: 1985, A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey, Tectonophysics 117, 295–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteva, L.: 1970, Seismic risk and seismic design decisions, in Hansen, R. Y. (ed), Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, Mass. Inst. Technol., Cambridge, Mass. pp. 142–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva, L. and Villaverde, R.: 1973, Seismic risk, design spectra and structural reliability, Proc. 5th. World Conf. Earthquake Eng., Rome, pp. 2586–2597.

  • Gumbel, E. J.: 1958, Extreme Value Statistics, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, T. C. and Kanamori, H.: 1979, A moment magnitude scale, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2348–2350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil, D.: Response of an accretionary prism to transform ridge collision south of Panama, M. Sc. Thesis, Univ. Calif. at Santa Cruz.

  • Joyner, W. B. and Boore, D. M.: 1981, Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71, 2011–2038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. C.: 1981, Earthquake Risk and Damage Functions, Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomnitz, C.: 1974, Global Tectonics and Earthquake Risk, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowroozi, A. A. and Ahmadi, G.: 1986, Analysis of earthquake risk in Iran based on seismotectonic provinces, Tectonophysics 122, 89–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcaru, G. and Berckhemer, H.: 1978, A magnitude scale for very large earthquakes, Tectonophysics 49, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, C. F.: 1958, Elementary Seismology, Freeman, San Francisco, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, P. B. and Seed, H. B.: 1973, Acceleration in rock for earthquakes in the Western United States, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 63, 501–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, H., Mortgart, C., Kiremidjian, A. S., and Zguthy, T.: 1975, A study of seismic risk for Nicaragua, The John Blume Earthquake Eng. Center Report No. 1, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergara Muñoz, A.: 1987a, Seismicity of Panama during the interval 1904–83, Upp. Univ. Seismol. Dept. Report (1–87).

  • Vergara Muñoz, A.: 1987b, Seismicity of the Panama Block, II: Spatial attenuation of seismic intensities, Tectonophysics 156, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara Muñoz, A: 1988a, Seismicity of the Panama Block, I: magnitudes and spatial distribution of epicentres, Tectonophysics 145, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara Muñoz, A.: 1988b, Tectonic patterns of the Panama Block deduced from seismicity, gravitational data and earthquake focal mechanisms: implications to the seismic hazard, Tectonophysics 154, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yegulalp, T. M. and Kuo, J. T.: 1974, Statistical prediction of the occurrence of maximum magnitude earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64, 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muñoz, A.V. Assessment of earthquake hazard in Panama based on seismotectonic regionalization. Nat Hazards 2, 115–131 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141386

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141386

Key words:

Navigation