Skip to main content
Log in

The syntax of zenmeyang ‘how’ and weishenme ‘why’ in Mandarin Chinese

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the syntactic behaviors of zenmeyang ‘how’ and weishenme ‘why’ in Mandarin Chinese. Essentially, there are two asymmetries about these two adjuncts that must be accounted for, i.e., (a) the asymmetry with regard to their distributions in simplex sentences and long-distance extraction in complex constructions and (b) the asymmetry between extraction of weishenme from the complement clause of conjecture verbs and from the complement clause of opinion verbs. In this article, we show that while zenmeyang is base-generated within VP, weishenme is base-generated in the Spec of CP. This structural difference, coupled with a conjunctive formulation of the ECP and the assumption that intermediate traces are not subject to it, leads to the asymmetry between these two adjuncts with regard to long-distance extraction. As for the second asymmetry, we suggest that it comes from a strong/weak distinction of Comp; while a strong Comp, i.e., a Comp that can be lexically filled by question particles, may function as a head governor, a weak Comp may not. In addition to the preverbal zenmeyang, the descriptive/resultative postverbal zenmeyang ‘how’ is discussed and shown to be no different from the former with regard to long-distance extraction. A-not-A questions are also reanalyzed within our theory as a complete analogue to weishenme ‘why’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoun, Joseph (1985) A Grammar of Anaphora, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph (1986) Generalized Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph, Norbert Hornstein, and Dominique Sportiche (1981) “Some Aspects of Wide Scope Quantification,” Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph, Norbert Hornstein, David Lightfoot, and Amy Weinberg (1987) “Two Types of Locality,” Linguistic Inquiry 18, 537–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltin, Mark R. (1982) “A Landing Site Theory of Movement Rules,” Linguistic Inquiry 13, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi (1981) “The Syntax of ‘ne’: Some Theoretical Implications,” The Linguistic Review 1, 117–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, Dwight (1978) “Asking More Than One Thing at a Time,” in H. Hiz (ed.), Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 107–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, Ray (1978) “On the Source of Interrogative Adverbs,” Language 54, 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1977) “On Wh-movement,” in P. Culicover and T. Wasow (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1986) Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1988) “Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation,” ms., MIT.

  • Chung, Sandra (1991) “Functional Heads and Proper Government in Chamorro,” Lingua 85, 85–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornulier, Benoit de (1974) “Pourquoi' et l'inversion du sujet non clitique,” in C. Rohrer and N. Ruwet (eds.), Actes du colloque franco-allemand de grammaire transformationelle, I, Niemeyer, Tubingen, pp. 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Lori J. (1987) “Remarks on Government and Proper Government,” Linguistic Inquiry 18, 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, Thomas (1984) Towards a Unified Theory of Adverb Position in English, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erteschik, Nomi (1973) On the Nature of Island Constraints, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Fukui, Naoki (1986) A Theory of Category Projection and Its Applications, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Fukui, Naoki (1988) “LF Extraction of NAZE: Some Theoretical Implications,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 503–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, Grant (1986) “On Argument Structure and L-marking with Mandarin Chinese BA,” in J. McDonough and B. Plankett (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Northeast Linguistic Society, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, Michael (1990) “On Adjunct Extraction from Complements,” in Lisa Cheng and Hamida Demirdash (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 13, pp. 101–124.

  • Higginbotham, James and Robert May (1981) “Questions, Quantifiers, and Crossing,” The Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, Jack (1985) “Traces in Comp: Invisible or Nonexistent?” CLS 21, 160–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T. James (1982a) “Move WH in a Language Without WH Movement,” The Linguistic Review 1, 369–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T. James (1982b) Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Huang, C.-T. James (1987) “Chinese A-not-A Questions: A Modular Approach,” Proceedings of 2nd International Conference On Sinology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T. James (1988) “Wo PAO DE KUAI and Chinese Phrase Structure,” Language 64, 274–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T. James (to appear) Chinese Syntax and Logical Form, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

  • Ikawa, Hajime (1987) “Constraints on Wh-movement,” English Linguistics 4, 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Kyle (1988) “Clausal Gerunds, the ECP, and Government,” Linguistic Inquiry 19, 583–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard (1981) “ECP Extensions,” Linguistic Inquiry 12, 93–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard (1984) Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, Makoto (1988) “Notes on Antecedent-government and Blocking Categories,” English Linguistics 5, 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, Jan (1987) Domains and Dynasty: The Radical Autonomy of Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito (1984) “On the Nature of Proper Government,” Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, Howard and Mamoru Saito (1989) Move Alpha, ms., University of Connecticut.

