Skip to main content
Log in

State-mandated assisting and assessing teachers: Levels of state control

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alaska Admin. Code tit. 19.030 (January 1983).

  • Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §15-537 (1986).

  • Arizona Department of Education. (1991). Qualified evaluator training manual, p. 9.

  • Arkansas Evaluation Sub-Committee Report, Adopted by the State Board of Education. (December 1985).

  • Campbell, R.; Cunningham, L., Nystrand, R., & Usdan, M. (1990). The organizational and control of American schools. Sixth ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, R. & Goertz, M. (1990). Educational standards in the 50 states: 1990, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colorado Department of Education. (1991). Certificated Personnel Performance Guidelines, 1991.

  • Connecticut State Department of Education Guidelines for Comprehensive Professional Development Plans, 1990.

  • Darling-Hammond, L. & Berry, E. (1988). The evaluation of teacher policy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. & Sclan, E. (1992). Policy and supervision. In Glickman, C. (Ed.), Supervision in transition. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, pp. 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. Wise, A., & Pease, S. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaware Department of Education. (1990). Policy for appraising teachers and specialists.

  • Florida State Department of Education. (1988). Handbook for the review of district instructional personnel assessment systems.

  • French, R. L., Holdzkom, D. & Kuligowski, B. (1990, April). Teacher evaluation in SREB states. Stage 1: Analysis and comparison of evaluation systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

  • Furtwengler, C.B. (1991). A response to Milner. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(10), 785–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgia State Department of Education. (1989). Georgia Teacher Evaluation Program Evaluation Manual.

  • Hawaii Department of Education. (1984). Program for assessing teaching in Hawaii. Office of Personnel Services/Personnel Management, Certification and Development Branch.

  • Hazi, H. M. (1989). Measurement vs. supervisory judgment: The case of Sweeney vs. Turlington. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(3), 211–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdzkom, D. (1987). Appraising teacher performance in North Carolina. Educational Leadership, 44(7), 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois Admin. Code tit. 23 § 50.10–50.50 (1990).

  • Iowa Code § 270.14.

  • Iwanicki, E. (1981). Contract plans. In Millman, J. (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf, K. (1980) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mass. Regs. Code tit. 603 § 35.02 (1987).

  • Minn. Stat. § 125.12.3–12.4 (1990).

  • Montana Admin. R. 10.55.701 (1991).

  • Nebraska Admin. R. & Regs. tit. 92, Chapter 34, 004.01B1 (1985).

  • New Jersey Admin. Code tit. 6 § 3-1.19 (1988).

  • New Mexico State Board of Education. (1986). Guidelines for professional development.

  • New York Comp. Codes R. & Regs. § 100.2, 152.6 (1989).

  • Ohio Legis. Serv. 9.13 (Baldwin). (1990).

  • Oklahoma Accreditations Standards for Schools. (1987).

  • 22 Pennsylvania Code § 351.21–351.24 (1982).

  • Pope, L. M. (1983). State regulation of educator evaluation. In Beckman, J., & Zirkel, P. (Eds.), Legal issues in public school employment. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode Island General Law 16-2-9. (1988).

  • Rosenshine, B. (1986). Synthesis of research on explicit teaching. Educational Leadership, 43(7), 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, A. & Fuhrman, S. (1981). Legislative education leadership in the states. Washington, DC: Institute for Education Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (1991). Instructional supervision and the redefinition of who does it in schools. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(1), 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, K. & Anderson, R. (1986). Managing productive schools. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • South Carolina Code Ann. § 59-26-30 (Law. Co-op. 1990).

  • Stiggins, R.J. & Bridgeford, N.J. (1985). Performance assessment for teacher development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(1), 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, D. & Tanner, L. (1987). Supervision in education. New York: MacMillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennessee State Department of Education. (1988). Career Ladder State Model for Local Evaluation Manual.

  • Texas Education Agency. (1990). Texas Teacher Appraisal System Appraiser/Teacher Manual.

  • Tracy, S.J. & MacNaughton, R. (1993). Assisting and assessing educational personnel. Boston, MA: Allyn Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. (1990). A national survey of state teacher evaluation policies. An unpublished survey (sent via personal correspondence with the author).

  • Webb, L., Greer, J., Montello, P., & Norton, M. (1987). Personnel administration in education. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • West Virginia Admin. Code § 5310 (1987).

  • Wis. Stat. § 121.02 (1991).

  • Wisconsin School District Standards and Rules, Q. (1991).

  • Wise, A. (1988). Legislated learning revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(5), 328–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A.E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M.W., & Bernstein, H.T. (1984) Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuhs, S.K. & Manatt, R.P. (1983). The pace of mandated teacher evaluation picks up. American School Board Journal, 170(5), 28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tracy, S.J., Smeaton, P. State-mandated assisting and assessing teachers: Levels of state control. J Pers Eval Educ 6, 219–234 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125149

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00125149

Keywords

Navigation