Skip to main content
Log in

The use of remotely-sensed satellite imagery for landscape classification in Wales (U.K.)

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Remotely-sensed satellite data from Landsat TM and MSS were processed digitally to make landscape classifications of three study areas of south east Wales. The classifications were constructed by classifying major variations in land cover mosaics within the areas, and using these data to group the 1 km × 1 km cells of the National Grid into landscape classes according to the combination of cover types found within them. The TWINSPAN algorithm, which is a polythetic, divisive classification method, was used as the basis of the study.

The results showed that while satellite imagery could only be used to extract information about land cover, the close association betwen landscape, land cover and terrain meant that the major physical divisions in the study area could also be detected in the landscape classification. The landscape types recognised in the study were found to be consistent with those indicated in other independent data which relate to the areas. These data included the ITE Land Classes for Great Britain, and the Agricultural (June) Census statistics for England and Wales.

The approach to landscape classification described allows landscape classifications to be made rapidly. These classifications can provide a sampling frameworks for landscape survey in areas where basic map data are lacking or resources for field survey are limited. The landscape classifications can also assist in making landscape evaluations since they allow different landscape types to be compared in respect of such properties such as their typicalness, rarity, naturalness and position on a geographical or ecological gradient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J.A. 1986. How few data do we need: some radical thoughts on renewable natural resource surveys. Remote Sensing for Resources Development and Environmental Management, Proceedings, V2, 901–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. et al. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Society Professional Paper No. 964.

  • Ball, D.F., Dale, J., Dickson, K. and Williams, W.M. 1981. Ecology of vegetation change in upland landscapes, part 1: general synthesis. Bangor Occasional Paper No. 13, Bangor ITE.

  • Ball, D.F. and Williams, W.M. 1977. The uplands of England and Wales - land characteristics and classification. Unpublished report to the Countryside Commission. ITE Project 396.

  • Barr, C.J. and Dias, W.B.C. 1989. Keying out kilometre squares. Merelwood Research and Development Paper.

  • Barr, C.J., Benefield, C.B., Bunce, R.G.H., Ridsdale, H.A. and Whittaker, M. 1986. Landscape Change in Britain. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Abbots Ripton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B.G., Murray, T.D., Howard, D.C. and Bunce, R.G.H. 1989. The environmental constraints on the UK resource for wind energy. NERC Contract Report to the Energy Technology Support Group, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Merelwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benefield, C.B. and Bunce, R.G.H. 1982. A Preliminary Visual Presentation of Land Classes in Britain. Merelwood Research and Development Paper, No. 91.

  • Bunce, R.G.H., Barr, C.J. and Whittaker, H.A. 1981. An integrated system of land classification. Natural Environment Research Council. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Annual Report 1980, 28-33.

  • Bunce, R.G.H., Barr, C.J. and Whittaker, H.A. 1981b. Land Classes in Great Britain: Preliminary Descriptions for Users of the Method of Land Classification. Merelwood Research and Development Paper No 86.

  • Bunce, R.G.H., Barr, C.J. and Whittaker, H.A. 1983. A stratification system for ecological sampling. In Ecological mapping from ground, air and space. Edited by R. Fuller, Cambridge, 39–46.

  • Bunce, R.G.H., Claridge, C.J., Barr, C.J. and Baldwin, M.B. 1986a. An ecological classification of land - its application to planning in the Highland Region, Scotland. In Land and Its Uses - Actual and Potential: An Environmental Appraisal. Edited by F.T. Last, M.C.B. Holtz and B.G. Bell, Plenum, 407–426.

  • Bunce, R.G.H., Claridge, C.J., Barr, C.J., Baldwin, M.B. and Cameron, R. 1986b. Some applications of the Highland Region rural land use information system to studies of forestry at a strategic level. In Computers in Forestry. Edited by W.L. Mason and R. Muetzelfeldt. Institute of Chartered Foresters, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, R.G.H., Pearce, M.L. and Mitchell, C.P. 1981c. The allocation of land for energy crops in Britain. In Energy from Biomass. Edited by W. Palz, P. Chartier and D.O. Hall. Proceedings of the First European Community Conference, Brighton. Applied Science, London, 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, R.G.H. and Smith, R.H. 1978. An Ecological Survey of Cumbria. Cumbria County Council and Lake District Special Planning Board, Kendal, Working Paper No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G., Knowles, D.T. and Philips, H.L. 1983. The accuracy of the agricultural census. Geography, 68: 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Countryside Commission. 1987. Landscape Assessment, A Countryside Commission Approach. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham, CCD 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, P., Harris, S., Bunce, R.G.H. and Jeffers, D.J. 1989. The badger (Meles meles) in Britain: present status and future population changes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 38: 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H.G. Jr. 1985. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press.

  • Goldsmith, F.B. 1983. Evaluating nature. In Conservation in Perspective. Edited by A. Warren and F.B. Goldsmith. Wiley. pp. 233–246.

  • Hill, M.O. 1979. TWINSPAN - A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Section of Ecology and Systematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O., Bunce, R.G.H. and Shaw, M.W. 1975. Indicator Species Analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland. Journal of Ecology, 63: 597–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Terrestrial Ecology. 1991. ITE Land Classification: Classification of all 1km Squares in GB. DoE/NERC Contract Report, PECD 7/2/88, TFS Project T02051k1.

  • Johnson, L.B. 1990. Analyzing spatial and temporal phenomena using geographic information systems - a review of ecological applications. Landscape Ecology, 4: 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw, K.A. 1985. Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology, Arnold.

  • Land Use Consultants. 1986. Mid-Wales Uplands Landscape Assessment. Land Use Consultants on behalf of the Countryside Commission.

  • MacDonald, D.W., Bunce, R.G.H. and Bacon, P.J. 1981. Fox populations habitat characterization and rabies control. Journal of Biogeography, 8: 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallock, A.J.C. 1988. VESPAN II. University of Lancaster.

  • Mather, P.M. 1985. A computationally-efficient maximum likelihood classifier employing prior probabilities. International Journal Remote Sensing, 6: 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, D. 1985. An initial classification of 10 km squares in Great Britain from a land characteristic data bank. Applied Geography, 5: 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell, B.C. 1973. Alternative Approaches to Landscape Appraisal and Evaluation. Middlesex Polytechnic Planning Research Group, Report 11, Enfield.

  • Penning-Rowsell, E.C. 1980. Fluctuating fortunes in gauging landscape value. Progress in Human Geography, 4, 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, D. 1977. Nature Conservation Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2 vols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D.G., Laurie, I.C., Wager, J.F. and Traill, A.L. 1976. Landscape Evaluation. Manchester University, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudeforth, C.C., Harnup, R., Lea, J.W., Thompson, T.R.E. and Wright, P.S. 1984. Soils and Their Use in Wales. Soil Survey of England and Wales, Bulletin No. 11, Harpenden.

  • Smith, R.S. 1982. The Use of Land Classification in Resource Assessment and Rural Planning. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.

  • Vink, A.P.A. 1983. Landscape Ecology and Land Use. Edited by D.A. Davidson, Longman.

  • Welsh Office. 1980. A Landscape Classification of Wales. Welsh Office, Cardiff, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh Office, 1983. Welsh Agricultural Statistics, No. 4, 1982. Welsh Office, Cardiff, Dd 83/9 450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh Office, 1985. Welsh Agricultural Statistics, No. 7, 1985. Welsh Office, Cardiff, Dd 85/36 500.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haines-Young, R.H. The use of remotely-sensed satellite imagery for landscape classification in Wales (U.K.). Landscape Ecol 7, 253–274 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131256

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131256

Keywords

Navigation