  • Lee, Hun-Tak (1986) Studies on quantification in Chinese, PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson (1979) “The Pragmatics of Two Types of Yes-No Question in Mandarin and Its Universal Implications,” CLS 15, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar, University of California Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.-H. Audrey (1985) Abstract Case in Chinese, PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.

  • Lin, Jo-Wang (1989) On Adjunct Extraction of Weisheme and Zeme(yang) in Mandarin Chinese, MA thesis, Tsing-Hua University, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Jo-Wang and C.-C. Jane Tang (1991) “Modals in Chinese,” paper read at the 3rd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Cornell University.

  • Longobardi, Giuseppe (forthcoming) Movement, Scope and Island Constraints, ms., University of Venice.

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke (1986) Quantification in Syntax, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke (1987) “Some Observations on NAZE,” Metropolitan Linguistics 7, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oba, Yukio (1987) “On γ-assignment in LF,” English Linguistics 4, 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Jean-Yves (1989) “Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP,” Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi (1990) Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochemont, Michael (1986) Focus in Generative Grammar, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John R. (1984) “Inner Islands,” Berkeley Linguistic Society 10, 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, Catherine (1988) “On Multiple Questions and Multiple WH-fronting,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 445–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobin, Nicholas (1991) “Agreement in CP,” Lingua 84, 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, Dominique (1988) “A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure,” Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Timothy (1981) Origins of Phrase Structure, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Tajima, Kazuhiko and Kaneaki Arimura (1988) Two Types of Variables: A D-structure Adjunction Approach to Null Operator Constructions, CLS 24, 362–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takami, Ken-ichi (1987) “Adjuncts and the Internal Structure of VP,” English Linguistics 4, 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C.-C. Jane (1988) “Hanyu de Yiwei, Chenjie-tiaojian yu Konghao-yuanze [Movement, Subjacency and the ECP in Chinese],” paper read at the Second International Conference on Chinese Language and Teaching, Taipei, Taiwan.

  • Tang, C.-C. Jane (1990) Chinese Phrase Structure and Extended X-bar Theory, PhD dissertation, Cornell University.

  • Tang, Ting-Chi (1977) Guoyu Bianxing Yufa Yanjiu: Yiwei Bianxing 1 [Studies of Transformational Grammar of Chinese: Movement Transformation 1], Student Book CO, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Ting-Chi (1984) “Guoyu Yiwenju Xulun [A Further Study on Chinese Questions],” Shida Xuebao 29, 381–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Ting-Chi (1988a) Hanyu Cifa Jiufa Runji [Essays on Chinese Morphology and Syntax], Student Books CO, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Ting-Chi (1988b) “Pupian-yufa yu Yin-han Duibi-fenxi [Universal Grammar and Contrastive Analysis Between English and Chinese],” paper read at the second International Conference on Chinese Language and Teaching, Taipei, Taiwan.

  • Tang, Ting-Chi (1991) “The Syntax and Semantics of Resultative Complements in Chinese: A Comparative Study of Mandarin and South Min Dialects,” paper read at the 3rd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Cornell University.

  • Travis, Lisa (1988) “The Syntax of Adverbs,” McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, McGill University (also in NELS 19).

  • Tsai, Wei-Tien (1991) “On Nominal Islands and LF Extraction in Chinese,” in Lisa Cheng and Hamida Demirdash (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Liejiong (1990) “Remarks on LF Movement in Chinese Questions,” Linguistics 28, 355–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Dexi (1982) Yufa Jiangyi [Lecture Notes on Grammar], Shangwu Chubanshe, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to the following people for encouragement as well as reading and commenting on an earlier version of this paper: C.-T. James Huang, Mei-jin Huang, Shujun Ke, Chen-sheng Liu, Kuang Mei, Chih-chen Jane Tang, Ting-chi Tang, John Truscutt, Feng-fu Tsao, Wei-tian Tsai. Two anonymous reviewers' suggestions and detailed comments lead to a great improvement of the final version of this article. As usual, none of these people should be responsible for any remaining error.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, JW. The syntax of zenmeyang ‘how’ and weishenme ‘why’ in Mandarin Chinese. J East Asian Linguis 1, 293–331 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130555

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130555

Keywords

Navigation